1 / 12

Navigating Transnational Transport Solutions: SINTROPHER Workshop Insights from Nijmegen

This intermediary report summarizes the SINTROPHER workshop held in Nijmegen on September 28, 2011, led by Charlotte Halpern from FNSP. The workshop explored the added value of transnational knowledge in advancing cost-effective transport solutions for peripheral regions in North-Western Europe. Key objectives included assessing collective learning opportunities among partners, identifying challenges to technology transfer, and examining successful public transport solutions. The findings contribute to understanding diverse transport innovations and the EU's urban mobility agenda, highlighting the need for hybrid and context-sensitive transport approaches.

hashim
Télécharger la présentation

Navigating Transnational Transport Solutions: SINTROPHER Workshop Insights from Nijmegen

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Going transnational? Progress on WP1A23 / Intermediary report SINTROPHER workshop, Nijmegen, September 28, 2011 Charlotte Halpern,FNSP / PACTE & UCL researcher

  2. Action WP1A23 - Objectives • What is the added value of transnational knowledge and transfer for the diffusion of cost-effective transport solutions in peripheral NWE regions ? • Assess the scope for collective learning among SINTROPHER Partners • Identify (legal, administrative, technical) challenges to technology transfer • Explore the scope for technical transfer from SINTROPHER to others in and outside NWE

  3. Intermediary report (Spring 2011)

  4. Output 1 – The EU urban mobility agenda • Transport as a controversial area of EU competence • The integration of railways • 3 Liberalization packages • Improving interoperability • Develop infrastructure BUT main focus on high speed • Old and new challenges • patterns of mobility, climate change, liberalization/privatization, devolution • New momentum : Green Paper (2007), Regulation on public services (2007), Action Plan (2009), White Book on transport (2011) • Maximise minimum intervention • - No common understanding on a single EU model of urban transport • - Increase information and knowledge through soft modes of governance & horizontal networks • - « Superficial learning » from member states & transport agencies

  5. Output 1 - Two conflicting dynamics SINTROPHER as a laboratory: medium-sized cities in peripheral areas + accessibility within/to/from

  6. Output 2 – Contrasting hypothesis => Explain the large variety of innovative and highly differentiated public transport solutions at the local level throughout Europe … some of which has led to remarkable failures.

  7. Output 2 : comparing 5 decision-making processes Comparative assessment of the development of new and improved tram projects in the 5 SINTROPHER partner regions. • Primary source investigation in all 5 partner regions : 1 interview guide,25 in-depth interviews, 5 study trips, 1 bilateral visit • Desk analysis: legislation, reports, media, etc.

  8. Output 2 : Identify 4 types of indicators

  9. Output 3 : 5 decision-making processes

  10. Output 4 : Suggestions for future transnational cooperation & learning within SINTROPHER and beyond

  11. Conclusions 1 • Hybrid transport solutions => bridge the gap between highly differentiated transport systems. • Highly contextualised according to the specific set of constraints and opportunities that they face locally, • Contribute to wider policy change by exploring beyond organizational, geographic and sectoral boarders: • Bypass the challenges raised by interoperability, • Explore original finance schemes • Develop new forms of cooperation with other local authorities, the private sector and civil society.

  12. Conclusions 2 • The EU urban mobility agenda is an indirect trigger for change BUT horizontal networks, private sector, cities & regions. • Similar problems, different solutions => PARTLY explained by national policies, need for contrasting hypothesis. • Diversity of innovations in transport => some are technical, but ALSO political, organizational, etc.

More Related