360 likes | 586 Vues
E N D
1. Solids Separation and Concentration of Shipboard Wastewaters and Residuals by a High Shear Rotary Membrane System (HSR-MS) Project Number WP-1671
Tracy M. Carole
Naval Surface Warfare Center, Carderock Division
In-Progress Review Meeting
17 February 2010
2. 2 Project Team Tracy Carole (PI) and Tracy Harasti
DOD Laboratory at Naval Surface Warfare Center, Carderock Division
Dr. Brian Reed (Co-PI)
University of Maryland, Baltimore County, Civil & Environmental Engineering
Dr. Douglas Frey and Dr. Tony Farquhar
University of Maryland Baltimore County
Chemical & Biochemical Engineering (Frey)
Mechanical Engineering (Farquhar)
John Bendick, P.E.
UMBC PhD student
William Greene
SpinTek Filtration
3. 3 Technical Objective Objective: Develop a robust shipboard treatment system to treat a variety of Navy solids-bearing wastewaters and residuals.
Specific goals:
Increase HSR-MS permeate flux/decrease system size by employing back pulsing and continuous membrane cleaning.
Increase the active membrane packing density (active membrane area/system footprint/space) by using larger diameter disks operated at a lower rotation
Conceptually design, fabricate and test a shipboard HSR-MS that incorporates back pulsing, continuous membrane cleaning, larger disks, and disk overlap.
Outcome: A shipboard HSR-MS having increased waste treatment throughput, a smaller footprint/space requirements, be potentially portable, and constructed of lighter weight and cheaper materials.
4. 4 Size of membrane disk is limited by ?
Excessive backpressure at outer edge
Difficulty in rotating large disk at high ?
Need to reduce ? to increase disk size
Reducing ? decreases surface scouring action which reduces J (gal/ft2-d)
Loss of cleaning action from disk rotation replaced by continual cleaning/backpulsing
Need baseline data to assess increase in efficiency during continuous cleaning/backpulsing
5. 5 Technical Approach Items in red are covered for this meetingItems in red are covered for this meeting
6. 6 Task 1. Develop Synthetic Wastes The project team worked with Carderock waste experts to identify the wastes that could be treated by HSR-MS.
Current and future shipboard wastes were considered.
7. 7 Membranes were identified using the following criteria:
Must be commercially available
Be attachable to HSRM disk
Pore size between 0.1 and 5 um
Durable
Membranes underwent stirred cell testing
Waste placed in kegs and stirred cells
Paddle rotated and pressure applied
Permeate mass measured every minute
Turbidity of composite sample measured
Membranes cleaned and procedure repeated
Cleaning methods were developed Emphasis cleaning methodsEmphasis cleaning methods
8. 8 Task 3. Baseline Testing SpinTek constructed 2 pilot-scale HSR units Here we had to give some credit to SpinTek but we hated doing it.
Shipped one unit to Carderock for baseline testing
Carderock facility space renovated with electric, water, heat, etc.
2nd unit remained at SpinTek to work on backpulsing mechanism
Low rotation (500 rpm) used; pressures varied between 35 and 55 psi
Permeate flux and quality measured for at least 3 runs
Membrane cleaned in between treatment runs using methods developed in stirred cell testing Decided to keep 2n unit there once some results from baseline testing were ID as positive, save time and $ shipping unit back to spintek for backpulsing upgradeDecided to keep 2n unit there once some results from baseline testing were ID as positive, save time and $ shipping unit back to spintek for backpulsing upgrade
9. 9 Task 1 ResultsWaste Selection/ Development
10. 10 Task 2. Selected Membranes All membranes commercially available, durable and can be attached to membrane disk
Pore sizes in target range (0.1 to 5 um) polytetrafluorothylene polytetrafluorothylene
11. 11 Task 2 ResultsRaw Stirred Cell Data
12. 12 Task 2 ResultsReduced Stirred Cell Data
13. 13 Task 2 ResultsAveraged Stirred Cell Data For all wastes membranes gave similar J although not the same membranes, Permeate quality similar for all membranes, carry all membranes into pilotscale testingFor all wastes membranes gave similar J although not the same membranes, Permeate quality similar for all membranes, carry all membranes into pilotscale testing
14. 14 Task 2 ResultsSummary of Stirred Cell Tests All membranes performed well based on permeate flux/quality
