1 / 18

Ethics in Medical Sciences June 2018

Ethics in Medical Sciences June 2018. Jonas Josefsson, Department of Philosophy, lu. Research in medical science. Topics for today : Ethics in medical research Ethics and clinical trials Group discussion Authorship in research Group discussion. Ethics in medical sciences.

helen
Télécharger la présentation

Ethics in Medical Sciences June 2018

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Ethics in Medical SciencesJune 2018 Jonas Josefsson, Department of Philosophy, lu

  2. Research in medical science Topics for today: • Ethics in medical research • Ethics and clinicaltrials • Group discussion • Authorship in research • Group discussion.

  3. Ethics in medicalsciences Topics for today: • Ethics in medical research • Ethics and clinicaltrials • Group discussion • Authorship in research • Group discussion.

  4. Ethics in medical science Ethical (Moral) theories: • Religiousethics (deontologic) • NaturalLaw (deontologic) • Kantianism (deontologic) • Consequentialism • Virtueethics • Mixtures (e.g. principlism by Beauchamp/Childress, or commonsensemorality)

  5. Ethics in medical science Deontological theories - Kantianism: • The right action is the action that is in accordance with a duty to its performance. • The right action is the action that is covered by the acknowledged rule according to which the action is mandatory (e.g. rights, duties) • Always recognize that human individuals are ends, and do not use them as means to your end.

  6. Ethics in medical science Consequentalist theories: • The right action is producing the best consequences in terms of e.g. welfare, utility, satisfaction of preferences, interests etc. • Eg. Utilitarianism (e.g. Peter Singer)

  7. Ethics in medical science Utilitarianism: • The right action is producing the best consequences in terms of e.g. welfare, utility, satisfaction of preferences, interests etc. • Peter Singer: maximize interest-satisfaction. • Which interests? • Speciesism?

  8. Ethics in medical science Bioethics History: • Medical ethics – ancientGreece 400 BC (Hippocrates) • Nuremberg Trials (1947) – Informedconsent, human rights • HelsinkiDeclaration (1964>) informedconsent & medical research • Development of biotechnology (from 1970) • Human Genome Project (1990) • Enhancement? (2000>)

  9. Ethics and clinicaltrials Bioethics History: • Medical ethics – ancientGreece 400 BC (Hippocrates) • Nuremberg Trials (1947) – Informedconsent, human rights • HelsinkiDeclaration (1964>) – Informedconsent, medical research • Development of biotechnology (from 1970) • Human Genome Project (1990) • Enhancement? (2000>)

  10. Ethics and clinicaltrials Main problems: • Balancing human rightsand valueofmedical research. • Participantsareasked to take on risks in order to developknowledgewithoutdirect benefit to them.

  11. Ethics and clinicaltrials Informedconsent: • Information: Adequate information aboutstudy: purpose, procedure, risks, benefits, alternatives. • Understanding: Participantsshould understand the information. • Voluntary participation: incentives, no undueinfluence and no coercion to ensurefreeparticipation. • Writtenconsent

  12. Ethics and clinicaltrials Balancing human rights: • Valueof research • Fairness in selectionofparticipants • Adequate research (proper, valid etc) • Risk-benefit balance. Risk to participantsshould be justified by possiblebenefits • Informedconsent • Possibility to leavestudy

  13. Research ethics: Authorship Proper authorship credit

  14. Publicationethics - links Uniform Requirements for Manuscripts Submitted to Biomedical Journals: http://www.icmje.org/ Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE): http://publicationethics.org/

  15. Research ethics: Authorship Proper authorship credit: Proper authors/contributers: Authorship credit should be based on • substantial contributions to conception and design, acquisition of data, or analysis and interpretation of data • drafting the article or revising it critically for important intellectual content • final approval of the version to be published. Authors should meet conditions 1, 2, and 3. Uniform Requirements for Manuscripts Submitted to Biomedical Journals (October 2008)

  16. Research ethics: Authorship Non-proper authorship credit: • Gift-authors • Ghost-authors • Honorary authors • Prestige authors

  17. Research ethics: Publication Non-proper publication practices: • Plagiarism • Self-plagiarism • “Salami-papers” • “Double-dipping”

  18. Group discussions!

More Related