1 / 17

Test Beam 2003 Some Preliminary Results

Test Beam 2003 Some Preliminary Results. CMS Week Sep-2003. Outlook. Trigger (BTI & TRACO) information from the output of TSS-TSM is checked using tracks obtained from chamber TDC hits. Trigger “quality” for normal incidence TRAC0 resolution (position and angle) for different angles.

halen
Télécharger la présentation

Test Beam 2003 Some Preliminary Results

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Test Beam 2003 Some Preliminary Results CMS Week Sep-2003

  2. Outlook Trigger (BTI & TRACO) information from the output of TSS-TSM is checked using tracks obtained from chamber TDC hits • Trigger “quality” for normal incidence • TRAC0 resolution (position and angle) for different angles ( Trigger Configuration: SET STD-DEF)

  3. TSS-TSM: BTI Trigger quality vs Meantimers Taking out d-rays (by cutting on c2) NO BTI trigger events are concentrated mainly near Ibeams but still ~0.65% out of Ibeams. Meantimers from SL q Trigger on Correct BX Tracks with hits in the 4 layers No trigger for some “good” events HLT correspond to “good” hit times Most of LLT correspond with delta rays Selection of “good” events By cutting on c2

  4. TSS-TSM: BTI Trigger quality vs track fit quality (I) Fitted track “quality” redefined: If track of N-hits has c2 > 2 the ¨worst¨ hit is removed and refitted with N-1 hits. Selection of N´= 4 hit tracks 2 Cases studied depending on the number of hits per cell in track A) At least 1 cell with 2 hits (Multi-hit) B) ONLY 1 hit per cell (Single-hit)

  5. TSS-TSM:BTI Trigger quality vs track fit quality (II) A) Multi-hit B) Single - hit Trigger on Correct BX Trigger on Correct BX Total Trigger efficiency: 99.49 0.03 HLT: 98.99  0.04 LLT: 1.010.03 Total Trigger efficiency: 97.56  0.08 HLT: 94.86 0.12 LLT: 5.14 0.12

  6. Selection of Events on SL PHI2 Selection of “good” events on SL PHI2 based on: Hits on 4 layers Good fitted track (cut on c2) High Trigger Quality “expected”

  7. TSS-TSM: TRACO quality vs Meantimers Triggers on Correct BX HH = 89.2 % HL = 7.5 % Previous events selected on SL phi2 and track with hits in 4 layers on SL phi1 HL triggers correspond mostly with delta rays There is a small fraction of events with “good MT” and no HH trigger

  8. Statistics for “good” events on both SLs Selection of “good” events on SL PHI2 AND SLPHI1 Hits on 4 layers Good fitted track (cut on c2) HH 97% HL 1.7% Ho,Hi 0.9% LL,Lo,Li 0.1% NO TRACO 0.3% No correlations for “no HH” with respect to MT values

  9. No HH events No correlations for missing TRACO events with respect to chamber position.

  10. Dependence of TSS-TSM:TRACO Trigger quality with fit qualities (I) Again fitted track “quality” redefined HH HL No trigger 2 Cases studied depending on the number of hits per cell in track A) At least 1 cell with 2 hits (Multi-hit) B) ONLY 1 hit per cell (Single-hit)

  11. Dependence of TSS-TSM:TRACO Trigger quality with fit qualities (I) A) Multi-hit A) Multi-hit Trigger on Correct BX 4 + 4 B) Single - hit B) Single - hit Trigger on Correct BX 4 + 4

  12. A first look at 2-m Trigger Selection of 2-m events: 2 fitted tracks 4+4 on chamber && TRACO HH, HL, LL Position of the best track different from TRACO position THEN We look for a second muon on TRACO compatible with the chamber track Quality of the second muon 4 + 4 & HH

  13. Reconstruction of tracks TRACO vs Chamber Selection of “golden” tracks on chamber and TRACO: Chamber: Tracks with hits in 4 layers on SL PHI1 with c2 < 0.6 & Tracks with hits in 4 layers on SL PHI2 with c2 < 0.6 TRACO: HH triggers on correct BX

  14. TRACO vs Chamber positions TRACO PHI coordenate correlated with chamber position Trigger Position = 1.06 x Chamber + offset Different offsets for different regions (TRACO’s)

  15. TRACO: Position resolution for different angles Different region of cells on SL PHI2 TRACO resolution in position similar for all angles: ~0.5-0.6 mm

  16. AngleReconstruction Traco–Chamber angle • = 1 mrad • =-4 mrad • =-1 mrad • = 3 mrad • = 7 mrad D= 3 mrad Angle resolution ~0.3-0.4 deg (~ 5-7 mrad)

  17. Summary • Preliminary results show a good trigger performance for TRACO and BTI • There is a clear correlation between chamber performance and trigger response (as expected ! ) • Data indicate trigger “intrinsic inefficiencies” (good chamber track but no trigger) lower than 1%. • TRACO track resolution (for HH) at different angles: ~ 0.5-0.6 mm ~ 5 - 7 mrad are in good agreement with the “theoretical” expectations

More Related