1 / 15

Madison County Travel Demand Model

Madison County Travel Demand Model. Challenges and Innovations Diane B. Zimmerman, PE. Location Map. Madison County . Base Year 2000 2000 Population = 70,872 2000 Employment = 36,200 Future Year 2025 2025 Population =105,000 2025 Employment = 57,000. TAZ Map.

hailey
Télécharger la présentation

Madison County Travel Demand Model

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Madison County Travel Demand Model Challenges and Innovations Diane B. Zimmerman, PE

  2. Location Map

  3. Madison County • Base Year 2000 • 2000 Population = 70,872 • 2000 Employment = 36,200 • Future Year 2025 • 2025 Population =105,000 • 2025 Employment = 57,000

  4. TAZ Map • Combined the areas from the previous Richmond and Berea Models • 176 Internal Zones • 16 External Stations

  5. Richmond and Berea

  6. Highway Network • Imported from KY GIS coverage the Traffic Flow layer • Added the Federal Functional Class Layer • Added the Local Layer • Traced Interstates and ramps from the DOQQ

  7. Highway Network • Coded signal locations • Coded g/c ratios from sketch planning of signal timing • Capacity was computed link by link rather than by area/facility by TransCAD using procedures from NCHRP • Default properties were by area, then location specific data was added

  8. Trip Generation • Population Data from Census Block data • Employment Data from Employment Services, supplemented by phone calls to non-profit organizations and missing employers • NCHRP 365 procedures were used • E-I trips were converted to Productions at the External stations and Attractions to Internal zones • Student Trip rates were initially taken from the Lexington study and increased during calibration • A separate trip rate was used for Urban and Rural zones to reflect trip chaining in the urban areas

  9. Challenges • Two distinct small urban areas • Two Universities – Eastern Kentucky University and Berea College • Interstate 75 • Army munitions base • Major improvement to KY 52 west • New interchange on I-75

  10. Innovations • User Interface • Allows user to exactly replicate run made by JJG, similar to the MINUTP 00.bat file • Changes are made to the GISDK code or to the input files

  11. User Interface

  12. Calibration Results • Overall RMSE = 26.0% • VMT Difference = -0.9% • Urban -5.3% • Rural 2.8%

  13. RMSE Comparison

  14. VMT Comparison

  15. Special Thanks to Nick Uhren for all his work!

More Related