1 / 14

Effects of Humidity on Locomotion in the common garden snail ( Helix aspersa )

Effects of Humidity on Locomotion in the common garden snail ( Helix aspersa ). Marissa Hackman, Hannah Kienzle, Alanna MacDonald & Jessica Browne. Introduction. Taxis vs. Kinesis Dry vs. Humid environments for snails Strategies for water conservation epiphragm

gram
Télécharger la présentation

Effects of Humidity on Locomotion in the common garden snail ( Helix aspersa )

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Effects of Humidity on Locomotion in the common garden snail (Helix aspersa) Marissa Hackman, Hannah Kienzle, Alanna MacDonald & Jessica Browne

  2. Introduction • Taxis vs. Kinesis • Dry vs. Humid environments for snails • Strategies for water conservation • epiphragm • reducing mucus production (i.e. moving less)

  3. Introduction Purpose • To determine how humidity affects the locomotion of the land snail (Helix aspersa)

  4. Hypothesis • The snails should show a preference for the moist environment due to the dangers of being in arid conditions • More arid environments should result in slower speeds for snails due to lower mucus production and the possible formation of the epiphragm

  5. Methods • Two main experimental set-ups: 1. Preference Test 2. Kinesis Test • Snails soaked in warm water

  6. Test Snails

  7. Methods • Eight 30 minute trials • Moist, neutral, dry • Cleaned between trials • Direction of chambers reversed • Location recorded every minute Preference Test

  8. Four set-ups 1. Low Humidity 2. Medium 3. High 4. Control • Three 20 minute trials • Snail path recorded Methods Kinesis Test

  9. Results - Preference Test Figure 1. Mean ± standard error of average time spent Helix aspersa (N=8) spent in each environment (Moist, neutral, desiccant) • Significance determined using a chi-square test • df=2 • Significant difference between conditions was detected (p< 0.05) • Spent more time in the neutral environment • Often stationary when the desiccant section of the chamber • Epiphragm

  10. Results - Kinesis Test Figure 1 – mean ± standard error of Helix aspersa velocity (N=3) in environments of varying levels of moisture (control, low, moderate, and high). • Kruskal-Wallis test • Not significantly different (p=0.183) • t-test • Dry and control (p=0.0093) • Moderate moist and control (p= 0.915) • Very moist and control (p=0.539) • Dry condition: completely stopped movement - epiphragm • Cheesecloth complications

  11. Discussion Why would the snails prefer neutral and dry conditions? • This was not consistent with other findings • Inherent flaws with the “preference” test • Inactivity is more energetically favorable than moving away in poor conditions • Suggests differences in kinesis depending on humidity

  12. Discussion Kinesis experiment • Snails in low humidity supported our hypothesis and the results of previous studies However: • High and moderate humidity did not increase speed • Favorable conditions give no incentive to change behaviour

  13. Conclusions and Implications • Snails do not move faster in more humid environments, although they are more likely to be active than in drier environments • Suggests that desiccant could be an effective means of pest control

  14. Avenues of Further Research • Testing movement over a soil substrate • Comparing slug and snail behaviour in these conditions

More Related