Download
mba in perspective fundamentals in general management n.
Skip this Video
Loading SlideShow in 5 Seconds..
MBA in Perspective Fundamentals in General Management PowerPoint Presentation
Download Presentation
MBA in Perspective Fundamentals in General Management

MBA in Perspective Fundamentals in General Management

229 Vues Download Presentation
Télécharger la présentation

MBA in Perspective Fundamentals in General Management

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript

  1. MBA in PerspectiveFundamentals in General Management Prof. dr. Pieter Klaas Jagersma BSN - Buren - May 20 2008

  2. Points to cover • Speaker and approach • History of general management • Basics of general management • Scanning the environment • Policy formulation • Policy implementation • Policy evaluation and control • Last but not least

  3. 0 Speaker and Approach

  4. Speaker Science Author ‘Heart’share Entrepreneur Non-executive Private life

  5. About today’s lecture ... • Put MBA in perspective - holistic approach • Cliffhangers (frameworks/visualizations) • From Paper > Practice • ‘On the cutting edge’ - tailor made for BSN • Present some generalized lessons learned • ‘The key to success is not trying to please everyone’/Cosby ‘95 (monologue/dialogue) • Have fun!

  6. Today’s core message • Transparancy is the magic word!

  7. 1History of General Management (GM)

  8. Contents • General management: what’s in a name? • General management and faculty • Journals and professional societies • Development of general management theory and research

  9. a General Management: What’s in a Name?

  10. Quite clear ..... • General Management is about the direction of organizations • ‘Heart’ of wealth creation in modern society!

  11. General Management = • General management is an approach in which leading managers (‘general’ managers) decide what to do with regard to which value chain activities in a holistic manner and oriented towards specific organization-wide goals [MBA]

  12. Surprise ... • Practice >> very old • but ..... • Theory >> ‘child of sixties’

  13. Background • First Industrial Revolution (1750-1850): • no ‘strategic’ behavior >> businesses small, little capital employed, room for everyone,‘invisible hand of the market’ • Second Industrial Revolution (1850-1920): • construction of key railroads >> mass market buil- ding possible >> ec. of scale/scope >> rivalry • ‘visible hand of general managers’: large verti-cal integrated firms + management hierarchies to deal with (environmental) complexity

  14. Background (Cont.) • Alfred Sloan (CEO GM: 1923-1946): • articulated need for ‘general’ management think-ing: business policy = f (strengths + weaknesses of Ford) • developed multidivisional ‘control’ structure • WW II vs ‘general’ management: • how to allocate scarce resources across an organi- zation? (quantitative analysis/’OR’-’besliskunde’) • through formal planning organizations can exert control over market forces and future

  15. b General Management and Faculty

  16. Roots of General Management as an academic discipline • First ‘Business Policy’ (GM) course at Harvard University (1912) • GM/Business Policy course: built out of functio-nal courses like accounting, operations, finance (‘integration’) • Case method (Harvard style) • Model for other Business Schools • First course or final course

  17. General Management faculty • Professors (experienced teachers with broad view of business) + assistent/associate professors (for-mer ‘senior’ - general - managers) • Eclecticism + holistic perspective: how to match a firm’s choices with its (competitive) environ-ment (famous ‘fit’ question) • General Management/Business Policy as a ‘cap-stone course’

  18. Consequence of ‘capstone course’ • Single ‘capstone course’ permits no development! • Faculty makes intellectual homes elsewhere • Course development work: cases (not articles and books) • ‘Rich’ general descriptions of practice (thanks to case writing and consulting) • In 1963 influential ‘general management’ confe-rence at Harvard Business School (HBS) • Since early 1970s accumulation of cases and re- search (externally)

  19. c Professional Societies and Journals

  20. Professional societies • The Planning Forum (USA)/Business Poli-cy Society (UK) (since 1950s/1960s) • Strategic Management Society (since 80s) >> Sponsored AMJ, AMR, AME, SMJ • Vereniging voor Strategische Beleidsvor- ming (VSB) (since 1980s) • NCD (since 1970s)

  21. General Management Journals - categories • Specific Business Journals • LRP, The Planning Review (70s); JoM (60s); SMJ (80s) and JBS (also since 80s) • General Management Journals • HBR, SMR, CMR, JofB, Business Horizons, JoGM, HMR, M@n@gement (www.managementsite.net) • Academic Journals • ASQ, AMJ, AMR, Management Science, MAB, M&O, ESB

  22. d Development of General Management Theory and Research

  23. Birth of the General Management Field: One fundamental work/book “Business Policy: Text and Cases” (Harvard Textbook Andrews / Learned et al, 1965)

  24. Business Policy: Text and Cases (1965) • Organization-concept of Chandler + ‘Dis-tinctive Competence’ (Selznick, ‘57) + ‘un-certain environment’ (which means instantadaptation of organizations) • Environment (thanks to changes): ‘opportu- nities and threats’ and firm’s ‘strengths + weaknesses’ were adapted to avoid threats and take advantage of opportunities [SWOT]

  25. Business Policy: Text and Cases (1965) (Cont.) • Internal appraisal of strengths and weaknes- ses >> ‘distinctive competencies’ and exter- nal appraisal of threats and opportunities > ‘potential success factors’ (CSFs/KSFs) • Internal + external appraisal = foundations of ‘business policy formulation’ • ‘Business policy formulation’ is ‘analytical’ and ‘business policy implementation’ is ‘ad-ministrative’ (denken versus doen)

  26. Their audience ... • Professors and students

  27. Who influenced General Management practice? • 1 • General Electric (GE): in 1960s ‘godfather’ of business planning and executive education programs with help from ‘academic friends’ and private consulting firms (McKinsey&Company)

