BOG: Annexes

1. BOG: Annexes • Annex I, Definitions • Changes for PM10 and PM2.5, OK • Clarification needed somewhere for stack measurements, condensable particles etc. • CAS numbers missing for some POPs • LPS definition was moved into the main text (paragraph 20). • Sulphur, suggest to revise in Note: “recommendations on reporting all sulphur compounds”.

2. Table IV C Notation keys • Correction of language • Check harmonisation with new IPCC GL. • NA is pre-filled • Tiny trace emissions? NE or NA? More guidance? • Add background information of how NK are expected to be used from review point of view etc.

3. Naming of tables • Rename tables in a sensible way

4. Table IV 1, general • For data transfer – no aggregations • Sector aggregations wanted, automatically in a separate sheet? • Add headings from old aggregated lines for clarification (in column before reporting code) • Unspecified – transparency • how to best present data if details are not available • if a key source, it needs to be detailed • unspecified confusing and not the way forward, use notation keys correctly and fully explained • “Other” is still needed for some sectors

5. Table IV 1, general • Have to check in the end to see that NFR is balanced for the different pollutants • Transportation? Fugitive emissions from transportation of products

6. Table IV 1, extensions+moving • Extensions to splits between stationary and mobile (e.g. 1A2, 1A4), OK, but where? Harmonisation with CRF • Suggested to report non-road mobile in appropriate extensions in 1A3 ii or 1A5b (compare and review definitions with IPCC, proposals to be presented)

7. Table IV 1, moving • 1A3b, Road abrasion and tyre and brake wear (non-combustion), move to product use, Sector 3 (3E)? • Proposed to keep it in 1A3b

8. Table IV 1, extensions • 1B2a vi Geothermal energy extraction, formerly reported i NFR 7, could be 1B3 • All codes under 2, to have extensions for storage and handling, and for “other” • 2A7 i and ii particle emissions quarrying+ mining, construction, OK

9. Table IV 1, extensions • Several extensions in 2C5, note: different level of detail in combustion and energy • 2D i Wood processing: 2D3 • 2D ii other prod incl handling: 2D4 • 2E and 2F to be clarified • 2E Production of POPs (and HMs) • POPs to chemical industry? (ask TNO) • HM removed • 2F Consumption of POPs and HMs (contained in products). Relation to 3D? (ask TNO)

10. Table IV 1, extensions • 3A split in 3A i, ii and u: 3A1, 3A2, 3A3 • 3B i, ii, u split: 3B1, 3B2. Remove 3B u (to check further if it is needed). • 3C and 3D to be decided later • 3C i, ii, iii, u: leave as aggregated 3C • 3D i, ii, u: 3D1 printing, 3D2 domestic solvent use, 3D3 “other”. Review and come up with sensible split

11. Table IV 1, extensions • Agriculture, 4B manure management (incl housing, storage, grazing, (animal waste)): • split in straw based and slurry based systems removed • 4D, Direct soil emissions • 4D1, split fertilizers (synthetic-(animal waste)-“other”) 4D1a, 4D1c • 4D2, storage, handling and (transport?) of agricultural products (farm-level, off farm) PM emissions • 4D1b (animal waste) and 4D2c (“grazing”) to be removed (included in 4B) • Will be inconsistent with CRF • There are inconsistencies in present reporting! 4B/4D. Option still remains to report either.

12. Table IV 1, extensions • 4B5 Camel and Llamas removed • 4B9 i, ii etc split for different poultry to 4B a, b, etc, OK • Remove 4C, rice cultivation

13. Table IV 1, extensions • Check consistency of 5B label with CRF • 6C Waste incineration split: OK (6C1, 6C2 etc)

14. Table IV 1, pollutant change • TSP removed,OK

15. Table III C, Fuels • Presumed copied from IPCC, check new definitions in IPCC GL, add definitions • Fuel definitions i guidelines (peat), check consistency with UNFCCC • Indicated footnotes missing • Industrial waste includes 116 which is wood waste, to be included in biomass? Depends on definitions

16. Table IV 1, activity data • Activity data • Allows for calculation of IEF • in REPDAB • Activity data primarily for review. • Additional burden of reporting • For energy, data from UNFCCC? Is it OK to refer to/copy UNFCCC reporting? • In transport, differences, more detailed to CLRTAP • Other sectors, differences, need reporting. • Structure sensible, add column to split activity description and unit for non-energy sources • Several sources with different activity data in same NFR category, might need space for different activity data for different substances

17. Table III B, Aggregations for gridding, GNFR-codes • For modeling purposes: split point, line, area sources. Split temporal resolution • A lot of grids to produce! Need to think about it... Not much country input

18. Annex IV Table 3b, LPS • Two columns for ID of LPS, name of LPS EPER-ID. • Amendments to descriptions • Shading of additional reporting removed, note removed • Can be several GNFRs for one LPS. Use main activity. • Change order of pollutants to be consistent with other tables. • Clarify paragraph 18-20, definition of LPS • Report all pollutants if level is exceeded

19. Annex IV Table 3a, Template for gridded data • Order of pollutants consistent with other tables • Shading of additional reporting removed, note removed

20. Annex IV Table 2a (2b), Projections • Reference to definition of “With Measures” (additional measures dropped) • More explanatory guidance in the table • Need box to specify latest historic year used for projections • Projected years to be harmonised with GL • Detailed level of reporting questioned, NEC requirements?

21. Annex IV Table 2b, Activity data for projections • Value and need of table within LRTAP questioned. • Propose to drop it.