1 / 23

Population concerns about noise

Environment and health aspects of noise assessments EIONET workshop on noise EEA, Copenhagen, 26-27 June 2007. Population concerns about noise. Figure A. EU-15 proportion of population living in households considering that they suffer from noise and from pollution (%). A. B.

hedwig
Télécharger la présentation

Population concerns about noise

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Environment and health aspects of noise assessments EIONET workshop on noiseEEA, Copenhagen, 26-27 June 2007

  2. Population concerns about noise Figure A. EU-15 proportion of population living in households considering that they suffer from noise and from pollution (%) A B Figure B. Proportion of population living in households considering that they suffer from noise and from pollution, by country (2000) (%) Eurostat, 2006. Measuring progress towards more sustainable Europe.SD indicators for the EU, data 1990-2005

  3. Human impacts of environmental noise • Environmental noise affects people’s health and well being as it interferes with basic activities such as: • sleeping • resting • studying • communicating • There is growing evidence that environmental noise is not merely an annoyance, but has a range of adverse health, social and economic effects

  4. What are the effects of environmental noise ? • Hearing impairment, tinnitus • Sleep disturbances • Interference with the spoken communication • Disturbances in mental health • Impaired task performance • Negative social behaviour and annoyance reactions • Cardiovascular disturbances

  5. Grading of noise effects on health Mortality Adverse Morbidity effects Pathophysiological changes Physiological changes of unknown consequences Effects Annoyance Number of exposed individuals Babisch, 2002, adapted from Wichmann,1992

  6. The scheme for noise effect reactions Babisch, 2002

  7. Impacts of noise are enhanced by interactions with other environmental stressors, such as air pollution and chemicals

  8. Causal web of noise impacts on health Causal framework linking multiple risk factors and outcomes • Components of causal web: • Distal and proximal causes • Social and behavioural determinants • Pathophysiological pathway • Outcomes • Linkages among factors and outcomes • Action points for intervention

  9. Causal web of impacts of environmental noise • R. Kim, WHO, EURO ECEH. Workshop on EBD, EEA, September 2006

  10. Concerns on environmental noise in Europe • Environmental Noise Directive (2002/49/EC 2002) • assessment and management of environmental noise • action plans to reduce harmful effects of noise exposure • The EU Sixth Environmental Action Programme • the aim to ‘substantially reducing the number of people regularly affected by long-term average levels of noise, in particular from traffic, which …cause detrimental effects on human health’ • Children’s Environmental Health Action Plan for Europe (WHO, 2004) • … children should be protected from exposure to harmful noise at home and at school (RPG IV)

  11. ‘Europe’s Environment: the 4th assessment’ - report prepared by EEA for the Ministerial Conference, Belgrade, 2007 ‘Noise – an emerging environmental health concern’ included in Chapter 2: ‘Environment and health and quality of life’

  12. Noise in Belgrade report – country examples • Spain: • 41 % of the surveyed people feel highly disturbed by traffic noise • Norway: • noise annoyance for road traffic increased by 5 % from 1999 to 2003 • 5 % of the population have noise-related sleep problems • Germany: • 60 % of the population annoyed by road traffic noise; 10 % highly annoyed • 3 % of acute myocardial infarctions per year attributed to road traffic noise • The Netherlands: • 29 % of the national survey respondents severely annoyed by road traffic • 12 % severely annoyed by noise form air traffic and neighbors; • increasing need for quieter residential areas from 8 % (1993) to 10 % (2004) Europe’s Environment: the 4th assessment, EEA, 2007

  13. Temporary hearing deficiencies caused by noise of German children

  14. Noise in the Belgrade report- summary Several countries have national or local estimates of noise exposure and the associated health effects Compared to noise from neighbours and industry, a lot of people are severely annoyed by noise from transport‑related sources Due to differences in the measurement of annoyance and definition of sources, only an indicative comparison between countries and regions is now possible

  15. Estimating impacts of environmental noise in Europe The overall burden of ill health due to noise in Europe has not yet been quantified However, there are ongoing projects aiming to provide estimates of noise impacts on health as well as methodological guidance

  16. WHO EBD project on noise impacts • The project aims to provide: • a guidance to the Member States on the estimation of burden of disease • related to environmental noise • preliminary estimates of environmental burden of diseases (EBD) due to environmental noise in Europe • Definition of environmental noise for the project: • non-occupational, traffic noise from road, train, air, and leisure noise • Health outcomes considered: • cardiovascular disease • cognitive impairment • hearing loss, tinnitus • sleep disturbance, annoyance • Final report expected by the end of 2007 • R. Kim, WHO, EURO ECEH. Workshop on EBD, EEA, September 2006

  17. Conceptual basis for EBD assessment Based on available data on distribution of exposure to noise in the population and exposure-response relationship, the population attributable risks (impact fraction) are calculated for specific health outcomes, and applied to the global burden of disease, expressed as DALYs (disability adjusted life years) • WHO, EURO ECEH, 2006

  18. Uncertainties Population distribution of exposure • lack of accurate exposure data in the countries and sub-regions leads to inaccurate impact fraction • noise mapping data for Environmental Noise Directive • lack of gender- and age-specific exposure data • use of uniform exposure indicators (eg. Lden) Exposure-risk relationship Interaction with other environmental factors Problem of extrapolating exposure and attributable fractions between countries • R. Kim, WHO, EURO ECEH. Workshop on EBD, EEA, September 2006

  19. WHO Night Noise Guidelinesfor Europe Provide ‘health-based’ guidance to interprete exposure data Linked to the END - relating to the assessment and management of environmental noise Extension of WHO Guidelines for Community Noise (2000) Recommend interim targets for gradual achievements of the ultimate targets depending on the national priorities and situations. The threshold levels of Lnight are: 30 dB - Night Noise Guideline (NNGL) 40 dB - Interim Target I (IT-I) 55 dB - Interim Target II (IT-II) Publication of the Guidelines is expected in September 2007 • WHO EURO, ECEH, 2007

  20. Health Impact Assessment of noise • Activities within the WHO coordinated ENHIS project • Case study: HIA for children aged up to 14 years, who live in proximity to traffic noise • Coverage: two cities in North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany • Preliminary findings: • approximately 5% of children highly disturbed in their sleep due to traffic noise • between 5 - 10 % of all exposed children highly annoyed by road traffic noise • impossible extrapolation to the rest of North Rhine-Westphalia due to differences in exposure and population structure Source: http://enhiscms.rivm.nl/object_document/o4638n27773.html

  21. E&H indicator – Population exposed to various noise levelranges per source • Estimation on the number of people living in dwellings exposed from different sources of environmental noise in urban areas and along major transport infrastructures to specified ranges of values of Lden in dB, 4 m above the ground on the most exposed façade: • Lden (day-evening-night equivalent level): 55-59, of Lden in dB;60-64, of Lden in dB; 65-69, of Lden in dB 70-74, of Lden in dB; >75 of Lden in dB; separately for road, rail and air traffic, and for industrial sources • Lnight (night equivalent level) : 50-54, 55-59, 60-64, 65-69, >70; separately for road, rail and air traffic, and for industrial sources Source: ECOEHIS, 2004

  22. Implementation of END and better, comparable exposure information in the EU member states is expected to improve assessments of impacts of environmental noise on health and well-being, and to better target actions to protect population health

  23. Thank you for your attention

More Related