  28. Who influenced General Management practice? (Cont.) • 2 • The Boston Consulting Group - BCG (Henderson - mid-1960s) Why? - Applying quantitative research to business problems - Selling powerful oversimplifications - What are basic rules for success? - The most relevant frame of reference is the ‘concept’

  29. How? • Concepts • a. Experience curve • Experience in production > market share > lower costs > higher margins and cash flow > highest profits > dynamic aspect called for ‘competitive behavior’ (needing: ‘integrated’ management = ‘general management’)

  30. How? (Cont.) • b. Growth-share matrix • Cash cows/dogs/stars/question marks (‘era of port- folio analyses’)

  31. ‘Growth-share matrix’ Marketshare high low Star ? high low Industry growth Cash cow Dog

  32. Industry attractiveness - Competitive position matrix Industry attractiveness (lots of criteria) high medium low Invest/ Selective Selectivity growth growth high medium low Selective Selectivity Divest/ growth harvest Business strength Selectivity Divest/ Divest/ harvest harvest

  33. How? (Cont.) • Spin-offs: Bain&Company etc etc • ‘Thanks to’ BCG, the entrepreneurial res- ponsibility of management was recognized to consider the long-run, dynamic direction of the firm, even while maintaining routi- ne and efficient operations (mindset of de- cision makers: from efficiency to effective- ness)

  34. General Management research in the 1960s/1970s • Experiental, case-based evidence in 1960s: descriptive studies • Systematic observation, deductive analysis and modeling (1970s): normative studies

  35. General Management research in the 1980s: dichotomy • Descriptive studies of how policies are for-med/implemented (‘management process’) • G. Steiner (long-range planning), H. Mintzberg (‘emergent decision making’), J.B. Quinn (‘logical incrementalism’) • Studies seeking to understand the relation- ship between organization choices and per-formance (‘management content’ school) • HBS (growth and diversification), Purdue (heterogeneity and perfor-mance within a single industry), Harvard University (IO/market po-wer and entry/exit barriers) et cetera et cetera

  36. General Management research in the 1990s/2000s • General Management inspired by ‘globalization’: • - third dimension of management (P/F) product functions geography

  37. 2Basics of General Management (GM)

  38. Organization performance (‘firms’) attractive- positioning potential potential maximum ness of of firm internal external profitability industry synergy synergy 55% 20% 10% 15% 100% Source: Caves (1977); Porter (1980); Goldman Sachs (1996); Jagersma (2000)

  39. Definition of ‘general management’ • General management = • 1. environmental scanning + • 2. (business) policy formulation + • 3. (business) policy implementation + • 4. (business) policy evaluation/control

  40. General Management is ... • Future thinking/‘Controlling’ the future Design of a desired future • (Integrated) Decision making Fundamental choices; Integration of hierarchically determined actions • ‘Formalized procedure to produce an articu- lated result, in the form of an integrated sys- tem of decisions/actions’ (Mintzberg, 1990) Emphasis on formalization: decomposition, distinction, and rationali- zation of processes/decisions/actions ‘Business plans’

  41. Why business plans? • They provide a discipline forcing managers to take a careful look ahead periodically (mngt of ‘future’) • They require rigorous communications about mis-sion, vision, strategies, objectives, goals, and resour-ce allocations: clarity • Basis for evaluating + integrating short-term (func-tional) plans • They help implement changes once decided on • They make the management group coherent

  42. Bad General Management - numbers oriented • ‘Playing tennis by watching the scoreboard instead of the ball’ • - The Economist (1988)

  43. General Management (process): 6 basics • GM is a process - basic ingredients design great general management • Congruence/‘fit’ between ingredients is decisive • Responsible for ‘pie’ is the ‘general’ manager, CEO and/or Managing Board (RvB/Directie) • The result of the GM process - a couple of steps - is explicit and prioritized • Simplicity always wins! • Formulation + implementation ‘join hands’

  44. Explicit; prioritization; consistency; communicate; responsibility Basics of GM process ‘FIT’ Scanning the Policy Policy Policy environment formation roll-out evaluation External Mission Action pro- BBS/EFQM - Societal Vision grams (performance) - Industry Objectives (margin) Goals Internal Strategies - Structure (C, B, C, F) - Culture - Resources INGREDIENTS

  45. Basic requirements for successful General Management 4Fs Focus Fit Fitness Flexibility ..... on ..... be- ..... of front- ..... of total customer tween will and back- organization needs and skill office

  46. 3Scanning the environment

  47. Explicit; prioritization; consistency; communicate; responsibility Basics of GM process ‘FIT’ Scanning the Policy Policy Policy environment formation roll-out evaluation External Mission Action pro- BBS/EFQM - Societal Vision grams (performance) - Industry Objectives (margin) Goals Internal Strategies - Structure (C, B, C, F) - Culture - Resources INGREDIENTS

  48. External environment: what’s in a name? • Opportunities and threats (OTs) outside the organization • Organizational context: determines success or failure of organization • Variables (often) not within short-run con-trol of general management

  49. External environment: two parts • Societal environment: forces that influen-ce the long-term decisions of an organiza-tion • Business (industry) environment: forces or groups that directly affect an organiza-tion (stakeholders, 5-forces of Porter, uni-ons, et cetera) Scenario Building

  50. Explicit; prioritization; consistency; communicate; responsibility Basics of GM process ‘FIT’ Scanning the Policy Policy Policy environment formation roll-out evaluation External Mission Action pro- BBS/EFQM - Societal Vision grams (performance) - Industry Objectives (margin) Goals Internal Strategies - Structure (C, B, C, F) - Culture - Resources INGREDIENTS