1 / 22

New control system – pilot project SE1

New control system – pilot project SE1. S. Poulsen ST-EL-CO STTC November 12th, 2002. Overview. Introduction Problem Project Result Conclusions Future. Introduction. Overview Present pilot project LHC 1 Make general conclusions Propose future activities. Situation 1999 LHC 1.

gus
Télécharger la présentation

New control system – pilot project SE1

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. New control system – pilot project SE1 S. Poulsen ST-EL-CO STTC November 12th, 2002

  2. Overview • Introduction • Problem • Project • Result • Conclusions • Future

  3. Introduction • Overview • Present pilot project LHC 1 • Make general conclusions • Propose future activities

  4. Situation 1999 LHC 1 • Substation controlled with CERN Technology (ST and SL divisions) • MICENE interface to most equipment • Data acquisition developed at CERN in 80s • Some equipment with modern protection • LEP-wide concept and technology for electrical equipment and control

  5. Problems in 1999 • CERN LEP technology obsolete and discontinued • Repairs and configuration changes difficult or impossible • Control experts close to retirement • Complicated integration with new industrial electrical SCADA system • Performance degrading • Conclusion : Future uncertain !

  6. Proposal • Pilot project using industrial technology • Proposal selected from supplier of SCADA system for integration and cost reason • Constraints • No development of hardware • No major re-cabling of electrical equipment • Reuse of MICENE interconnection chassis’

  7. Technical solution (in blue)

  8. Project Documentation • Before: Project note issued • Define scope and boundaries • Define hardware requirements • Define functionality • Define practical implementation issues • After: Project conclusion issued • Status report and major conclusions

  9. Lessons learnt • Modification of switchboards for measurement time consuming and impractical • Interconnection cables with equipment critical • Chassis re-cabling difficult • Co-ordination between CERN and supplier difficult during installation

  10. Improvements for future ! • Concentrate power measurements in rack or in one device per switchboard (LV) • Include critical interconnection cables in supply • Minimise interconnection chassis re-cabling • Prepare installation completely before intervention of supplier

  11. Additional results • Local visualization of substation status in synoptic • Local logging of events (no risk of communication network outage) • Local visualization of measurements for MV and some LV via dedicated power measurement modules

  12. Long-term performance • Reliability satisfactory guarantee period • Problems solved quickly • Regular new software versions installed by supplier • No major maintenance by CERN except restarting the system occasionally

  13. General Architecture based on pilot

  14. Perspectives LHC 1–2002/2003End of prototype • New cryogenics substation with modern protection to be integrated • New switchboard in SEM11 with modern protection (no extra controls hardware) • Reconfiguration of control system offered at CHF 4000 (foreseen in frame contract !) • Recycling of original data acquisition hardware installed for prototype

  15. Related activities initiated after pilot • On-going control renovation program over 5 years • Done: Complete upgrade in LHC 1, LHC 4, LHC 5, LHC 6, LHC 8, BE, BE9, SM18, ME9 (LHC 1 to be redone) • Done: Partial upgrade in BA1, BA2, BA3, BA4, BA5, BA6, BA7 but MICENEs not yet replaced (BA4 scheduled for 2003) • Not Done:Underground will follow equipment installation and communication infrastructure, LHC 2, (3 and 7)

  16. Conclusions 1Disadvantages of approach • Limited control over contractors staff, schedule, etc. • Less flexibility (contractual terms) • Less reactivity (contract changes difficult !) • Specific software difficult to debug off-site • Difficult to have special functionalities • Quality control important (ISO not sufficient…) • Risks : Future of supplier ? Suppliers strategy ? CERN strategy ? The technology ? The LHC requirements ? In 10 years ? Integration with CERN systems ?

  17. Conclusions 1Advantages of approach • Results based ! • Responsibility of problems clear ! • Reliability satisfactory • Industrial hardware cost effective • Changes are possible (if paid…) • Knowledge of system not “owned” by CERN personnel • Technology not CERN specific (training fast and cost effective)

  18. Main conclusions of pilot • Industrial control equipment can be used at CERN • Work can be formed by small team with help of contractors and limited industrial support • Contractors can assist execution with simple well-defined tasks but not tasks that need experience and management of complexity • In the future choices have to be made about priorities. We cannot control all equipment and we have to decide where to concentrate !

  19. Future activities - 1 • Training • Electrical operation personnel and operators • Training investment proportional to investment in system • More important with industrial systems since knowledge comes from outside firm and development is separated from CERN • Best way of learning is “doing”

  20. Future activities - 2 • Energy management • SEPAMs and power measurement modules provide information about power consumption on a feeder basis down to LV switchboards • Information presented in Web pages or customised energy reports • Use information for forecasting, monitoring and maybe more efficient operation

  21. Future activities - 3 • Integration of electrical control in ST infrastructure • Done: Transmission of signals for real-time monitoring via TDS • To do: Exchange of information for off-line analysis (data logging and events). Data format and structure to be discussed • Probably other issues for discussion in CSWG

  22. Thank you ! • Hope to have answered your questions ? • Any more questions now or later ? • S. Poulsen (contract manager) • J.-C. Gallois (energy and installation) • G. Burdet (field buses, PLCs and software)

More Related