1 / 21

The Impact of Erosion from Water Runoff

The Impact of Erosion from Water Runoff. By: Nicolas Wieland and Tony Nixon. Overview. Farm in Scott County, Minnesota Erosion occurs on a cattle pasture Drain tile directs water flow Additional surface water flow All water drains to a wetland.

grover
Télécharger la présentation

The Impact of Erosion from Water Runoff

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. The Impact of Erosion from Water Runoff By: Nicolas Wieland and Tony Nixon

  2. Overview • Farm in Scott County, Minnesota • Erosion occurs on a cattle pasture • Drain tile directs water flow • Additional surface water flow • All water drains to a wetland

  3. Contributing Area

  4. Erosion • Erosion - is the process by which soil and rock are removed from the Earth's surface by natural processes such as wind or water flow, and then transported and deposited in other locations • Most noticeable source of erosion: water runoff/drainage • Influencing factors to erosion: vegetation cover, topography, soil structure, and quantity of water

  5. Agricultural Practices • Livestock Grazing • Tillage • Hillside Farming • Drain Tile

  6. Materials • Total Station • Prism Rod • Global Positioning System • Geographic Information System • Microsoft Excel • Field Notebook • Pitchfork • Knee Boots

  7. Methods: Data Collection • Visual inspection of site • Revealed slight long-term erosion and very severe erosion • Total Station for collecting elevation information • Recorded Horizontal Angle, Horizontal Distance, Vertical Distance, and sufficient notes • Benchmark set as 100 feet • 4 groups of foreshots: undisturbed terrain, slightly eroded terrain, 2 sets to define the aggressive erosion

  8. Four Groups of Foreshots

  9. Methods: ArcMap Analysis • IDW interpolation of digital elevation models (DEM) • Predicted • Actual • Use break lines in interpolation for increased accuracy • Gully edge for actual elevation model • Gully centerline for predicted elevation model • Predicted elevation model excluded the points from the bottom of the gully • Raster calculator subtracting cell values of the DEMs • Surface volume calculation • Contributing area determination and calculation

  10. From Tile Exit to Bottom • 430 feet long • 16.5 vertical feet • 5 vertical feet from south edge to tile exit

  11. Results • 8,659.7 cubic feet removed • 2.9 cubic feet not removed • 94 acres contributing to runoff

  12. Analysis • IDW vs. Spline interpolation • Dirt 'not' eroded • Non-erodablematerials

  13. Implications • 12 inches of snow + 0.5 inch of rain = 683,000 cubic feet (5.1 million gallons) • Melt and drain in 5 days • Impermeable frost layer or saturated ground = 1.5 cubic feet per second (average) • Reasonably double, or more, at times

  14. Geeky Stuff • 2 feet high column of water exerts 1 psi. • Assume water flows at 2 feet/second = 1.5+ feet cross section of water = 216+ square inches • Pressure adds up quickly

  15. Questions??

More Related