1 / 20

A NEW MODELING & DESIGN APPROACH FOR WIRELESS CHANNELS WITH PREDICTABLE PATH GEOMETRIES

A NEW MODELING & DESIGN APPROACH FOR WIRELESS CHANNELS WITH PREDICTABLE PATH GEOMETRIES. Narayan B. Mandayam. Challenges in Enabling Wireless Data. Wireless Data is uneconomical in cellular like systems v cents / min of voice = 13v cents/Mbyte of Data

hagen
Télécharger la présentation

A NEW MODELING & DESIGN APPROACH FOR WIRELESS CHANNELS WITH PREDICTABLE PATH GEOMETRIES

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. A NEW MODELING & DESIGN APPROACH FOR WIRELESS CHANNELS WITH PREDICTABLE PATH GEOMETRIES Narayan B. Mandayam

  2. Challenges in Enabling Wireless Data • Wireless Data is uneconomical in cellular like systems • v cents / min of voice = 13v cents/Mbyte of Data • “Free” Bits – the real challenge of the wireless internet • Need “Many-Time Many-Where” solutions as opposed to “Any-Time Any-Where”

  3. Maps and images Music, voicemail, news Internetaccess InfostationsA system of sweet spots for “free” bits • Small, separated “cells” • Low power (~100 mw) • Brief connections (~1 sec) • Very high bit rate (~1 G bps) • Simple infrastructure (LAN on a pole, IP access) • Unlicensed bands

  4. Maps and images Music, voicemail, news Transmitter Receiver ??? Why New ? • Cellular systemsInfostations • - Power (>=1W) - Low power (~100mW) • - Low bit rates - Very high bit rates • - Connectivity always, - Brief connections (~seconds), • everywhere localized • Narrowband - Wideband (e.g., U-NII bands,100MHz) • - Large distances (~ km) - Short range (<20m)

  5. Modeling Approach Stochastic approach (wide-area cellular) Deterministic approach (indoor wireless) Ray-tracing (Valenzuela, Rappaport, ...) Measurements (Greenstein, COST, Rappaport, Hata, ...) Deterministic-plus-stochastic approach Ray-tracing AND Measurements • Predictable user behavior (trajectory) • Short-range • No shadowing • LOS always present + Possible scatter

  6. Methodology • SCENARIOS (Account for different environments) • POSTULATED RESPONSES (Ray-tracing – geometry, antenna patterns, reflection coefficients) • MEASUREMENTS (Moving antenna and fixed antenna experiments) • CHANNEL MODEL (Refine the postulated response with model of the scatter component)

  7. Infostations Channel Modeling Domazetovic Greenstein Mandayam Seskar Scenario 2: 4-ray model - channel almost Gaussian Scenario 1: 2-ray model - channel almost Gaussian Scenario 3: Ricean channel - K ~ 10 dB

  8. Measurements Moving antenna Fixed antenna • Measure path gain vs. distance • Confirm ray-tracing approach • Measure time variations • Augment deterministic model with stochastic component

  9. Scenario 1: Open Roadway with Trees Stochastic Deterministic dt – ground distance between antennas Deterministiccomponent a (dt) + b (dt) Delay, t (dt) IN OUT Time-varying scatter

  10. Scenario 1: Deterministic component model f LOS q f Mobile antenna height hm q Base antenna height hb GR q q q dt q dt d user trajectory - d R – reflection coefficient g – antenna gains

  11. Scenario 1: Stochastic component model h(dt,t) – zero mean, complex Gaussian with standard deviation s [derived from measurements]

  12. Scenario 1: Path Gain vs. Distance

  13. Deterministiccomponent a + IN b Delay, t OUT 1 1 b Delay, t 2 2 b Delay, t 3 3 Time-varying scatter Scenario 2: Roadway with Buildings on the Sides Stochastic Deterministic

  14. Scenario 2: Path Gain vs. Distance

  15. Deterministiccomponent + IN a OUT Space-varying scatter Scenario 3: Parking Lot h(dt,t) – zero mean, complex Gaussian with standard deviation s changing with user position Stochastic Deterministic

  16. Scenario 3: Path Gain vs. Distance Ricean process with K factor constant over distance K ~ 10 dB

  17. Refining the Channel Models • Power measurements insufficient to characterize the stochastic part of the channel • Stochastic part characterization critical for simulation => Reasonable assumptions need to be made 1. Power decay profile: “Spike + Exponential” 2. RMS delay spread: Channels 1 & 2: 5 ns for EXP part Channel 3: Case I; Low: 2 ns (5ns for EXP) Case II; High: 20 ns (50 ns for EXP) – ref. Linnartz

  18. Infostations Modem Design Patel Mandayam Seskar Ideal matched filter sufficient for lower order MQAM “GOOD” CHANNELS Two-ray model - channel SC+Equalization or OFDM+Channel Est. with low complexity required for higher order MQAM Four-ray model - channel “BAD” CHANNELS Ideal matched filter not sufficient Ricean channel - K ~ 10 dB SC+Equalization or OFDM+Channel Est. with higher complexity required OBJECTIVE : To design a low cost (complexity) receiver that can provide high data rates (order of 100s of Mbps) under different channel conditions within 20m

  19. Modem: Infostation Proposals • Matched filter receiver: • Channels 1 and 2, low rates only • Low implementation complexity • Low complexity OFDM or SC+DFE Equalization Systems: • Channels 1, 2 and 3: Case I only • Channel perfectly known: • SC slightly better than OFDM systems • Channel unknown: • OFDM systems outperform SC systems • 2.5 % training overhead sufficient • High complexity OFDM systems: • All channels • 5 % training overhead required

  20. Example Applications Above results for rate 3/4 coded OFDM system with 64-QAMmodulation scheme

More Related