1 / 30

Engineering Economics: Internal Rate of Return (IRR) and Other Metrics

DADSS. Engineering Economics: Internal Rate of Return (IRR) and Other Metrics. Administrative Details. Homework #2 due Today, #3 due next week. Questions?. Agenda. IRR – Internal Rate of Return Comparing Projects EUAC – Effective Uniform Annual Cash Flows. Internal Rate of Return.

hastin
Télécharger la présentation

Engineering Economics: Internal Rate of Return (IRR) and Other Metrics

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. DADSS Engineering Economics: Internal Rate of Return (IRR) and Other Metrics

  2. Administrative Details • Homework #2 due Today, #3 due next week. • Questions?

  3. Agenda • IRR – Internal Rate of Return • Comparing Projects • EUAC – Effective Uniform Annual Cash Flows

  4. Internal Rate of Return • IRR is the “break-even” discount rate • First, look at calculating NPV • For some series of cash flows (CF) and some discount rate (r), we arrive at the net present value of the cash flow stream: NPV is some number

  5. Inverting NPV • For IRR, we want to solve for the r that will make the NPV = 0 • Consider a shorter cash flow stream: • Year 0: -$10 • Year 1: $12 • What is the NPV if the discount rate is 10%?

  6. Calculating IRR • Now, what would the IRR be? We want NPV = 0… • The IRR is 20% • That is, this project will at least break even (have a positive or zero NPV) until the discount rate exceeds 20%

  7. But wait… • There’s a complication • What happens with larger cash flow streams? • The IRR is the root of the discounted cash flow equation, which is a large polynomial

  8. Numerical Methods • Excel uses an algorithm (Newton-Raphson) to quickly find the correct IRR – given a guess • Another complication: Descartes’ Rule of Signs • The number of possible roots (or zeroes) of a polynomial is equal to the number of sign changes • Cash Flow Stream #1: 1 change in the cash flow • Year 0 1 2 3 4 5 • Cash Flow -10 +2 +2 +5 +5 +10 • Cash Flow Stream #2: 3 changes, 3 possible IRRs • Year 0 1 2 3 • Cash Flow -10 +47 –72 +36 • Use Excel’s MIRR function (modified IRR) to deal with this problem in a sophisticated way

  9. Calculating IRR Cash Flow Stream #1 Cash Flow Stream #2 IRR = 28% MIRR = 19% (with 10% reinvestment rate) IRR = 20%, 50%, 100% MIRR = 10% (with 10% reinvestment rate)

  10. Comparing Projects • NPV • IRR • EUAC • Payback • Other…

  11. Two Projects • Simple question: which project is better? • Project A: IRR = 15% • Project B: IRR = 29%

  12. Two Project – with Cash Flows • Project A has a lower IRR, but would you really rather have B? • With NPV and a 10% discount rate: • Project A: $13,724 • Project B: $3 • What happened with IRR? • We’re comparing projects of differing scale • using a scale-free metric

  13. Another Two Projects • Forget IRR – we’ll go back to NPV • Which of the following two projects is better (r = 10%)? • Project A: NPV = $120,921 • Project B: NPV = $111,364 • Clearly, Project A, which has a higher NPV, is the better project

  14. Using NPV • Project A may have a higher NPV, but it’s tying up my capital 5x longer than Project B • With Project B, I get my capital back in Year 1 and can go invest in something else • So is Project A really better? • What are we missing? Our tools aren’t working!

  15. Comparing Projects • Apples and Oranges • In the IRR example, we compared projects of differing scale using a scale-free metric • In the NPV example, we compared projects of differing time horizons using a time-neutral metric • That doesn’t work!

  16. What is the “Magic Metric”? • There is no one “correct” measure • IRR has several problems • Multiple roots • Scale insensitivity • But IRR is popular in the business world – it’s easy for people to think in “returns” • NPV is almost always a better measure of project performance, but must nevertheless be used carefully

  17. Another Popular Measure • Popular, but stupid: “Payback” • Payback = number of periods until original capital is returned • In this case, Project B has the shorter (“quicker”) payback, so it would be considered “better”

  18. Problems with Payback • It’s not hard to come up with examples that illustrate just how stupid payback is!

  19. Drawing a Conclusion • NPV, used properly, will never produce a misleading answer • IRR and Payback may produce misleading answers • What does “used correctly” mean? • As we’ve seen, NPV’s main problem is dealing with differing terms or non-synchronous cash flow streams

  20. Not equally spaced time intervals “Fixing” NPV -- Excel • Use XNPV to be explicit about the timing of cash flows

  21. Different Terms • There are three common solutions to the “differing terms” problem • Assume least common multiple repetition (the “common service period” approach) • Use a forward reinvestment rate • Calculate the EUAC

  22. LCM RepetitionLowest Common Multiplier • These projects can’t really be compared with NPV because they have unequal cash flow terms • One common solution is to assume that the projects can be repeated up to a total period determined by the least common multiple of their terms • LCM[2,3] = 6 • Project A gets repeated 3 times • Project B gets repeated 2 times • Then, compare with NPV, IRR, etc.

  23. LCM Repetition • Accordingly, Project B is preferred • Problems: Why assume you will be able to repeat the projects?

  24. EUACEffective Uniform Annual Cash Flows • The easiest way to think of EUAC is as a more sophisticated version of the LCM repetition method • EUAC “annuitizes” uneven cash flow streams, turning NPV from a static number into what is effectively a rate (an amount per period) • Note: This does not completely address the “differing terms” issue because it doesn’t fully treat reinvestment opportunities! • EUAC is most useful for providing an easily-understandable means of comparing projects with highly variable cash flows

  25. Effective Uniform Annual Cash Flows • To transform the present value number into a rate, we need a way of averaging all of the cash flows received through time that actually recognizes the time value of money • Conceptually, it’s an annuity function • In Excel, the PMT function

  26. EUAC • EUAC = PMT(DiscRate,YearsCashFlow,-NPV) EUAC calculated using PMT function

  27. Effective Uniform Annual Cash Flows • NPV indicates Project B is optimal • EUAC indicates Project A is optimal • Both don’t fully treat the 2-year reinvestment possibility in Project A! • This is why they produce different optimal projects

  28. Effective Uniform Annual Cash Flows • What is EUAC really doing? • All it’s doing is smoothing out the cash flow stream (hence the “uniform”)

  29. Effective Uniform Annual Cash Flows • If the cash flows are already uniform, then EUAC doesn’t add any new information – which tells us something: • The less uniform the cash flows, the more useful EUAC becomes

  30. Sensitivity Analysis • The fundamental lesson is all of this is that there is no one over-arching “perfect” metric • Robustness & Convergent Validity • How sensitive is the ranking of outcomes to the inputs? • Is there a consensus across metrics? • In other words: does it matter?

More Related