1 / 19

Preliminary Report on People’s Trust on Public Institution in Nepal

Preliminary Report on People’s Trust on Public Institution in Nepal.

haruko
Télécharger la présentation

Preliminary Report on People’s Trust on Public Institution in Nepal

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Preliminary Report onPeople’s Trust on Public Institution in Nepal A survey conducted by “Governance Matters Assessing, Diagnosing, Analyzing Challenges of Governance in Nepal” of the joint research project between Central Department of Public Administration, Tribhuvan University, Nepal and Department of Administration and Organization Theory, Bergen University, Norway July 14, 2008

  2. Methodology of the study • Sampliing on the basis of ecological zone, developmental regions, rural and urban • Respondents- Randomly on the basis of households and gender • 17 districts from five development regions; 3 from mountains, 9 from hill & five from Terai on the basis of ecological belt • Total 1836 respondents; Details of the study areas Details of the respondents

  3. Characteristics of Respondents

  4. Findings of the trust survey 1. Happy not happy Scale- Five points scale, 1- Not at all happy, 2- not very happy, 3- Quite happy, 4- very happy, 5- donot know N= 1633 to 1780

  5. 2. Satisfaction as a whole Ten Points scales- 1- Highly Unsatisfactory to 10- highly satisfactory N=1481 to 1773

  6. 3. Trust on Public Organizations Five points scale:1-Not at all satisfied, 2- Not very satisfied, 3- Rather satisfied, 4- Very satisfied, 5- Dont know N= 1699 to 1756

  7. 4. Trust on Professions Five points scale- 1- Very negative, 2- Negative, 3-Neither negative nor positive, 4- Positive & 5- Very positive N= 1495-1806

  8. 5. Proudness Scale- Five points; 1- Not at all proud, 2- Not very proud, 3-Quite proud, 4- Very proud, 5- Donot know N= 1365 to1808

  9. 6. Evaluation of Public Organization and Public employees Scale- Five points scale, 1- Strongly disagree, 2- Quite disagree, 3- Partly agree, 4- Strongly agree, 5- Donot know N= 1666 to1755

  10. 7. Role of political system for the good governance N= 1435 to 1604 Scale- Five points scale, 1- Strongly disagree,2- Quite disagree, 3- Partly agree, 4- Strongly agree, 5- Do not know

  11. 8. Statements to Public evaluation of political system, political parties and public services Scale- Five points scale, 1- Strongly disagree,2- Quite disagree, 3- Partly agree, 4- Strongly agree, 5- Do not know N= 1550 to1786

  12. 9. Public Services before five years and now Scale: Five points scale, 1- Very bad, 2- Bad, 3- Neither bad, nor good, 4- Good, 5-Very good N= 1496 to 1778 Contd.

  13. 9. Public Services …….. N= 1496 to1778 Scale: Five points scale, 1- Very bad, 2- Bad, 3- Neither bad, nor good, 4- Good, 5-Very good Contd.

  14. 9.Public Services ………. Scale: Five points scale, 1- Very bad, 2- Bad, 3- Neither bad, nor good, 4- Good, 5-Very good N= 1496 to 1778

  15. 10. Success of government in the following activities N= 1580 to 1769 Scale: Five points scale, 1- Succeded very well, 2- Succeded quite well, 3- Neither succeeded nor fail, 5- Did not quite succeeded

  16. 11. Influencing reasons of decision making in government Scale: 1- disagree completely, 2- Quite Disagree, 3- Quite agree, 4- Agree Completely, 5- Do not know N= 1152 to 1725

  17. 12. Corruption and misscellaneous Scale: Five points scale N= 1810 to 1821

  18. 13. Disaster Management Scale: Five points scale 1- Very inefficient, 2- Quite inefficient, 3-Neither efficient nor inefficient, 4- Quite efficient, 5-Very efficient N= 1732 to 1769

More Related