A Unified View of Graph Searching

1. A Unified View of Graph Searching Derek G. Corneil Richard Krueger

2. Outline • Goal and Motivation • Definitions and Notations • Graph Searching Characterization – • Basic line • Generic Searching • BFS • LexBFS • DFS • LexDFS • MNS • Conclusions

3. Goal and Motivation • Graph Search algorithms are commonly used. • The search is being applied through the neighborhood of the vertices. Each edge is traversed exactly once, and we eventually reach all vertices. • The algorithms are varied in selection of the next edge to traverse.

4. Goal and Motivation • Searching the graph creates an order of the vertices. • We can characterize the search algorithm by exploring the nature of the order it creates. • Such characterization can help us reveal the structure of a graph. • For example, the characterization of LexBFS helps in proving that the reverse of LexBFS-ordering of a chordal graph is a perfect elimination ordering.

5. Definitions and Notations • All related graphs are connected and undirected. •  = (v1,…, vn) – linear ordering of V. • (i) = vi and -1(vi( = I – refer to a specific vertex in . • G[i] = G[v1,…,vi] – be the subgraph of G induced on a prefix of  • Chordal graph – every cycle of length at least 4 has at least one chord. • Simplicial vertex – its neighborhood is a clique in G. • Perfect Elimination Order – ordering (v1,…,vn) of V of G, where vi is simplicial in gi.

6. a b c Graph Searching Characterization - Basic Line If a < b < c and acE and abE, then how could vertex b have been chosen before vertex c by our search ?

7. Generic Search Algorithm • The data structure S is generic “set” to store the candidate vertices. • Input : a graph G = (V, E) and start vertex s • Ouput : an ordering  of V • S  {s} • For i  1 to n do • Pick and remove an unnumbered vertex v from S • (i)  v • Foreach unnumbered vertex w adjacent to v do • Add w to S

8. a d b c Generic Search Characterization • (S): given an ordering  of V, if a < b < c and acE and abE, then there exists a vertex d < b such that dbE.

9. 1 2 3 4 5 6 Generic Search Characterization •  = (1,2,4,3,5,6) is a valid search-ordering of the 3-sun, but this ordering is neither DFS nor BFS. • By using more restrictive data structure we may obtain other properties for our search.

10. Generic Search Characterization • Theorem – For an arbitrary graph G, an ordering  of V is a search-ordering of G if and only if  has property (S). • Proof : •  At the point when b is chosen, both b and c must be in S. Therefore some neighbor of b must already been chosen, call it d. Thus d < b and dbE. This holds for all triples in , so property (S) holds on .

11. Generic Search Characterization •  suppose for contradiction that given , an order which respect property (S), vi is the first vertex in  that can’t be chosen next by the algorithm. So, vi is not in S yet. • Let u be the next vertex the algorithm choose. So, u is in S. • Let w be neighbor of u which caused him to be added to S. So, wuE, but wviE. • By applying (S) on the triple (w,vi,u), there exists d < vi with dviE. • Hence viS, so it could be chosen next. • A Contradiction.

12. BFS – Breadth First Search • BFS is a restriction of generic search in that it explores all neighbors of a selected vertex before it goes deeper in the graph. • It uses queue as its data structure to obtain the restriction. • However, it does not determine which order to push the neighbors of a chosen vertex.

13. BFS Algorithm • The data structure S is a queue. • Input : a graph G = (V, E) and start vertex s • Ouput : an ordering  of V • S  {s} • For i  1 to n do • pop v from S • (i)  v • Foreach unnumbered vertex w adjacent to v do • If w is not already in S then push w to S

14. d a b c BFS Characterization • (B): given an ordering  of V, if a < b < c and acE and abE, then there exists a vertex d < a such that dbE.

15. BFS Characterization • Theorem – For an arbitrary graph G, an ordering  of V is a BFS-ordering of G if and only if  has property (B). • Proof : •  At the point when b is chosen, both b and c must be in S. Therefore some neighbor of b was pulled from S as least as early as a, call it d. since b does not have a as a neighbor d must be earlier than a.

16. BFS Characterization •  suppose for contradiction that given  vi is the first vertex in  that can’t be chosen next by the algorithm. So vi is not in S yet. • Let u be the next vertex the algorithm choose, So there is a w < vi adjacent to u but not to vi. Choose w to be the leftmost such vertex in . • By applying (B) on the triple (w,vi,u), there exists d < vi with dviE. • Since w was chosen leftmost, any vertex left to w which is adjacent to u must also be adjacent to vi. • But d is left of w and adjacent to vi, therefore a BFS could choose vi before u. • A Contradiction.

17. LexBFS – Lexicographic BFS • LexBFS is a BFS with another restriction. • It creates an order between the neighbors of a selected vertex using lexicographic labeling of the vertices through the search.

