Michael Rohmer (Former) Graduate Research Assistant

1. TRC-B&C-03-16 May 2016 Year IV TRC Project 40012400056 Measurement of Static Load Performance in a Water Lubricated Hybrid Thrust Bearing Luis San Andrés Mast-Childs Chair Professor Michael Rohmer (Former) Graduate Research Assistant Scott Wilkinson Graduate Research Assistant Hardik Jani Graduate Research Assistant

2. Justification • Compressors, turbochargers, turbo expanders, blowers, etc., rely on thrust bearings as they are the primary means of axial load support and rotor position. • Axial loads in turbomachinery are speed and pressure dependent, their prediction is largely empirical. • Thrust bearing design relies on validated models,experimental results will benchmark predictive tools for thrust bearings.

3. Cross Section of Thrust Bearing Test Rig 0 2 in 4 in Air Buffer Seals Thrust Load Mechanism Dynamic Load Mechanism Aerostatic Bearings Rotor Assembly Radial Hydrostatic Bearings Slave Thrust Bearing Test Thrust Bearing

4. Exploded View of Thrust Bearing Test Rig

5. Schematic Thrust Bearing Test Rig (8.5 lb) Axial Force Test Thrust Bearing

6. Summary of Work • Measurement of static load performance of a thrust bearing for operation with water at various bearing supply pressure and low shaft rotational speed. • Axial Clearance vs. Load • Flow Rate vs. Clearance • Recess Pressure Ratio vs. Clearance • Comparison to Predictions • Derived Axial Stiffness

7. Closed Loop Water Supply System • Max Thrust Bearing Operating Conditions: • Supply Pressure: 150 psi • Flow Rate: 25 GPM Completed: January 2016 (Total time to complete: 3 months)

8. Closed Loop Water Supply System System utilizes deionized water to prevent corrosion • Max Thrust Bearing Operating Conditions: • Supply Pressure: 150 psi • Flow Rate: 25 GPM

9. Water Lubricated Hybrid Thrust Bearings = Axial Clearance = Tilt about x-axis = Tilt about y-axis Bearing area = 32.6 cm²

10. Measurements Static Loader Load Shaft Load Cell Impact Gun

11. Thrust Bearing Performance at Low Rotor Speed Test Thrust Bearing 3 krpm (surface speed = 12 m/s) Findings: Axial clearance increases as water supply pressure increases. Clearance decreases as applied load increases. Slave thrust bearing operates with a larger clearance than test thrust bearing because of its larger orifice diameter. Slave Thrust Bearing Note: Large variation in clearance across face of thrust bearing. Variation in clearance across face increases as axial clearance increases.

12. Test Thrust Bearing Flow Rate at Low Rotor Speed Qs Findings: Supply flow rate and flow rate through inner diameter increase as axial clearance or supply pressure increases. Recess pressure decreases as axial clearance increases. = Recess Pressure Ratio QID Outflow through bearing ID

13. Thrust Bearing Ratio of Flows at Low Rotor Speed Test Thrust Bearing = Supply Flow Rate = Flow Rate through Inner Diameter = Ratio of Flow through Inner Diameter to Supply Flow Findings: Ratio of flow through inner diameter to supply flow is fairly constant (~40%), decreasing slightly as axial load increases (clearance decreases). Test Thrust Bearing

14. Test TB Reynolds Numbers at Low Rotor Speed = Reynolds Number of Radial Flow through Outer Diameter = Reynolds Number of Radial Flow through Inner Diameter Findings: and increase as the supply pressure increases due to the increase in flow rate.

15. Thrust Bearing Performance at Low Rotor Speed Test Thrust Bearing Cd = Orifice Discharge Coefficient QO = Flow Rate through Orifice AO = Area of Orifice Findings: reaches ~0.62 at large clearance.

16. Thrust Bearing Predictions vs. test data 3 krpm 3 krpm Test Thrust Bearing, 3 krpm Slave Thrust Bearing, 3 krpm Findings: The predicted axial clearance is larger than the estimated axial clearance, especially when operating with a high axial load (low axial clearance).

