1 / 9

Robotics & Imagining Systems

This workshop focused on the future of robotic greenhouses, emphasizing the urgent need for cost-effective automation from seed to table. Participants explored critical industry needs, including methods to cut costs and increase competitiveness within the next five years. By shifting from traditional square meter thinking to innovative cubic meter designs, the potential for up to 3.5 times cost savings was highlighted. The discussions centered around the science and technology necessary for efficient enclosed cultivation, integrating robotics, artificial intelligence, and automation for sustainable production.

guang
Télécharger la présentation

Robotics & Imagining Systems

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Robotics & Imagining Systems Working Group I Autonomous Robotic Greenhouse Workshop II Guelph, Ontario 8 September 2005

  2. What Industry Needs • Near-term requirements: • Cutting costs to remain competitive for the next 5 years • Biggest costs–harvesting! • Longer-term considerations: • Stop thinking in square metres; start thinking in cubic metres • Cost savings up to 3.5x • The future is 3D greenhousing! • Return-on-investment horizon: Less than 3 years

  3. Automation Automonous Robotic Greenhouse The Storyline. . . Economics Need CFI

  4. The Grand Mission. . . • To automate growing operations from seed to table

  5. The Big Question. . . • What is the science and technology required to enable cost-efficient growing operations in enclosed systems? • Logistics (moving plants vs moving equipment) • Energy considerations • Artificial intelligence • Sensing & automation • Robotics

  6. Focus of Proposal • Development of science and technology to realize the 3D greenhouse of the future • Comparison of future conventional greenhouse operations to 3D greenhouse operations • Infrastructure: • Conventional greenhouse • Baseline 3D greenhouse, suitable for innovative experimentation • Robotic and automated systems

  7. Academia Gov't Gov't Academia Gov't Academia Academia Industry Academia Academia Industry Industry Academia Academia Academia Gov't Gov't Academia Gov't Industry Academia Academia Declared Interests • OGVG, YorkU (3D greenhousing) • OMA (cost-effective production) • UofWindsor, NRC IMTI, YorkU (virtual greenhouse modeling) • Neptec, UofGuelph, UWO (imaging) • Unisearch, UTMIE (3D gas analysis) • Honey Electric (systems integration) • UofGuelph, UTIAS, YorkU, NRC IMTI, OCE (robotics) • Niagara College (photonics) • NRC IMTI (post-harvest operations) • EMS, UofGuelph, UofWindsor (plant-health monitoring)

  8. Let’s Grow Together!

  9. OCE: Fred Christie, Steve Colbert NRC IMTI: Peter Orban UofWindsor: Jonathan Wu UofGuelph: Bernie Grodzinski, Hussein Abdullah, Javaid Iqhal YorkU: Mavin Mandelbaum OGVG: Shallim Khosla Hydrorganic Greenhouse: Ed Casteels Unisearch: Doug Beynon Niagara College: Christine Bradaric-Baus, Marti Jurmain UWO: John Barron EMS: Andrew Bell Honey Electric: Reg MacDonald UTMIE: Reza Mani UTIAS: Gabriele D’Eleuterio Participants

More Related