1 / 26

Board of County Commissioners

Board of County Commissioners. PUBLIC HEARING. April 20, 2010. Board of County Commissioners. District #: 4 Case #: RZ-08-08-061 Applicant: H. Scott Gold & Thomas A. Cloud for Winegard Road South PD Request: I-1A (Restricted Industrial District),

guinevere-pollard
Télécharger la présentation

Board of County Commissioners

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Board of County Commissioners PUBLIC HEARING April 20, 2010

  2. Board of County Commissioners District #:4 Case #:RZ-08-08-061 Applicant:H. Scott Gold & Thomas A. Cloud for WinegardRoad South PD Request:I-1A (Restricted Industrial District), I-2/I-3 (Industrial District-General), and PD (Planned Development District) to PD (Planned Development District)

  3. Board of County Commissioners Proposed Use:Office (P-O uses): up to 35,000 sq. ft. Commercial (C-1 uses): up to 175,000 sq. ft. Industrial (I-1A uses): up to 650,000 sq, ft. Industrial (I-2/I-3 uses): up to 950,000 sq. ft.

  4. Board of County Commissioners RZ-08-08-061 Zoning Map

  5. Board of County Commissioners RZ-08-08-061 Future Land Use Map

  6. Board of County Commissioners Winegard Road South Land Use Plan

  7. Board of County Commissioners DRC Recommendation • Make a finding of consistency with the Comprehensive Plan and Approve the PD zoning subject to the following conditions:

  8. Board of County Commissioners DRC Conditions of Approval 1. Development shall conform to the Winegard Road South PD Land Use Plan dated “Received December 28, 2009,” and shall comply with all applicable federal, state and county laws, ordinances and regulations, except to the extent that any applicable county laws, ordinances or regulations are expressly waived or modified by any of these conditions. Accordingly, the PD may be developed in accordance with the uses, densities and intensities described in such Land Use Plan, subject to those uses, densities and intensities conforming with the restrictions and requirements found in the conditions of approval and complying with all applicable federal, state and county laws, ordinance and regulations, except to the extent that any applicable county laws, ordinances or regulations are expressly waived or modified by any of these conditions. If the development is unable to achieve or obtain desired uses, densities or intensities, the County is not under any obligation to grant any waivers or modifications to enable the developer to achieve or obtain those desired uses, densities or intensities. In the event of a conflict or inconsistency between a condition of approval of this zoning and the land use plan dated "Received December 28, 2009," the condition of approval shall control to the extent of such conflict or inconsistency.

  9. Board of County Commissioners DRC Conditions of Approval Cont’d. 2. This project shall comply with, adhere to, and not deviate from or otherwise conflict with any verbal or written promise or representation made by the applicant (or authorized agent) to the Board of County Commissioners at the public hearing where this development was approved, where such promise or representation, whether oral or written, was relied upon by the Board in approving the development, could have reasonably been expected to have been relied upon by the Board in approving the development, or could have reasonably induced or otherwise influenced the Board to approve the development. For purposes of this condition, a “promise” or “representation” shall be deemed to have been made to the Board by the applicant (or authorized agent) if it was expressly made to the Board at a public hearing where the development was considered or approved. 3. All acreages regarding conservation areas and wetland buffers are considered approximate until finalized by a Conservation Area Determination (CAD) and a Conservation Area Impact (CAI) Permit. Approval of this plan does not authorize any direct or indirect conservation area impacts.

  10. Board of County Commissioners DRC Conditions of Approval Cont’d. • Pole signs and new billboards shall be prohibited. Ground and fascia signs shall comply with Ch. 31.5. Existing billboards shall be removed at the end of the current leases. No extensions of the current leases shall be permitted beyond July 2013. • Outdoor storage and display shall be prohibited in those areas designated Commercial, Office, and/or I-1A uses. • Tree removal/earthwork shall not occur unless and until construction plans for the first Preliminary Subdivision and/or Development Plan, with a tree removal and mitigation plan, have been approved by Orange County. • The Developer shall obtain wastewater service from Orange County Utilities. • A master wastewater plan including preliminary calculations shall be • approved prior to approval of construction plans.

