1 / 13

Evaluation of Virtual Desktop Infrastructure Solutions for Campus-Wide Implementation

This project aims to research and evaluate various Hosted Virtual Desktop (HVD) environments and provide a scalable implementation plan along with necessary resource recommendations. The scope includes analyzing HVD solutions suitable for lab/classroom environments and faculty/staff workstations across the campus. Key vendors reviewed include Citrix, Dell, Microsoft, Nutanix, and Unidesk, along with contributions from several universities. The focus is on performance across different endpoints, with an emphasis on cost-effectiveness and minimal management overhead.

hamlet
Télécharger la présentation

Evaluation of Virtual Desktop Infrastructure Solutions for Campus-Wide Implementation

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. An ISU Evaluation of Virtual Desktop Infrastructure

  2. Project Team Members Dudley Roach Majeed Abu-Qulbain Alexander Fishel Bryan Gill Ryan Grahs Patrick Healy Krena Hoyt Pete Juvinall Ballard McCleskey Kevin McMahon Dave Rathke Chad Scheiman Paul Unsbee

  3. Project Summary • Goal • The goal of this project is to research and evaluate the various HVD environments and make a recommendation on a scalable implementation plan and the resources it would require. • Scope • This project was asked to look at campus wide HVD solutions for both lab/classroom environments and faculty/staff workstations.

  4. Research phase • Vendors • Citrix • Dell • Microsoft • Nutanix • Unidesk • Universities • University of Connecticut • Heartland Community College • Indiana University • Clemson • Michigan State

  5. What’s it going to run on?(endpoint testing)

  6. Zero Thick Thin • Connection broker independent • Increased Graphics • Long recap cycle • Connection broker dependent • Inexpensive • Minimal management • Existing machines • Minimal updating

  7. Questions?

More Related