1 / 15

Experimental review of ADS and GLW methods

Experimental review of ADS and GLW methods. Pavel Krokovny KEK. Introduction Apparatus Methods Results Summary. Unitarity triangle. Using unitarity requirement :. sin2 φ 1 (β) is measured with a good accuracy at B-factories . Measurement of all the angles needed to test SM.

haines
Télécharger la présentation

Experimental review of ADS and GLW methods

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Experimental review of ADS and GLW methods Pavel Krokovny KEK Introduction Apparatus Methods Results Summary

  2. Unitarity triangle Using unitarity requirement: sin2φ1(β) is measured with a goodaccuracy atB-factories. Measurement of all the angles needed to testSM.

  3. B+ D0K+ decay Need to use the decay whereVubcontribution interferes with another weak vertex. B– D0K–:B– D0K–: If D0 and D0decay into the same final state, Relative phase: (B– DK–), (B+ DK+) includesweak (γ/φ3) and strong (δ) phase. Amplitude ratio:

  4. 4 equations (3 independent: ), 3 unknowns Gronau-London-Wyler method [Phys. Lett. B 253 (1991) 483] [Phys. Lett. B 265 (1991) 172] СР eigenstateofD-meson is used (DCP). CP-even : D1K+K–, π+ π– CP-odd : D2 KS π0, KS ω, KS φ, KSη… СР-asymmetry: forD1  A1,2of different signs forD2 Additional constraint:

  5. GLW method (Belle)

  6. GLW method (Belle) B± DK± decay: Belle results (253 fb-1) hep-ex/0601032 B+ D1K+ B- D1K- B± D*K±, D*Dπ0 decay: B+ D2K+ B- D2K- GLW analyses alone do not constrain γ/φ3 significantly yet, but can be combined with other measurements and provide information on rB

  7. GLW method (BaBar) BaBar results (211 fb-1) Phys.Rev. D73, 051105 , Phys.Rev. D72, 071103 B± DK± decay: rB2=-0.12±0.08(stat)±0.03(syst) B± DK*±, K*±KSπ±decay: rB2=0.30±0.25

  8. Atwood-Dunietz-Soni method D. Atwood, I. Dunietz and A. Soni, PRL 78, 3357 (1997); PRD 63, 036005 (2001) Enhancement of СР-violationdue to use ofCabibbo-suppressedD decays B–D0K–- color allowed D0K+π– - doublyCabibbo-suppressed B–D0K–- color suppressed D0K+π– - Cabibbo-allowed Interfering amplitudes are comparable 

  9. B+ -> D0[K-p+] p+ Peaking background from B+ -> K+p- p+decay. Using D sidebands to subtract it. After subtraction the signal yield is events ADS method (Belle) B+ -> D0[K+p-] p+

  10. ADS method (Belle) Belle results (357 fb-1) hep-ex/0508048 Suppressed channel not visible yet: UsingrD=0.060±0.003, for maximum mixing (φ3=0, δ=180°): rB<0.18 (90% CL)

  11. ADS method (BaBar) B→ D*0K (D*0 →D0p0) B→ D*0K(D*0→D0g) B→ D0K PRD 72 (2005) 071104 Suppressed channel not visible Bondar & Gershon PRD70,091503(2004) rB<0.23 (90% CL) for BDK rB<0.16 for BD*K

  12. Constraints on rB (BaBar) 48o<g<73o GLW ADS combination For maximum mixing (g/φ3=0, δ=180°): rB<0.23@ 90% C.L. rB= D0 K D0K*+ DK*, GLW+ADS g[0,p]&(dD+dB)[0,2p] 1-CL 1s 2s 3s rB

  13. ADS method (BaBar) B->D[K+p-p0] Khep-ex/0607065 (ICHEP 06)

  14. ADS method (BaBar) B->D[K+p-p0] K hep-ex/0607065 (ICHEP 06) rDK<0.039 (95% CL) rB<0.185 (95% CL)

  15. Summary • The statistics is not enough for measure the φ3/g using ADS and GLW methods • However these approaches can provide constrain for rB and can be used combined with Dalitz analysis method • There are perspectives for improving the result with larger data set

More Related