1 / 7

Report on CCHE Performance Contract Negotiations

Report on CCHE Performance Contract Negotiations. Jack O. Burns, Ph.D. Vice President for Academic Affairs & Research January 25, 2005. Access. Guaranteed admission to a CU campus Greater access for academically qualified under-represented students

gwydion
Télécharger la présentation

Report on CCHE Performance Contract Negotiations

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Report on CCHE Performance Contract Negotiations Jack O. Burns, Ph.D. Vice President for Academic Affairs & Research January 25, 2005

  2. Access • Guaranteed admission to a CU campus • Greater access for academically qualified under-represented students • Debt-free graduation for low income students • Increased transferability among Colorado institutions of higher education • Uphold state guaranteed core course transfer system • CU will submit relevant courses for GE-25 Council approval • GE-25 approved courses will be designated in course catalog • CU core courses notapproved by GE-25 Council will remain part of CU’s core, and will also be designated in course catalog

  3. Quality and Success • High level of student satisfaction with CU learning experience • High number of students engaged in activities leading to successful learning • High level of student achievement on national standardized tests • National recognition of CU’s high quality programs Additional goals to ensure “Quality and Success” have been established (continued on next slide)

  4. Quality and Success • Increased student retention and graduation rates • By June 2009, increase freshmen retention rate by at least 1% • Enhanced academic rigor • Institution will put in place initiatives to enhance rigor of undergraduate education • Report annually to CCHE on initiatives and on-going programs • Provide supporting data to CCHE • Maintain high quality faculty • Board policies require merit as prevailing factor in all salary increases • Annual information on faculty salaries will be provided to CCHE in same format as made available to Board

  5. Addressing State Needs • Enrichment of state economy • Provide undergraduate, graduate, and professional training to meet areas of state need • Meet the need for well-prepared K-12 teachers • When possible, maximize student teaching placement in diverse settings • Content courses for secondary education licensure are taught by faculty in discipline, or by department approved faculty • Report on recruitment, retention, and graduation of under-represented teacher candidates (particularly Hispanics and males) • Participation with CCHE in analysis of teacher candidate placement and performance

  6. Efficiency • Shared Responsibility – State, Students and their Families, and Institutional Resources – i.e. Fundraising, Non-Resident Tuition • Mandated Cost Increases– Salaries, Insurance, Utilities, Financial Aid, Enrollment Growth and Inflation • Base Adequacy – Tuition differentials over mandated costs to provide investment funds in new academic initiatives • Administrative Costs – Benchmarked against peer institutions to insure reasonableness • Alternative Resource Generation – Private Fundraising, Technology Transfer, Grants and Contracts • Controlled Maintenance – Governing Board to consider whether or not to assess a fee or allocate a portion of tuition to address identified needs

  7. Flexibility Gained from CCHE • Program Approval: Only review of role and mission consistency • Off-Campus Instruction: Only review of role and mission consistency • Capital Construction:Reduced CCHE oversight for smaller projects (less than $500k) • No CCHE Approval Required for: • Academic Planning • Facilities Master Planning

More Related