1 / 92

Architecture Review Boards Foundation Commitment Review

Architecture Review Boards Foundation Commitment Review. Web Based Product Configurator And Data Service System. Fall 2012 Team 3 Nov. 2 nd , 2012. Internal Independent Verification and Validation. Jordan Padams. Agenda. Internal Independent Verification and Validation.

havard
Télécharger la présentation

Architecture Review Boards Foundation Commitment Review

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Architecture Review BoardsFoundation Commitment Review Web Based Product Configurator And Data Service System Fall 2012 Team 3 Nov. 2nd , 2012

  2. Internal Independent Verification and Validation Jordan Padams

  3. Agenda Internal Independent Verification and Validation • Team Strong/Weak Points • Technical Concerns and Solutions • Operational Risks • WinWin Shaping Status • Project Evaluation

  4. Team Strong Points Internal Independent Verification and Validation • Operational View • Dev Team and Client Communication • Technical View • Prototype development

  5. Team Weak Points Internal Independent Verification and Validation • Operational View • Separation of concerns • Technical View • Experience • Web development • Embedded systems • Cellular technologies

  6. Technical Concerns Internal Independent Verification and Validation • Unknown requirements surrounding sensor telecom module • Prerequisite for data ingest service • Unsure what will/will not be included with module • Could effect requirements • Solution • Client understands risks • Leverage incremental commitment model • Prototype potential data ingest services

  7. Operational Risks Internal Independent Verification and Validation • Future System Maintainer Unknown • May not be web savvy • Mitigations • WYSIWYG interface for maintaining web content • Extensive documentation for system

  8. WinWin Shaping Status Internal Independent Verification and Validation • 10 Open WinCs • Known nice-to-have features • Evolutionary • 11 Agreed WinCs without issues • 7 Agreed WinCs with issues

  9. Project Evaluation Internal Independent Verification and Validation • SCS – Highly involved, enthusiastic • Precedentedness – Low/Nominal • Communication • Email • Telecons • join.me • Skills and experience are adequate

  10. Operational Concept Description JiZhou Lu

  11. Agenda Operational Concept Description • System purpose • Shared vision -Benefit-chain diagram -System boundary • Proposed new system • Desired capabilities and goals

  12. System Purpose Operational Concept Description • Our client Somatis, a start-up company • They sell hardware solutions in the robotic and sensor industry • The sales and After-sale service need support by our system • To increase customer satisfaction, company reputation, sales and profits

  13. Benefit-Chain Diagram – Part I Operational Concept Description

  14. Benefit-Chain Diagram – Part II Operational Concept Description

  15. System Boundary Operational Concept Description

  16. Current Company Business Workflow Operational Concept Description

  17. Proposed New Business Workflow – Part I Operational Concept Description

  18. Proposed New Business Workflow – Part II Operational Concept Description

  19. Desired Capability Goals Operational Concept Description

  20. Desired Level of Service Goals Operational Concept Description

  21. Desired Organizational Goals Operational Concept Description • Increase profits for the company. • Increase data availability of sensor data service. • Further increase efficiency of data management. • Increase flexibility of sensor module features, strengthen the communication with the system. • Create marketing tools

  22. Requirements QiuYang Liu

  23. Agenda Requirements Requirements for Three Major Components • Sensor Data Service • Data Ingestion Module • Data Manipulation Module • Sensor Configurator • Website Improvement

  24. Data Ingestion Module Requirements • System can store incoming data to database • Customer have X MB data for free, and is able to purchase more • Notification to users based on sensor events

  25. Data Manipulation Module Requirements • Export data to external files, i.e. CSV • View, Search and Manage Data

  26. Sensor Configurator Requirements • Customer login by personal username and password • Novice: • Customer s will be guided by list of questions • Most suitable combination will be selected • Expert: • All of the sensor parts will be listed with detail specs • Customer will be able to tailor the product at will • Notification to sales department • Order confirmation emails

  27. Website Improvement Requirements • Dynamic / Static Content update • Social Media Integration • User Forum • Customer Service • Discussion for products