17. Test Thrust Bearing Predictions vs. Measurements Flow thru ID Flow supply Recess pressure ratio Findings: Measurements of recess pressure and flow rate correspond well to predictions at a low axial load (high axial clearance). However, measurements do not correlate well at a high axial load.

18. Thrust Bearing Performance at Low Rotor Speed Load vs Clearance Findings: Measured axial load and estimated axial stiffness decay exponentially. Estimated axial stiffness Findings: Exp. axial stiffness is of same magnitude as predicted axial stiffness but happens at a lower clearance than the predicted axial stiffness.

19. Conclusions • Thrust Bearing: • Axial clearance and flow rate increase as the water supply pressure increases or the axial load decreases. • Predictions accurate on the influence of applied load and supply pressure on the thrust bearing performance. • Discrepancies exist between the magnitudes of the measurements and predictions when operating with a high axial load (low axial clearance) because of the large thrust collar misalignment. • A higher water supply pressure into the bearings could mitigate the misalignment of the thrust collar.

20. 2016 proposal to TRC Main objectives are to automate the procedure for identification of dynamic force coefficients and to measure the performance of a water lubricated hydrodynamicTB. • The tasks to be performed are: • Design and fabrication of a new hydrodynamic thrust bearing (eight pads). • Troubleshooting of load mechanism for sound identification of axial force coefficients. • Measurement of axial clearance vs. static thrust load (max. W=670 N [2.0 bar specific load]) for rotor speed to a max. 9 krpm. The water will be supplied at just above ambient pressure. • Measurement of TB axial response from impacts and identification of axial stiffness, damping and inertia force coefficients. The proposed work will benchmark a predictive tool for hydrodynamic thrust bearings. Tilting pad thrust bearings have the potential to reduce the influence of misalignment.

21. TRC Budget 2016-2017 The products of the research are important for compressors- barrel and integrally geared, turbochargers and turbo expanders, blowers, etc.

22. References [1] Rohmer, M. and San Andrés, L., 2014, “Revamping a Thrust Bearing Test Rig,” Annual Progress Report to the Turbomachinery Research Consortium, TRC-B&C-03-2014, Turbomachinery Laboratory, Texas A&M University, May. [2] XLTRC2, 2002, Computational Rotordynamics Software Suite, Turbomachinery Laboratory, Texas A&M University. [3] San Andrés, L., 2002, “Effects of Misalignment on Turbulent Flow Hybrid Thrust Bearings,” ASME J. of Trib., 124(1), pp. 212-219. [4] San Andrés, L., Rohmer, M., and Wilkinson, S., 2015, “Revamping and Preliminary Operation of a Thrust Bearing Test Rig,” Annual Progress Report to the Turbomachinery Research Consortium, TRC-B&C-02-2015, Turbomachinery Laboratory, Texas A&M University, May. [5] San Andrés, L., 2013, “A Test Rig for Evaluation of Thrust Bearings and Face Seals,” Proposal to the Turbomachinery Research Consortium, Turbomachinery Laboratory, Texas A&M University, May. [6] Forsberg, M., 2008, “Comparison Between Predictions and Experimental Measurements for an Eight Pocket Annular HTB,” M.S. Thesis, Mechanical Engineering, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX. [7] Esser, P., 2010, “Measurements versus Predictions for a Hybrid (Hydrostatic plus Hydrodynamic) Thrust Bearing for a Range of Orifice Diameters,” M.S. Thesis, Mechanical Engineering, College Station, TX. [8] San Andrés, L., 2010, Modern Lubrication Theory, “Hydrostatic Journal Bearings,” Notes 12b, Texas A&M University Digital Libraries, http://repository.tamu.edu/handle/1969.1/93197. [9] Rowe, W., 1983, Hydrostatic and Hybrid Bearing Design, Textbook, Butterworths, pp. 1-20, 46-68. [10] Sternlicht, B. and Elwell, R.C., 1960, “Theoretical and Experimental Analysis of Hydrostatic Thrust Bearings,” ASME J. Basic Eng., 82(3), pp. 505-512. [11] Fourka, M. and Bonis, M., 1997, “Comparison between Externally Pressurized Gas Thrust Bearings with Different Orifice and Porous Feeding Systems,” Wear, 210(1-2), pp. 311-317. [12] Belforte, G., Colombo, F., Raparelli, T., Trivella, A., and Viktorov, V., 2010, “Performance of Externally Pressurized Grooved Thrust Bearings,” Tribol. Lett., 37, pp. 553-562. [13] San Andrés, L., 2000, “Bulk-Flow Analysis of Hybrid Thrust Bearings for Process Fluid Applications,” ASME J. of Trib., 122(1), pp. 170-180. [14] San Andrés, L., Phillips, S., and Childs, D., 2008, “Static Load Performance of a Hybrid Thrust Bearing: Measurement and Validation of Predictive Tool,” 6th Modeling and Simulation Subcommittee / 4th Liquid Propulsion Subcommittee / 3rd Spacecraft Propulsion Subcommittee Joint Meeting. December 8-12, Orlando, Florida, JANNAF-120 Paper. [15] Ramirez, F., 2008, “Comparison between Predictions and Measurements of Performance Characteristics for an Eight Pocket Hybrid (Combination Hydrostatic/Hydrodynamic) Thrust Bearing,” M.S. Thesis, Mechanical Engineering, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX. [16] San Andrés, L. and Childs, D., 1997, “Angled Injection – Hydrostatic Bearings, Analysis and Comparison to Test Results,” ASME J. Tribol., 119, pp. 179-187. [17] San Andrés, L. and Rohmer, M., 2014, “Measurements and XLTRC2 Predictions of Mass Moments of Inertia, Free-Free Natural Frequencies and Mode Shapes of Rotor and Flexible Coupling,” Internal Progress Report, Turbomachinery Laboratory, Texas A&M University, March. [18] Coleman, H. and Steel, W., 1989, “Experimentation and Uncertainty Analysis for Engineers,” John Wiley and Sons, Inc., pp. 1-71.

