1 / 1

Strategic Plan Development Process for Campus Stakeholder Engagement

This document outlines the comprehensive process for developing the strategic plan at MSJC. It includes discussions with various campus constituencies, gathering input from Instructional Services, Student Services, and Administrative Services. Key steps include creating decision data packets, conducting workshops, and vetting input from faculty, staff, administration, and students. The final plan is collaboratively developed, reviewed, and edited by the campus community, culminating in presentations to the Senates and Board of Trustees for approval. This strategic planning process ensures alignment with institutional priorities and goals.

haven
Télécharger la présentation

Strategic Plan Development Process for Campus Stakeholder Engagement

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. MSJC Strategic Plan Development Process Oversight Flow Process Campus Communication Project is presented to and discussed with campus constituencies • Instructional Services (IS) Input • Representative working group identified • Decision data packets distributed • Representatives gather input from colleagues • IS working session held to gather input • Review campus priorities/themes • Generate goals, objectives, activities, benchmarks, evaluation criteria, resources required. • Input is vetted, discussed, finalized • Summary of IS goals/objectives prepared Board and President • Decision Data Gathered • Assessment officer input • ALO input, IE office oversight • Institutional researcher • Internal/external trend data • Focus groups, discussions IPC • Process Finalized • Input forms/format • Workshops scheduled • Vetting/review methodology • Student Services (SS) Input • SS folks are provided with IS goals to incorporate and advance with their goals • Same structure and process as above SPC IE • Input Generated/Organized • Workshops conducted • Input vetted, discussed, finalized • Input from: • Faculty • Staff • Admin • Comm. • Students • Admin Services (AS) Input • AS folks are provided with IS goals and SS goals to incorporate and advance with their goals • Same structure and process as above • Strategic Plan Finalized • Draft assembled • Campus view and editing • Near final draft prepared • Campus review and editing • Final version prepared and posted online • Plan presented to Senates • Plan presented to Board of Trustees IPC= Institutional Planning Committee SPC= Strategic Planning Committee IE= Office of Institutional Effectiveness

More Related