1 / 4

Review

This review discusses the admissibility of LL's testimony in a legal context, exploring why it is not considered hearsay. Key points include Dan's position as the declarant and that the testimony is against his interests, establishing it as a verbal act relevant to fraud claims. The implications for jury persuasion and the probative nature of the testimony are highlighted in relation to the elements of the case, including potential issues regarding Bill & the Door as well as Ben & the Architect scenarios.

hayes-fuentes
Télécharger la présentation

Review

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Review

  2. Do Problem 44

  3. Part of an Answer LL’s testimony is admissible. • It is not hearsay since • Dan is the declarant • It is being offered against Dan • It is not offered for the TOMS since • It is a verbal act (fraud) • P wants jury to disbelieve it • It is relevant since probative of element (a).

  4. If There’s Time • Do Bill & the Door Problems • Ben & the Architect Problems

More Related