40 likes | 161 Vues
This document outlines a structured approach to refining prioritized problem statements and generating relevant outcomes. It includes the development of a "wish list" for outcomes tied to each problem statement, followed by a series of guiding questions to ensure these outcomes are direct, comprehensive, and impactful. The review process narrows down outcomes to realistic and measurable options, considering potential proxy measures for those that are challenging to quantify. Lastly, the outcome measures are evaluated with committees to categorize them as goal or objective-level measures, leading to a prioritized action plan.
E N D
Outcomes 1. Reviewed/refined the prioritized problem statements 2. Generated a “wish list” of outcomes for each of the prioritized problem statements 3. Asked a series of guiding questions • Are these really outcomes? • Do they address the problem directly? • Do they address the problem fully? • What type of difference will the outcomes make in the problem?
Outcomes 4. Reviewed/narrowed the outcomes • Which outcomes seemed most realistic/possible/measurable? • Which outcomes were clearly not measurable (e.g. social norm change) • What types of “proxy” measures could we utilize to measure some of the “not measurable” outcomes • What does the research say? What are the realistic measures?
Outcomes 5. Reviewed the outcome measures with the committees/staff • Which seemed to be more “goal” level measures and “objective” level measures • Which appeared to be Standards and Practices? • Began dividing out the measures 6. Prioritized the outcome measures