23. Questions (?) http://rotorlab.tamu.edu Learn more at Acknowledgments Thanks to Turbomachinery Research Consortium and TAMU Turbomachinery Laboratoryfor the support and opportunity.

24. Other material

25. Thrust Bearing Performance at Low Rotor Speed c0 W/A dy dx Findings: The clearance at the center of the thrust bearing and the axial load are constant. However, the tilt about each axis varies periodically (phase lag by 90°).

26. Thrust Bearing Performance at Low Rotor Speed c0 W/A dy dx Findings: The thrust collar tilts about each axis with 1X frequency of 50 Hz (3,000 rpm).

27. Thrust Bearings Tilt Angles at Low Rotor Speed dy dx Test Thrust Bearing, Tilt about x-axis Test Thrust Bearing, Tilt about y-axis Findings: Large variation in clearance across face of thrust bearing. Variation in clearance across face increases as axial clearance increases. dy dx Slave Thrust Bearing, Tilt about x-axis Slave Thrust Bearing, Tilt about y-axis

28. Structural Force Coefficient Derivation 1-DOF Model of Test TB for Parameter Identification Stiffness: Where, Damping: EOM: Frequency Domain

29. Preliminary Dynamic Test Results Typical Axial Impact Force and FFT Amplitude Findings: Impact load measurement behaves as expected. Length of impact as well as the peak amplitude of force are adjustable.

30. Preliminary Dynamic Test Results Typical thrust bearing axial displacement with respect to rotor thrust collar versus time and FFT amplitude. Unusual behavior at low frequencies (less than 200 Hz): Troubleshooting of the load mechanism is underway in order to better excite the system Motion due to an impact force along the axial direction.

31. USET Thrust Bearing Test Rig 6 0 12 inch 4 in 2 0 USET Research Program (2005-2008): $787,300 Test Rig: $288,500 Radial Bearings Test Thrust Bearing Slave Thrust Bearings Rotor

32. Objective and Tasks (2005-2008) Test rig funded by USET (AF) program • Design and construction of thrust bearing test rig. • Measurements of minimum film thickness, pocket pressures, and flow rates in a water hybrid thrust bearing at various speeds and loads. • Comparison of test data to prediction of performance from XLHYDROTHRUST.