1 / 24

Research Methods User Group - UB Staff

Research Methods User Group - UB Staff. Arabella Crawford Tanisha Hamilton David Pepper. Introduction. Groups Who We Interviewed Goal of Site Redesign Project Big Picture. Group 1 - Nomads. Nomads Relatively New to UB Migrant (changes jobs often) May have worked at multiple Univs.

gusty
Télécharger la présentation

Research Methods User Group - UB Staff

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Research MethodsUser Group - UB Staff Arabella CrawfordTanisha Hamilton David Pepper

  2. Introduction • Groups • Who We Interviewed • Goal of Site Redesign Project • Big Picture

  3. Group 1 - Nomads • Nomads • Relatively New to UB • Migrant (changes jobs often) • May have worked at multiple Univs. • Opportunistic

  4. Group 2 - Lifers • Lifers • Worked at UB/Higher Ed. >= 7 Years • Sedentary (keeps jobs for a long time) • Less likely to have worked at multiple universities • Has faith in and is invested in “Seniority”

  5. Who We Interviewed(by Groups) • P1: Jeremy - Nomad • P2: Jennifer - Nomad • P3: June - Lifer • P4: Blair (Male) - Lifer

  6. Goals of Site Redesign Project • Implement CMS-driven architecture over whole site (like existing home page) • Cold Fusion-based • More “User-driven” • Capitalize on opportunity of technical redesign to reorganize content • Reduce phone calls & Emails regarding site • Help people “Get To” information • Quicker • Easier

  7. Categorization of Nav. seen as an improvement Colors seem to please people Prominence of Events seen as good Logo Prominence = Brand = Good Big Picture: People Like theNew Design P1: Jeremy (:48) P3: June (1:09)

  8. Issues • Navigation Issues • Directory Issues • Layout Issues

  9. Navigation Issues • Primary Navigation (seen as good, i.e. only minor issues) • “Categories” seen as significant improvement • P1: “[each column] has the top seven or eight links that you would need to get to” • P2: “Your eye is drawn to exactly who you are”

  10. Navigation Issues • Primary Navigation (continued) • “Categories” seen as significant improvement • P3: “It seems like there’s a lot more choices underneath the main titles than…before” • P4: “[the roll-over menus] do keep the page ‘cleaner’”

  11. Navigation Issues (Continued) • Secondary Navigation (three major issues) • Content • Seems to be a legacy of the old website, rather than part of the new site • Changes from page to page, but not in “harmony” with new primary navigation • Seems to be intended to be a “sand-box”, driven by stakeholders, i.e. localized items of interest

  12. Navigation Issues (Continued) “Sand-box” Example

  13. Navigation Issues (Continued) • Secondary Nav. (major issues) • Multi-nav • Users tended to make round-trips from primary, to secondary, to “top nav” looking for information

  14. Navigation Issues (Continued) • Secondary Navigation (major issues) • Color-cycling: Colors of elements on pages sometimes change for no certain reason from page to page

  15. Directory Issues • PDF File • No bookmarks • Find vs. Search • Find is directional (previous/next) • Basically, you need to know what/who you are looking for P1: Jeremy (2:17)

  16. Directory Issues (continued) • PDF File • Task 7: Find Email address for IDIA Director • P1: 3:22 NO • P2: 2:02 YES • P3: 2:07 YES • P4: 2:01 NO P1: “having to scroll through 49 pages just to find one office could be a bit tedious...and time consuming”

  17. Layout Issues • Layout • Secondary Navigation • Part of it is “Below the fold” (forces scrolling) • Prominence of Events • Dominates “Above the fold” • “Upcoming Events” not obviously a link • Picture is really just a usability obstacle for daily users

  18. Recommendations • Navigation • Directory • Layout

  19. Navigation Recommendations • Revise Navigation • Primary Nav. Needs to be modified to include all content formerly located in the secondary nav. • If that can’t be done, it’s not the primary nav. and/or the secondary nav. is not the secondary nav. • Left Nav. should be topical to each page • i.e. Subordinate to Primary Nav.

  20. Navigation Recommendations • Navigation (continued) • Primary Nav. should contain “destinations”, each of which have their own secondary nav. (creating “harmony”) • Remove “Old” secondary navigation items • Create “quick links” nav on homepage

  21. Directory Recommendations • Create an online, searchable, dynamic directory for faculty and staff • Allow for partial name searches

  22. Layout Recommendations • Layout • Demote events bar • Move picture • Promote Secondary Navigation • Style “Upcoming Events” to clarify that it is a link

  23. Layout Recommendations • Layout (continued) • Reconsider color changes to Events and Secondary Navs.

  24. Conclusion • Few changes = Big payoff • Navigation issues must be resolved for the new site to be useful (tough-love) • A searchable directory would be a huge service to the community (a universal tool) • In the mean time add bookmarks to the PDF • Layout changes should be mainly style-sheet changes

More Related