18. LexBFS Algorithm • Input : a graph G = (V, E) and start vertex s • Ouput : an ordering  of V • Assign the label 0 to all vertices • Label(s)  {n+1} • For i  1 to n do • Pick an unnumbered vertex v with lexicographically largest label • (i)  v • Foreach unnumbered vertex w adjacent to v do • Append (n-i) to label(w)

19. 1 2 3 4 5 6 LexBFS Example 0 6 5 5 0 0 5 4 4 2 4 0 4 3 4 0 3 3 2 0  = { }  = { 1 2 }  = { 1 }  = { 1 2 3 }  = { 1 2 3 5 4 }  = { 1 2 3 5 }  = { 1 2 3 5 4 6 }

20. d a b c LexBFS Characterization • (LB): given an ordering  of V, if a < b < c and acE and abE, then there exists a vertex d < a such that dbE • and dcE.

21. LexBFS Characterization • Theorem – For an arbitrary graph G, an ordering  of V is a LexBFS-ordering of G if and only if  has property (LB). • The only difference between the algorithms is the requirement of dcE. • A LexBFS-ordering is a BFS-ordering, since (B) subsumes (LB).

22. DFS – Depth First Search • DFS explores the graph differently than BFS. • It progresses forward through the graph as much as possible, backtracking only when necessary, whereas BFS first explores close vertices before going deeper to the far more vertices. • It uses stack as its data structure to obtain this restriction.

23. DFS Algorithm • The data structure S is a stack. • Input : a graph G = (V, E) and start vertex s • Ouput : an ordering  of V • S  {s} • For i  1 to n do • pop v from S • (i)  v • Foreach unnumbered vertex w adjacent to v do • If w is already in S then remove w to S • Push w to S

24. a d b c DFS Characterization • (D): given an ordering  of V, if a < b < c and acE and abE, then there exists a vertex a < d < b such that dbE.

25. DFS Characterization • Theorem – For an arbitrary graph G, an ordering  of V is a DFS-ordering of G if and only if  has property (D).

26. LexDFS – lexicographic DFS • Looking at the relation between BFS and LexBFS, one naturally asks whether there is a “lexicographic analogue” of DFS. • Forcing the restriction that dcE on the DFS characterization, immediately creates a new algorithm and a characterization for it.

27. LexDFS • This algorithm must act as DFS and progress forward through the graph as much as possible, but also choose its next vertex that is adjacent to as many vertices we have most recently numbered as possible.

28. a d b c LexDFS Characterization • (LD): given an ordering  of V, if a < b < c and acE and abE, then there exists a vertex a < d < b such that dbE and dcE.

29. LexDFS Algorithm • Input : a graph G = (V, E) and start vertex s • Ouput : an ordering  of V • Assign the label  to all vertices • Label(s)  {0} • For i  1 to n do • Pick an unnumbered vertex v with lexicographically largest label • (i)  v • Foreach unnumbered vertex w adjacent to v do • Prepend i to label(w)

30. 1 2 3 4 5 6 LexDFS Example  0  1 2 1  1  4 2 2 2 3 2   3 4 3  = { 1 }  = { 1 2 3 5 6 }  = { 1 2 }  = {}  = { 1 2 3 }  = { 1 2 3 5 }  = { 1 2 3 5 6 4 }

31. 1 2 3 4 5 6 LexDFS Example 0 a d 1 2 1 c b 4 2 3 2 4 3 a d b c  = { 1 2 3 5 6 4 } Property (LD) is satisfied on the chosen triple (a,b,c)

32. LexDFS Characterization • Theorem – For an arbitrary graph G, an ordering  of V is a LexDFS-ordering of G if and only if  has property (LD).

33. Difference between LexBFS and LexDFS • LexBFS – we choose a vertex adjacent to as many earliest chosen vertices as possible. • LexDFS – we choose a vertex adjacent to as many most recently chosen vertices as possible. • The two algorithms have a common restriction - dcE.

34. MNS – Maximal Neighborhood Search • MNS is a generalization of LexBFS and LexDFS. • Its characterization is built from the Generic Search property (S) and the restriction dcE. • Pick a vertex whose neighborhood in the part of the graph already explored is maximal.

35. a d b c MNS Characterization • (M): given an ordering  of V, if a < b < c and acE and abE, then there exists a vertex d < b such that dbE and dcE.

36. MNS Characterization • Theorem – For an arbitrary graph G, an ordering  of V is a MNS-ordering of G if and only if  has property (M).

37. MNS Algorithm • Input : a graph G = (V, E) and start vertex s • Ouput : an ordering  of V • Assign the label  • Label(s)  {n+1} • For i  1 to n do • Pick an unnumbered vertex v with maximal label • (i)  v • Foreach unnumbered vertex w adjacent to v do • Add i to label(w)

38. a b c d Summary of search characterization Generic Search d < a a < d dcE BFS DFS dcE dcE MNS d < a a < d LexDFS LexBFS

39. Conclusions • The idea of characterization can be extended to more general environments. • These characterization can be applicable on multigraphs. • They give us better understanding of how a search reveals the structure of a graph • They allow us to employ multiple sweeps of a search to gather additional information about a graph.