1 / 23

Engineering Constraints

Engineering Constraints. Ellipses: Maybe too big; problem with western wall and central mound Bulk Inertia (TES, IRTM): 323, 316 Fine Comp. Inertia (IRTM): 240 Rocks (IRTM): 15 Albedo (TES): 0.215 Elevation: -3.6 km. Conclusions.

helmut
Télécharger la présentation

Engineering Constraints

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Engineering Constraints • Ellipses: Maybe too big; problem with western wall and central mound • Bulk Inertia (TES, IRTM): 323, 316 • Fine Comp. Inertia (IRTM): 240 • Rocks (IRTM): 15 • Albedo (TES): 0.215 • Elevation: -3.6 km

  2. Conclusions • Gale Crater is a fascinating site. Some good science can be done, but in situ examination of layers is difficult. • Slopes, ellipse size are major hurdle. • Etched, layered, and sedimentary material are within ellipse; chances of sampling by rover not guaranteed. • Some good MER science can be done. Probably Gale is best thought of as a “grab bag site” (given where ellipse is), but one which should still yield some exciting insight into Mars sedimentary processes.

More Related