  28. Miscellaneous Requirements • $2500 Budget • 2 Hours/month downtime for database • 10 concurrent user • Maximum 50% downtime for website • Support major browsers (IE, Chrome, Firefox and Safari)

  29. Prototype Xianan Fan

  30. Agenda • Website Mock-up Design • Wordpress Based Homepage • Initial Configurator Prototype • Initial Data Ingest Service Prototype

  31. Balsamiq Mock-up Homepage • Win Conditions: • View Dynamic Content • View Static Content

  32. Balsamiq Mock-up Data Manager Page • Win Conditions: • View and Search Ingested Data • Manage Data • Export Data to External Files

  33. Balsamiq Mock-up Mode Selection Page • Win Conditions: • Customize Product based on Expertise • Provide Different Customization Path (i.e. Questions VS. Detailed Specs)

  34. Balsamiq Mock-up Novice Mode • Win Conditions: • Guided by Questions in Novice Mode • Be able to Config Sensor, Com, Power Supply and Services

  35. Balsamiq Mock-up Expert Mode • Win Conditions: • Detailed Specs are Shown to Help Selection • Be able to Config Sensor, Com, Power Supply and Services

  36. Homepage Prototype Wordpress Based Homepage • Implemented in Wordpress • Unified theme • Features: • YouTube Integration for Company Introduction • Live Facebook Posts Support • Other Pages in Progress

  37. Configurator Prototype Configurator • Features: • Summary Updated in Real Time • Tabbed View • Animation

  38. Data Ingest Service Prototype Data Ingest Service • Features: • Pub/Sub model for handle incoming data • POSIX for multi-thread • Python mock data

  39. DEMO

  40. Architecture Dian Peng

  41. Agenda Architecture • Top Level Overview • NDI/COTS Selection • CMS Platform - Website • Configurator • Newly Developed Code • Physical Deployment

  42. The system has 3 sub-systems • The system connects with clients through Internet Top Level Overview

  43. NDI/COTS Selection • Take advantage of existing codebase for website improvement and sensor configurator • However, NDI/COTS can’t meet all requirements of the above 2 sub-systems • Possible NDI candidates for these 2 sub-system are WordPress and Joomla

  44. CMS Selection - Wordpress NDI/COTS Selection Account Module Content Update Module Product Configurator Module 100% 100% 0% WordPress 0% 100% 90% Social Media Pub/Sub Module User Forum

  45. Pro and Con of Wordpress NDI/COTS Selection Advantages: • Very flexible way to extend the codebase. • Good community supporting and huge amounts of third party plugins. • Easy to use and user friendly interface. • Complete documentation. • Light-weight and good for content heavy website. Disadvantages: • Lacks good account security coping mechanism. • Lacks direct support for CMS like Joomla.

  46. CMS Selection - Joomla NDI/COTS Selection Account Module Content Update Module Product Configurator Module 70% 80% 10% Joomla 0% 0% 90% Social Media Pub/Sub Module User Forum

  47. Pro and Con of Joomla NDI/COTS Selection Advantages: • Very easy and flexible to build a new website • Attractive website templates and many great extensions. • Good documentation. • Good community support. • Fit for large company website developing. Disadvantages: • Joomla is not easy to use compared to WordPress. • Joomla development task more effort than WordPress. • Joomla contains too many functionality which is useless for our project.

  48. Value Based Decision Making NDI/COTS Selection Targets: • Clients requires the website easy to maintain and update ,since he is not the web technology expert. • The development team hopes the developing stage to be agile and without too heavy testing. • The schedule does not allow us to use too complicated technology. WordPress Reasoning: • WordPress is easy to tailor and easy to maintain by none-expert person. • WordPress is fit for middle and small scale website , even with complex requirements for e-commerce and content management. • Even later we find out that WordPress is not fit for the development , the existed WordPress codebase can be imported into Joomla by importer

  49. Data Ingestion Service Newly Developed Code • No NDI/COTS available • Requirements: • It should use private protocol built on TCP/IP to communicate with sensor for security reason. • It should handle evolution and QOS requirement properly. • It is the most significant module in the system and has highest priority. • Current Prototype: • Use multi-thread and multi-process architecture. • Develop by pure C language. • Make the server software cross-platform.

More Related