1 / 37

Lecture #1 2 Stress state of sweptback wing

Lecture #1 2 Stress state of sweptback wing. STRUCTURAL LAYOUT OF SWEPTBACK WINGS. Boeing 757. 2. STRUCTURAL LAYOUT OF SWEPTBACK WINGS. 3. STRUCTURAL LAYOUT OF SWEPTBACK WINGS. 4. STRUCTURAL LAYOUT OF SWEPTBACK WINGS. 5. STRUCTURAL IDEALIZATION. 6. STRUCTURAL IDEALIZATION. 7.

hart
Télécharger la présentation

Lecture #1 2 Stress state of sweptback wing

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Lecture #12 Stress state of sweptback wing

  2. STRUCTURAL LAYOUT OF SWEPTBACK WINGS Boeing 757 2

  3. STRUCTURAL LAYOUT OF SWEPTBACK WINGS 3

  4. STRUCTURAL LAYOUT OF SWEPTBACK WINGS 4

  5. STRUCTURAL LAYOUT OF SWEPTBACK WINGS 5

  6. STRUCTURAL IDEALIZATION 6

  7. STRUCTURAL IDEALIZATION 7

  8. STRUCTURAL LAYOUT OF SWEPTBACK WING 1 – front fuse-lage beam; 2 – rear fuse-lage beam; 3 – fuselage rib; 4 – front spar continuation; 5 – root rib; 6 – front spar; 7 – ribs; 8 – rear spar; 9 – wingbox; 10 – end rib. 8

  9. STRUCTURAL IDEALIZATION 9

  10. DESIGN MODEL OF SWEPTBACK WING 10

  11. ASSUMPTIONS AND SIMPLIFICATIONS a) deformations are linear; b) displacements are small; c) wingbox has absolutely rigid cross section; d) the axial loads are carried only by spar caps; e) spar webs and skins carry only shear loads; f) the elements of the root triangle ABC and the fuselage structure (RR, FR, FSC, FFB, RFB) are planar beams, they are finitely rigid in their planes and absolutely flexible outside them; g) upper and lower skins of the root triangle do not carry any loads; h) the fuselage structure composed of beams FR, FFB, RFB is a spatial statically determinate system. 11

  12. STRUCTURAL IDEALIZATION 12

  13. AIM OF THE PROJECT The aim is to find the distribution of bending moments in root triangle beams. Other data (normal forces, shear flows) could not be used since it is obtained using very robust idealization. Actually, the wingbox is studied just to take its rigidity into account. 13

  14. ANALYSIS OF THE MODEL Kinematical analysis: 14

  15. ANALYSIS OF THE MODEL 15

  16. ANALYSIS OF THE MODEL Matrix for statical analysis: 16

  17. ANALYSIS OF THE MODEL Conclusion: The system is twice statically indeterminate. The force method will be used as one being optimal for systems with small degree of statical indeterminacy. 17

  18. FLOWCHART OF SOLUTION USING FORCE METHOD 18

  19. BASIC SYSTEM 19

  20. EQUIVALENT SYSTEM 20

  21. BASIC SYSTEM IN LOADED STATE 21

  22. FORCES IN LOADED STATE 22

  23. STRESS STATE OF WINGBOX – NORMAL FORCES The stress state of wingbox is a problem inside a problem, twice statically indeterminate. In contrast to general problem, it is solved using Papkovich’ theorem. 23

  24. STRESS STATE OF WINGBOX – SHEAR FLOWS 24

  25. STRESS STATE OF WINGBOX – SUPERPOSITION 25

  26. STRESS STATE OF WINGBOX – SUPERPOSITION 26

  27. LOADS ACTING ON ROOT TRIANGLE BEAMS 27

  28. STRESS STATE OF ROOT TRIANGLE BEAMS 28

  29. BASIC SYSTEM IN 1ST UNIT STATE 29

  30. FORCES IN 1ST UNIT STATE 30

  31. FORCES IN 1ST UNIT STATE 31

  32. LOADING OF ROOT TRIANGLE IN 1ST UNIT STATE 32

  33. MOMENTS IN ROOT TRIANGLE IN 1ST UNIT STATE 33

  34. TABLE FOR MOMENTS IN DIFFERENT STATES 34

  35. SYSTEM OF CANONICAL EQUATIONS We have twice statically indeterminate problem: 35

  36. TABLE FOR MOMENTS IN DIFFERENT STATES Each of coefficients has three terms; last term is from bending moments: 36

  37. EXAMPLE FOR A TOTAL STRESS STATE

More Related