1 / 14

Bandwidth Allocation in Networks with Multiple Interferences

Bandwidth Allocation in Networks with Multiple Interferences. Reuven Bar- Yehuda Gleb Polevoy Dror Rawitz Technion. The Model. Base Stations {1,2,… , i ,…,n} Interferences  ( i ) <1 Users {1,2,…,j,…,m} Frequencies {1,2,…,t,…,f}

hagen
Télécharger la présentation

Bandwidth Allocation in Networks with Multiple Interferences

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Bandwidth Allocation in Networks with Multiple Interferences Reuven Bar-Yehuda GlebPolevoy DrorRawitz Technion

  2. The Model Base Stations {1,2,…,i,…,n} • Interferences (i) <1 Users {1,2,…,j,…,m} Frequencies {1,2,…,t,…,f} User j has a set of bandwidth requests from base station i: Rij={Iij1,…,Iijk,….} • Each request ijk has a profit Pijk>0 Optimization problem: Allocating subsets of demands with maximum profit s.t: • At most one demand per user • All demands satisfied by a base station are independent. • If t allocated by base i to user j then i Rij j

  3. The Local-Ratio Technique: Basic definitions Given a profit [penalty] vector p. Maximize[Minimize]p·x Subject to: feasibility constraints F(x) x isr-approximationif F(x) andp·x[]r·p·x* An algorithm is r-approximationif for any p, F it returns an r-approximation

  4. The Local-Ratio Theorem: xis an r-approximation with respect to p1 xis an r-approximation with respect to p- p1  xis an r-approximation with respect to p Proof: (For maximization) p1 · x  r ×p1* p2 · x  r ×p2*  p · x  r ×( p1*+ p2*)  r ×(p1 + p2 )*

  5. Special case: Optimization is 1-approximation xis an optimum with respect to p1 xis an optimum with respect to p- p1 xis an optimum with respect to p

  6. A Local-Ratio Schema for Maximization[Minimization] problems: Algorithm r-ApproxMax[Min]( Set, p ) If Set = Φ then returnΦ ; If  I  Setp(I)  0 then returnr-ApproxMax( Set-{I}, p ) ; [If I  Setp(I)=0 then return {I} r-ApproxMin( Set-{I}, p ) ;] Define “good” p1 ; REC = r-ApproxMax[Min]( S, p- p1) ; If REC is not an r-approximation w.r.t. p1 then “fix it”; return REC;

  7. The Local-Ratio Theorem: Applications Applications to some optimization algorithms (r = 1): ( MST) Minimum Spanning Tree (Kruskal) ( SHORTEST-PATH) s-t Shortest Path (Dijkstra) (LONGEST-PATH) s-t DAG Longest Path (Can be done with dynamic programming) (INTERVAL-IS) Independents-Set in Interval Graphs Usually done with dynamic programming) (LONG-SEQ) Longest (weighted) monotone subsequence (Can be done with dynamic programming) ( MIN_CUT) Minimum Capacity s,t Cut (e.g. Ford, Dinitz) Applications to some 2-Approximation algorithms: (r = 2) ( VC) Minimum Vertex Cover (Bar-Yehuda and Even) ( FVS) Vertex Feedback Set (Becker and Geiger) ( GSF) Generalized Steiner Forest (Williamson, Goemans, Mihail, and Vazirani) ( Min 2SAT) Minimum Two-Satisfibility (Gusfield and Pitt) ( 2VIP) Two Variable Integer Programming (Bar-Yehuda and Rawitz) ( PVC) Partial Vertex Cover (Bar-Yehuda) ( GVC) Generalized Vertex Cover (Bar-Yehuda and Rawitz) Applications to some other Approximations: ( SC) Minimum Set Cover (Bar-Yehuda and Even) ( PSC) Partial Set Cover (Bar-Yehuda) ( MSP) Maximum Set Packing (Arkin and Hasin) Applications Resource Allocation and Scheduling: ….

  8. Fatal interference, one request per user I99 I88 I77 I66 I55 I44 I33 I22 I11 Maximize s.t: For each instance I: For each time t: Rij = {Iij} i j

  9. Fatal interference, one request per user : How to select P1 to get optimization? P1=0 P1=1 P1=0 Activity9 Activity8 Activity7 Activity6 Activity5 Activity4 Activity3 Activity2 Activity1 Î time Let Î be an interval that ends first; 1 if I in conflict with Î For all intervals I define: p1(I) = 0 else For every feasible x: p1 ·x  1 Every Î-maximal is optimal. For every Î-maximal x: p1 ·x  1 P1=0 P1=0 P1=1 P1=0 P1=1 P1=1

  10. Fatal interference, one request per user: An Optimization Algorithm P1=P(Î ) P1=0 Activity9 Activity8 Activity7 Activity6 Activity5 Activity4 Activity3 Activity2 Activity1 Î time Algorithm MaxIS( S, p ) If S = Φ then returnΦ ; If ISp(I) 0 then returnMaxIS( S - {I}, p); Let ÎS that ends first; IS define: p1(I) = p(Î)  (I in conflict with Î) ; IS = MaxIS( S, p- p1) ; If IS isÎ-maximal then returnIS else return IS {Î}; P1=0 P1=0 P1=0 P1=P(Î ) P1=0 P1=P(Î ) P1=P(Î )

  11. Fatal interference, one request per user :Running Example P(I5) = 3 -4 P(I6) = 6 -4 -2 P(I3) = 5 -5 P(I2) = 3 -5 P(I1) = 5 -5 P(I4) = 9 -5 -4 -4 -5 -2

  12. Single Machine Scheduling : Bar-Noy, Guha, Naor and Schieber STOC 99: 1/2 LP Berman, DasGupta, STOC 00: 1/2 This Talk, STOC 00(Independent)      1/2 • Activity9 • Activity8 • Activity7 • Activity6 • Activity5 • Activity4 • Activity3 • Activity2 • Activity1 ????????????? • time • Maximize s.t.For each instance I: • For each time t: • For each activity A:

  13. Single Machine Scheduling: How to select P1 to get ½-approximation ? P1=1 P1=0 P1=0 P1=1 P1=0 P1=0 Activity9 Activity8 Activity7 Activity6 Activity5 Activity4 Activity3 Activity2 Activity 1 Î time Let Î be an interval that ends first; 1if I in conflict with Î 1 if I in conflict with Î For all intervals I define: p1(I) = 0 else For every feasible x: p1 ·x  2 Every Î-maximal is 1/2-approximation For every Î-maximal x: p1 ·x  1 P1=0 P1=0 P1=0 P1=0 P1=1 P1=0 P1=1 P1=0 P1=0 P1=1 P1=1 P1=1 P1=1 P1=1

  14. The ½-approximation Algorithm Activity9 Activity8 Activity7 Activity6 Activity5 Activity4 Activity3 Activity2 Activity1 Î time Algorithm MaxIS( S, p ) If S = Φ then returnΦ ; If ISp(I) 0 then returnMaxIS( S - {I}, p); Let ÎS that ends first; IS define: p1(I) = p(Î)  (I in conflict with Î) ; IS = MaxIS( S, p- p1) ; If IS isÎ-maximal then returnIS else return IS {Î};

More Related