  11. Board of County Commissioners DRC Conditions of Approval Cont’d. • The total number of parking stalls provided shall not exceed 110 percent of the minimum required by Code. • Unless a Conservation Area Impact (CAI) Permit is approved by Orange County consistent with Chapter 15 prior to Construction Plan approval, no conservation area encroachments are permitted.

  12. Board of County Commissioners P&ZC Recommendation • Make a finding of consistency with the Comprehensive Plan and approve the PD zoning, subject to ten (10) conditions.

  13. Board of County Commissioners Action Requested • Find the request consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and approve the Winegard Road South PD Land Use Plan dated “Received December 28, 2009,” subject to the ten (10) conditions as stated in the Planning and Zoning Recommendations of the staff report.

  14. Board of County Commissioners Project : Orangewood PD/LUP (Neighborhood-2) - Substantial Change Applicant:Sam Sebaali District #: 1 Request: To consider a substantial change to the approved Orangewood Planned Development/Land Use Plan (PD/LUP)(Neighborhood-2) to allow for an additional “right-in only” access from International Drive South.

  15. Board of County Commissioners Zoning Map

  16. Board of County Commissioners Future Land Use Map

  17. Board of County Commissioners Orangewood (N-2) Land Use Plan

  18. Board of County Commissioners Action Requested • Find the request consistent with the Comprehensive Policy Plan and approve the Substantial Change to the approved Orangewood PD/LUP (Neighborhood-2) dated “Received February 19, 2010,” subject to the four (4) conditions in the staff report.

  19. Board of County Commissioners DRC Recommendations 1. Development shall conform to the Orangewood PD (Neighborhood-2) Land Use Plan dated “Received August 11, 2009February 19, 2010,” and shall comply with all applicable federal, state and county laws, ordinances and regulations, except to the extent that any applicable county laws, ordinances or regulations are expressly waived or modified by any of these conditions. Accordingly, the PD may be developed in accordance with the uses, densities and intensities described in such Land Use Plan, subject to those uses, densities and intensities conforming with the restrictions and requirements found in the conditions of approval and complying with all applicable federal, state and county laws, ordinance and regulations, except to the extent that any applicable county laws, ordinances or regulations are expressly waived or modified by any of these conditions. If the development is unable to achieve or obtain desired uses, densities or intensities, the County is not under any obligation to grant any waivers or modifications to enable the developer to achieve or obtain those desired uses, densities or intensities. In the event of a conflict or inconsistency between a condition of approval of this zoning and the land use plan dated "Received August 11, 2009February 19, 2010," the condition of approval shall control to the extent of such conflict or inconsistency.

  20. Board of County Commissioners DRC Recommendations Cont’d. 2. This project shall comply with, adhere to, and not deviate from or otherwise conflict with any verbal or written promise or representation made by the applicant (or authorized agent) to the Board of County Commissioners at the public hearing where this development was approved, where such promise or representation, whether oral or written, was relied upon by the Board in approving the development, could have reasonably been expected to have been relied upon by the Board in approving the development, or could have reasonably induced or otherwise influenced the Board to approve the development. For purposes of this condition, a “promise” or “representation” shall be deemed to have been made to the Board by the applicant (or authorized agent) if it was expressly made to the Board at a public hearing where the development was considered or approved. 3. An additional access driveway is approved for a right-in access only. No future right-out access is approved at this location without a change to the Land Use Plan and approval by the Board of this change request. 4. All previous applicable Conditions of Approval shall apply.

  21. Board of County Commissioners Project : Le Royal PD/LUP - Substantial Change Applicant:Jim Hall District #: 1 Request: To consider a substantial change to the approved Le Royal Planned Development/Land Use Plan (PD/LUP) to: (1) Increase the number of residential lots from 19 to 50; (2) Reduce the minimum lot width from 85 feet to 75 feet; and (3) Decrease the minimum lot area from 15,000 square feet to 7,500 square feet.

  22. Board of County Commissioners Zoning Map

  23. Board of County Commissioners Future Land Use Map

  24. Board of County Commissioners Le Royal Land Use Plan

  25. Board of County Commissioners Action Requested • The applicant has requested that this item be continued until May 11, 2010.

  26. Board of County Commissioners PUBLIC HEARING

More Related