1 / 18

Status of LIGO

Status of LIGO. Laser Interferometer Gravitational-wave Observatory. Hanford, WA. Livingston, LA. Nergis Mavalvala MIT IAU214, August 2002. Michelson Interferometer. D L = h L. h ~ 10 -21. Pirani ‘56, Gerstenshtein and Pustovoit, Weber, Weiss ’72.

hchamberlain
Télécharger la présentation

Status of LIGO

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Status of LIGO Laser Interferometer Gravitational-wave Observatory Hanford, WA Livingston, LA Nergis MavalvalaMITIAU214, August 2002

  2. Michelson Interferometer DL = h L h ~ 10-21 Pirani ‘56, Gerstenshtein and Pustovoit, Weber, Weiss ’72 Gravitational wave Interferometers: the principle General Relativity (Einstein 1916) predicts freely propagating transverse space-time distortions IAU214 - August 2002

  3. Initial Advanced Why an Observatory? • Two sites • Three interferometers • Coincidence • Long lifetime • Facilities limits • First detector (LIGO I) • Now • This talk • Advanced detectors (LIGO II and beyond) • 2006++ IAU214 - August 2002

  4. Past…Future IAU214 - August 2002

  5. Initial LIGO Sensitivity Goal • Strain sensitivity < 3x10-23 1/Hz1/2at 200 Hz • Displacement Noise • Seismic motion • Thermal Noise • Radiation Pressure • Sensing Noise • Photon Shot Noise • Residual Gas • Facilities limits much lower IAU214 - August 2002

  6. Vacuum 20 kW 10 W Laser 4 km 300 W Input Optics Detector Overview IAU214 - August 2002

  7. Seismic Isolation • Seismic isolation stacks • Stainless steel masses  600 kg each stage • Helicoil springs with lossy viscoelastic layer  Q ~ 40 • 3 to 4 stages  10-6 to 10-8 for f > 10 Hz IAU214 - August 2002

  8. Core Optics • 25 cm diameter, 10 kg fused silica optics • Polished substrates • Micro-roughness  < 10 ppm scatter • Optical coatings • < 2 ppm scatter • < 1 ppm absorption • Metrology  • Surface uniformity~1 nm rms IAU214 - August 2002

  9. Suspensions • Single wire loop suspensions • Four electromagnetic actuators • Four ‘shadow’ sensors for local position sensing Small optic Large optic IAU214 - August 2002

  10. Optical Design of the Interferometers Requires test masses to be held in position to 10-10-10-13 meter: “Locking the interferometer” Light bounces in arm cavities ~130 times a increased phase sensitivity Light is “recycled” ~30 to 50 times InputOptics Laser Dark fringe signal IAU214 - August 2002

  11. Interferometer Sensing and Control Pre-Mode Cleaner Laser IAU214 - August 2002

  12. Engineering Run 7 (E7): LIGO + GEO + ALLEGRO IAU214 - August 2002

  13. Strain Sensitivity during E7 IAU214 - August 2002

  14. Evolution of strain sensitivity Major improvements • Front-end electronics (ADC) noise  whiten signal • Laser frequency noise  common-mode servo • Output electronics (DAC) noise  whiten signal • Sensing electronics noise  increase light level IAU214 - August 2002

  15. All three interferometers locked for hours at a time in power-recycled configuration a Grec ~ 15 – 45 Lock acquisition is done using sys id methods a MTTL ~ 1 – 2 minute Optical parameters consistent with lab metrology a mirror losses < 70 ppm Tidal feedback systems operational a range of 200 mm pk-pk Mechanical (internal) modes of test masses excited a 104 < Q < 107 Laser input power 1 – 5 W but all light power not detected (PD saturations) Coupling to environment, e.g. Aircrafts flying by can be seen (heard?) Earthquakes Trains twice a day at Livingston Anthropogenic noise LIGO I Status Summary: What works IAU214 - August 2002

  16. Seismic pre-isolation system At LLO 10x reduction in rms displacement of optics desired Active sensing and piezoelectric actuation system installed Hydraulic actuation prototyping underway for installation in 2003 Digital controls for optics suspension systems Greater flexibility for tuning servos Easier to orthogonalize displacement and angles of optic Installed/tested on Hanford 4km L4k, e.g., limited by coil driver noise at low frequencies Alignment control systems Partially operational (feedback loops closed on 2 – 4 of 12 degrees of freedom) Necessary to reduce spurious signals at AS port that causes photodiode saturations Increase detected light levels  overcome sensing noise at high frequencies Electronics improvements New system layout being designed (EMI/RFI mitigation) Lower noise A/D converters LIGO I Status Summary:What doesn’t (yet) IAU214 - August 2002

  17. The Task Ahead • Engineering runs • Characterize and improve detector sensitivity and reliability • Exercise data analysis system end-to-end pipeline • Science runs • Upper limits (E7 and beyond) • Scientific searches (S1 begins 08/23/02) • Commissioning remaining subsystems • Factor of 100 (above 400 Hz) to 100000 (at 40 Hz) improvement needed to reach design sensitivity • LIGO II R&D already underway IAU214 - August 2002

  18. Detection Strategy: Coincidences • Two sites – three interferometers • Single interferometer  50/hr (non-gaussian level) • Hanford 4km + 2km  1/day (correlated rate) • Hanford + Livingston  0.1/yr (uncorrelated) • Data recording (time series) • Gravitational wave signal = 0.2 MB/sec • Total data = 16 MB/sec • On-line filters, diagnostics, data compression • Off-line data analysis, archiving… • Signal extraction • Signal from noise (vetoes, noise analysis) • Templates, wavelets… IAU214 - August 2002

More Related