1 / 19

Comparison of Ctalk, No Ctalk, and First Pad Selection in Particle Detection Scenarios

This study presents a comprehensive analysis comparing three different particle detection scenarios: Ctalk (big pad), No Ctalk, and First Pad Selected, as outlined by Simone Brusa from INFN-Ferrara. We investigate aligned and misaligned scenarios with specific measurements for M4A and M4C pads, utilizing the latest geometry versions for Gauss, Boole, and Brunel software. The results reveal significant differences in X and Y residual distributions and the effectiveness of track selections leading to the conclusion that the “PADONE” configuration is optimal for our purposes.

griffith-wyatt
Télécharger la présentation

Comparison of Ctalk, No Ctalk, and First Pad Selection in Particle Detection Scenarios

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. SELECTION STUDIES Comparison between Ctalk, No Ctalk, first pad selected Simone Brusa, INFN-Ferrara

  2. OUTLINE Aligned scenario 1.B off • Three differents possibility for each of them (in order of analisys): • Ctalk (big pad); • No Ctalk; • First pad selected; Misaligned scenario in X: M4Aside=3mm, M4Cside=-6mm Aligned scenario 2.B on Misaligned scenario in X: M4Aside=3mm, M4Cside=-6mm New geometry and the last version of Gauss, Boole, Brunel are used in all the scenarios . M1-M5 are the fixed stations. Simone Brusa, INFN-Ferrara

  3. X residual distributions Boff, Aligned Ctalk No Ctalk first pad Simone Brusa, INFN-Ferrara

  4. X residual distributions Bon Aligned Ctalk No Ctalk First pad Simone Brusa, INFN-Ferrara

  5. Y residual distributions Boff, Aligned Ctalk No Ctalk First pad Simone Brusa, INFN-Ferrara

  6. Y residual distributions Bon Aligned Ctalk No Ctalk First pad Simone Brusa, INFN-Ferrara

  7. X residual distributions Boff, Misaligned Ctalk No Ctalk First pad Simone Brusa, INFN-Ferrara

  8. X residual distributions Bon, Misaligned Ctalk No Ctalk First pad Simone Brusa, INFN-Ferrara

  9. Y residual distributions Boff, Misaligned Ctalk No Ctalk First pad Simone Brusa, INFN-Ferrara

  10. Y residual distributions Bon, Misaligned Ctalk No Ctalk First pad Simone Brusa, INFN-Ferrara

  11. B off, Aligned, first pad, Ctalk M5 M4 M3 Simone Brusa, INFN-Ferrara

  12. M5 M4 B on, Aligned, first pad, Ctalk M3 Simone Brusa, INFN-Ferrara

  13. B off, Misaligned, first pad (R1 black, R2 red, R3 green, R4 blue),Ctalk the others one in each region 1/2 Simone Brusa, INFN-Ferrara

  14. B off, Misaligned, first pad (R1 black, R2 red, R3 green, R4 blue),Ctalk the others one in each region 2/2 Simone Brusa, INFN-Ferrara

  15. B on, Misaligned, first pad (R1 black, R2 red, R3 green, R4 blue),Ctalk the others one in each region 1/2 Simone Brusa, INFN-Ferrara

  16. B on, Misaligned, first pad (R1 black, R2 red, R3 green, R4 blue),Ctalk the others one in each region 2/2 Simone Brusa, INFN-Ferrara

  17. # Of tracks comparison The total number of processed tracks are not the same for all the cases Simone Brusa, INFN-Ferrara

  18. RESULTS FROM THE COMPARISONS But I think that rebbining for the chamber dimensions in the case of Y, we can use the Ctalk (big pad) without troubles Simone Brusa, INFN-Ferrara

  19. CONCLUSIONS • I think that the best selection for us is to use the “PADONE” for several reasons: - Shape of X (Y rebbining) residual distributions • Number of tracks respect No Ctalk selection Simone Brusa, INFN-Ferrara

More Related