1 / 54

Feed additives and feed efficiency in the pork industry

Feed additives and feed efficiency in the pork industry. F.R. Dunshea 1,2 1 CRC for High Integrity Pork; 2 Department of Agriculture and Food Systems, Melbourne School of Land and Environment, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC 3010;. We need technology.

helmut
Télécharger la présentation

Feed additives and feed efficiency in the pork industry

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Feed additives and feed efficiency in the pork industry F.R. Dunshea1,2 1CRC for High Integrity Pork; 2Department of Agriculture and Food Systems, Melbourne School of Land and Environment, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC 3010;

  2. We need technology https://www.elanco.com/Content/pdfs/2011_11068_Three-Rights-White-Paper-Revision_AI11224.pdf

  3. Some technologies • Porcine somatotropin (pST, Reporcin) • β-agonists (ractopamine, Paylean) • Dietary additives • Cysteamine • Chromium • Betaine • Neuroleptics • Immunization against GnRF (Improvac) • Beta agonists (ractopamine, Paylean) • Orally active metabolic modifier

  4. Metabolic modifiers • Porcine somatotropin (pST, Reporcin) • Recombinant peptide hormone • Daily (or less frequent) injectable • Beta agonists (ractopamine, Paylean) • Orally active metabolic modifier

  5. Introduction Wray-Cahen et al. 1998

  6. Daily pST injections increases daily gain (data 16 farms across Australia) Dunshea 2005

  7. Daily pST injections decreases FCR (data 16 farms across Australia) Dunshea 2005

  8. MWF pST injections decreases FCR Hellams et al 2000

  9. Metabolic modifiers • Beta agonists (ractopamine, Paylean) • Orally active metabolic modifier

  10. Ractopamine increases daily gain (5 ppm for 14 d followed by 10 ppm for 17 d) Rikard-Bell et al. (2009a)

  11. Ractopamine decreases feed:gain (5 ppm for 14 d followed by 10 ppm for 17 d) Rikard-Bell et al. (2009a)

  12. Effect of feeding ractopamine for 4 weeks without or with daily pST for last 2 weeks on FCR Rikard-Bell et al. (2009b)

  13. Paylean for 4 weeks plus 4 pST injections over last 2 weeks decreases feed:gain Paylean for 4 weeks plus 4 pST injections over last 2 weeks decreases feed:gain van Barneveld et al. (2009)

  14. Introduction Wray-Cahen et al. 1998

  15. Introduction Cysteamine Wray-Cahen et al. 1998

  16. Cysteamine • Cysteamine hydrochloride (CSH) increases ST secretion in rats • Mechanism appears to be through inhibition of somatostatin (SRIF) secretion • Responses are not as pronounced as pST and may be transitory • Further work is required to optimise the dose and timing as high doses may blunt the response more rapidly through inhibition of gherelin

  17. Cysteamine at 70 ppm increases ADG

  18. Response to Cysteamine (70 ppm) is not as great as pST Dunshea 2007

  19. Cysteamine (70 ppm) and pST decrease fat Dunshea 2007

  20. Cysteamine • Cysteamine hydrochloride (CSH) increases ST secretion in rats • Mechanism appears to be through inhibition of somatostatin (SRIF) secretion • Responses are not as pronounced as pST and may be transitory • Further work is required to optimise the dose and timing as high doses may blunt the response more rapidly through inhibition of ghrelin

  21. Introduction Wray-Cahen et al. 1998

  22. GRF (GHRH) and other neonatal manipulations Gallagher 2000

  23. Neonatal treatment with pST can increase weaning weight and subsequent growth Dunshea (unpublished)

  24. Neonatal treatment with pST can increase slaughter and carcass weight Dunshea (unpublished)

  25. Introduction Chromium Wray-Cahen et al. 1998

  26. Chromium • Chromium is an essential element that improves insulin activity • The digestibility and availability of Cr is low and variable (0.5-2% for inorganic Cr and 10-25% for organic) • Responses to dietary Cr have been variable, possibly because of poor and variable digestibility

  27. Dietary Cr increases ADG but the response is variable (31 studies) Sales and Jancik 2011

  28. Nano- and micro- chromium • Chromium is an essential element that improves insulin activity • The digestibility and availability of Cr is low and variable (0.5-2% for inorganic Cr and 10-25% for organic) • Responses to dietary Cr have been variable, possibly because of poor and variable digestibility • Reducing the Cr particle size may improve responses

  29. Dietary Cr increases carcass weight Hung et al. 2011

  30. Dietary Cr reduces backfat in very lean pigs Hung et al. 2011

  31. Dietary nano CrPic increases the expression of muscle PI3K (an insulin signalling gene) Hung et al. 2011

  32. Betaine • Betaine is an osmoregulator that reduces maintenance energy requirements • Improved pigs can be limited by DE intake • Responses to metabolic modifiers may be limited by DE intake • Betaine may provide additional energy for protein deposition in pigs

  33. Betaine and pST have additive effects on daily gain in boars fed 80% ad libitum Betaine P=0.049 pST P<0.001 c c b a Suster et al. (2006)

  34. Betaine and xylanase have additive effects on daily gain in gilts fed 80% ad libitum (2.7 kg/d) Dunshea (unpublished)

  35. Dietary neuroleptics may improve growth of boars • Performance of group-housed entire males over the late finishing period is less than potential, possibly because of aggressive and sexual behaviours • Dietary neuroleptics (and immunization against GnRF) offer a means of reducing sexual and aggressive behaviours

  36. Dietary neuroleptics may increase carcass growth Dunshea et al. 2011

  37. Immunological castration (Improvac) • Physical castration of male pigs results in reduced feed efficiency and lean deposition and excess deposition of fat • Performance of group-housed entire males over the late finishing period is less than potential, possibly because of aggressive and sexual behaviours • Immunization against GnRF offers a means of reducing boar taint and negative behaviours and improving growth performance over that of both entire and physically castrated males

  38. Entire males deposit more lean than physically castrated barrows during finishing Entire Barrow Suster et al. (2006)

  39. Physically castrated barrows are fatter than entire males at 150 days of age Suster et al. (2006)

  40. Physically castrated barrows are less efficient than entire males (ca. 11%) from weaning to market

  41. I Smell Boar Taint!

  42. Sexual development in the boar Hypothalamus GnRF  boar taint & sexual & aggressive activities Pituitary  LH & FSH  steroids such as testosterone & androstenone Testes

  43. Immunization against GnRF (with Improvac) arrests/reverses sexual development in the boar Anti-GnRF Hypothalamus GnRF  boar taint & sexual & aggressive activities Pituitary  LH & FSH  steroids such as testosterone & androstenone Testes

  44. Immunocastration reduces testes size Primary Secondary Dunshea et al. (2001)

  45. Plasma testosterone declines rapidly and remains low for upto 8 weeks Dunshea et al. (2008)

  46. Fat androstenone declines rapidly and remains low for upto 8 weeks Dunshea et al. (2008)

  47. Castration and immunocastration eliminate boar taint Dunshea et al. (2001)

  48. Dunshea et al. (2011)

More Related