370 likes | 384 Vues
Word Spotting DTW. Word Spot DTW. Introduction The Basic Idea Pruning DTW Matching Words With DTW Experimental Results Summary. Introduction. Libraries contain an enormous amount of hand-written historical documents. They would like to make it available electronically.
E N D
Word Spot DTW • Introduction • The Basic Idea • Pruning • DTW • Matching Words With DTW • Experimental Results • Summary
Introduction • Libraries contain an enormous amount of hand-written historical documents. • They would like to make it available electronically. • such large collections can only be accessed efficiently if a searchable index exist. • The current state-of-the-art approach is to manually create an index.
Introduction – cont. • The quality of historical documents is degraded due to faded ink, stained paper, etc. • Traditional Optical Character Recognition (OCR) techniques that usually recognize words character-by-character, fail.
The Basic Idea • For handwritten manuscripts written by a single author - the images of multiple instances of the same word are likely to look similar. • Word spotting idea provides an alternative approach to index generation.
Word Spotting • Each page in the document collection is segmented into words. • The different instances of a word are clustered together using image matching. • A human can tag the n most interesting clusters for indexing with the appropriate ASCII equivalent.
Matching • Good matching performance can be achieved by: • A technique that skews, resizes and aligns two candidate words. • Compares the words pixel-by-pixel. • We will use DTW.
Pruning • Running a matching algorithm is expensive with growing collection sizes. • Pruning techniques which can discard unlikely matches are used.
Pruning Techniques • Pruning of word pairs based on the area and aspect ratio of their bounding boxes. • Require words to have the same number of descenders (strokes below the baseline). • The idea is to require similar pruning statistics.
Ascenders Upper Baseline Lower Baseline Descenders
DTW • Used to compute a distance between two time series. • A time series is a list of samples taken from a signal ordered by time. • Naive approach: resample one of them and then compare the series sample-by-sample. • does not produce intuitive results, as it compares samples that might not correspond well.
DTW • Recovering optimal alignments between sample points in the two time series. • Demonstrates: time
Comparison between Naive & DTW i i i+2 i i time time Any distance (Euclidean, Manhattan, …) which aligns the i-th point on one time series with the i-th point on the other will produce apoor similarity score. A non-linear (elastic) alignment produces amore intuitive similarity measure, allowing similar shapes to match even if they are out of phase in the time axis.
DTW • The DTW-distance between two time series Xi . . . Xm and Yi . . . Yn is D(m,n). • D(i,j)= min {D(i,j-1),D(i-1,j),D(i-1,j-1)} + d(i,j) • d(i,j) varies with the application. • This calculation realizes a local continuity constraint.
Warping Function Time Series A is 1 n m pk To find the best alignment between A and B one needs to find the path through the grid P = p1, … , ps , … , pk ps= (is,js) which minimizes the total distance between them. Pis called a warping function. js ps Time Series B p1 1
Time-Normalized Distance Measure Time Series A Time-normalized distance between A and B: is 1 n m pk D(A ,B)= d(ps): distance betweenisandjs ws > 0:weighting coefficient. js ps Best alignment path between A and B: P0 = (D(A ,B)). Time Series B p1 1
Matching words with DTW • The inter-character and intra-character spacing is subject to larger variations. • DTW offers a more flexible way compensate for these variations than linear scaling. • We first normalize the slant and skew angle of candidate images. • From each word, four features per image column are extracted and combined into a single time series.
Matching Words With DTW • For each image I with height h and width w, we extract a time series: • X(I) = x1….xw. • xi = f1(I,i),f2(I,i),f3(I,i),f4(I,i). • fk = four extracted features per image column.
Matching Words With DTW • In order to run the DTW algorithm on two time series X(I) and Y(J), we define a local distance function: • d(xi,yj ) = ∑ (fk(I,i)-fk(J,j))² • Now, the DTW algorithm can be run to determine a warping path between X and Y: • D(X,Y) = ∑ d(xik,yjk )
DTW Features • Projection Profiles • Word Profiles • Upper word profiles • Lower word profiles • Background/Ink transitions
Projection Profile • Projection profile capture the distribution of ink along one dimension in a word image. • A vertical projection profile is computed by summing the intensity values in each image column separately: • PP(I,c) = ∑(255-I(r,c)) h r=1
(a) original image: slant/skew/baseline-normalized, cleaned. (b) normalized projection profile.
Word Profiles • Word profiles capture part of the outlining shape of a word. • Using upper and lower word profiles. • Going along the upper (lower) boundary of a word’s bounding box. • Recording for each image column the distance to the nearest “ink” pixel in that column.
Word Profiles • Due to a number of factors, some image columns may not contain ink pixels. • Therefore, these gaps are closed by linearly interpolating between the two closest points.
Background/Ink Transitions • A capture of the inner structure of a word is missing. • Records for every image column, the number of transitions from the background to ink pixels: • Determined by threshold. • nbit(I, c).
Experimental Results • Data sets and processing • Results
Data Sets And Processing • conducted on two test sets of different quality • Acceptable quality (set 1). • Very degraded quality (set 2). • Divide the test to four sets: • 15 images in test set 1. • Entire test set 1. • 32 images in test set 2. • Entire test set 2.
Results • SC • Shape context matching. • XOR • The images are aligned to compensate for shear and scale changes and then a difference image is computed. • EDM • Euclidean distance map. Larger regions are weighted more heavily.
Summary & Conclusions • DTW approach perform better than a number of other techniques. • Accuracy. • Speed. • The future work will focus on improvements in speed and accuracy. • Pruning. • Optimizations in DTW.