Carry forward all membranes-waste combinations to baseline pilot-scale testing
Cleaning methods established
Bilge; Black/gray; Biosolids 2 step process
BIZ, Dawn, pH =11.5; citric acid, pH 2.5
Cl2 (1%) only effective for PTFE
PAWDS: warm water flush
Virgin membrane resistances determined for all membranes and can be used as tracking of membrane fouling Point #1 peroformance did not decrease with run #Point #1 peroformance did not decrease with run #
15. 15 Status of Task 3Baseline Testing Permeate quality and quantity similar for all membranes, carry all membranes into pilotscale testingPermeate quality and quantity similar for all membranes, carry all membranes into pilotscale testing
16. 16 Task 3Example Pilot-Scale Results Point out Point out
17. 17 Task 3Example PAWDS Results J did not decline initially
J higher than other wastes due to type of solids:
PAWDS inert particles (avg size = 22 um)
Other waste either biologically active or deformable particles
Higher fluxes possible if rotation increased and continuous cleaning/ backpulsing used
Possible that HSR system can be used as is for PAWDS waste
Repeat tests at higher rotations Other wastes, solids promote membrane foulingOther wastes, solids promote membrane fouling
18. 18 Modification of Unit #2 for Backpulsing Treatment: valves 1 and 3 open, 2 closed
Permeate flows into 4 L chamber
Backpulsing: valve 1 closes, valve 2 opens and pressure forces permeate stored in chamber to flow back into membrane chamber
Significantly reduce buildup of solids on membrane surface
19. 19 Effect of BackpulsingConceptual J-time
20. 20 Go/No-Go End of Task 3 GO Decision: if baseline testing demonstrates sufficient permeate water quality and permeate flux performance to warrant further investigation into continual physical cleaning and backpulsing
Fluxes observed at the beginning of runs were relatively high despite the low rotation used
The decline in flux was due to buildup of solute boundary layer at the membrane surface
Backpulsing/continuous cleaning will minimize solids buildup producing an increase in flux at low rotational speeds
Lower rotational speed will allow larger disks to be used
We believe that a GO decision for further work is warranted
21. 21 Issues and Resolution Space at Carderock needed to be renovated ? Resolved
Difficulty in securing black-gray WW and biosolids from ongoing Carderock research
? used LPRWRP as source for these wastes
2nd Unit remained at SpinTek for backpulsing development
? 2nd unit shipped this month
General contract delays
Issues with locating students/post doc at Carderock (citizenship and distance)
? Intern from Univ. of Pitt./Reed working at Carderock, full-time person will be hired to work at Carderock to accelerate testing
Membrane attachment method needed to be refined ? Resolved
22. 22 Transition Plan Interim Results
Poster at SERDP December 09 conference
John Bendick Ph.D pre-proposal
Use of HSR-MS for PAWDS waste treatment will be discussed with navy personnel
Research Transition
Continue with work to quantify increase in efficiency realized by continual cleaning/backpulsing
Begin conceptualized design of overlapping disks
23. BACKUP MATERIAL These charts are required, but will only be briefed if questions arise.
24. 24 Bilge Water Stirred Cell Results
25. 25 Black/Gray Wastewater Stirred Cell Results
26. 26 PAWDS Stirred Cell Results
27. 27 Biosolids Stirred Cell Results
28. 28 Bilge Water Pilot-Scale Results
29. 29 Black/Gray Wastewater Pilot-Scale Results
30. 30 PAWDS Pilot-Scale Results
31. 31 Effect of Backpulsing
32. 32 Effect of Continuous Cleaning
33. 33 Membrane Pressures in HSR-MS
34. 34 Collection of PAWDS Waste
35. 35 Acronyms and Symbols ? = disk rotational speed, rpm
J = membrane flux, permeate volume/membrane area per time. (gal/ft2-d)
LPRWRP = Little Patuxent River Water Reclamation Plant
TSS = total suspended solids
PAWDS = plasma arc waste destruction system
AP = applied pressure, psi
36. 36 Publications Provide a list of all publications, oral presentations, patents, awards, etc. that already have resulted from this work.
Poster at SERDP December 09 conference
Provide a list of publications that are in progress or planned (including venue for publication) and oral presentations that are scheduled.
Use of Backpulsing and Continuous Cleaning to Improve Performance of High Shear Rotary Membrane System Journal of Environmental Engineering, ASCE