1 / 20

Identifying Sensitive Aquifers in Ohio

Identifying Sensitive Aquifers in Ohio. Chris Kenah, Michael. W. Slattery, Linda. D. Slattery, and Michael Eggert Ohio EPA, Division of Drinking and Ground Waters. DMT’06. Outline. Logic for identifying sensitive aquifers Suspected sensitive aquifers

haven
Télécharger la présentation

Identifying Sensitive Aquifers in Ohio

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Identifying Sensitive Aquifers in Ohio Chris Kenah, Michael. W. Slattery, Linda. D. Slattery, and Michael Eggert Ohio EPA, Division of Drinking and Ground Waters DMT’06

  2. Outline • Logic for identifying sensitive aquifers • Suspected sensitive aquifers • Water Quality/SWAP data - Impacted PWSs • Analysis of ODNR glacial aquifer attributes and location of impacted PWSs • Differences between geologic setting and lithologic attributes • Ohio Sensitive Aquifers

  3. Data Sources • Geologic Information • Recharge Pathways • ODNR Aquifer Maps • PWS Compliance and Ambient Data • Nitrate, VOC, SOC • Special Study Knowledge

  4. Logic for Sensitive Aquifer ID • Short or Rapid Recharge Pathways • Areas of Ground Water - Surface Water Interaction • Recharge through Glacial Drift • Identify glacial settings with rapid recharge

  5. Sensitive Glacial Settings • Buried Valleys - sand & gravel aquifers • Fine to coarse grained material • Buried valley, alluvial, out wash/kame, and beach ridge geologic settings • Thin Glacial Drift - over bedrock aquifers • Fined grained - tills and lacustrine deposits • Lacustrine, ground and end moraine settings

  6. Ohio SWAP Program • SWAP Susceptibility Analysis • Includes evaluation of compliance data; • 516 PWSs Highly Susceptible • Based on water quality compliance data • Nitrate > 2.0 mg/L • VOC or SVOC detections

  7. WQ Impacts in Sensitive Aquifers? • Attach glacial aquifer attributes to PWS locations • Evaluate PWS WQ impact association with: • Glacial geologic settings • Glacial lithologies • Compare percentage of PWSs impacted

  8. Data Limitations • ODNR aquifer maps thickness are ranges not well depths • If glacial drift < 25’, bedrock production well likely • If glacial drift > 25’, production may be in drift • In thicker glacial sand and gravels, well depth may not approach glacial drift thickness • In thicker till lithologies, production may come from sand lenses or bedrock • Utilizing statewide generalizations

  9. Rapid Recharge to Fractured Bedrock

  10. PWS Water Quality Impacts - Geologic Settings

  11. PWS Water Quality Impacts – Lithologic Association

  12. Sensitive Aquifers • PWSs with WQ impacts associated with: • Coarse S&G aquifers • Thin Tills (0-25 ‘) • Aquifers composed of fines provide more protection than S&G aquifers and thin tills over bedrock aquifers; • Thick tills are associated with low % of PWSs with WQ impacts (3-4 %)

  13. Future Activities - Sensitive Aquifers • Attach glacial drift thickness, DRASTIC ranking, and soil properties to PWS locations for analysis of WQ impacts • Incorporate well casing length and depth as analysis factors • Evaluate dissolved vs particulate sensitivity • Identify areas where horizontal flow pro-vides rapid recharge • Short term sampling in sensitive aquifers

  14. Rapid Horizontal Recharge Linked with Flooding

  15. Acknowledgments • Data: • Ohio EPA Staff • PWS Operators • ODNR Aquifer Map • GIS Support: • Ohio EPA, DDAGW GIS Unit

More Related