1 / 17

Montana Educator Performance Appraisal System

Montana Educator Performance Appraisal System. Presented by Steve York and Linda Vrooman Peterson Office of Public Instruction. The National Scene A Changing Landscape. Educator evaluation is to 2014 what NCLB was to 2004

henrik
Télécharger la présentation

Montana Educator Performance Appraisal System

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. MontanaEducator Performance Appraisal System Presented by Steve York and Linda Vrooman Peterson Office of Public Instruction Office of Public Instruction Denise Juneau, Superintendent

  2. The National SceneA Changing Landscape • Educator evaluation is to 2014 what NCLB was to 2004 • Indications from the Administration as well as Congress are that educator evaluation will play a large role in the reauthorization of ESEA • Waiver vs. Non Waiver States

  3. Evaluation Systems Work Group • Established in Administrative Rules of Montana (ARM)10.55.701(4) • Consists of representatives from the OPI, SAM, MTSBA, MSSA, MCDE, BPE, MEA-MFT, & MREA • Implementation – Pilot Year 2013-14 Office of Public Instruction Denise Juneau, Superintendent

  4. Core Beliefs • Targets Montana Values • Inspired by Danielson Model • Use of Montana state model is Voluntary • Lengthy, in-depth review of the “best of the best” in evaluation tools and models • Intended to Improve Instruction • Process is Goal Driven • Cost Effective • Adoptable and Adaptable • Other Models are Acceptable Office of Public Instruction Denise Juneau, Superintendent

  5. Evaluation Systems Work Group Core Purpose • Develop a model Montana system for evaluation of teachers and leaders that fosters continuous professional growth, enabling success for all students. Office of Public Instruction Denise Juneau, Superintendent

  6. Evaluation Systems Work Group Big Audacious Goal • By the fall of 2014, all Montana School Districts will use teacher and principal evaluation systems aligned to the accreditation standards assuring continuous education improvement. Office of Public Instruction, Denise Juneau, Superintendent

  7. District Options • Align local evaluation system to state standards ARM 10.55.701(4) • Adoptstate model as local evaluation system • Adaptstate model as local evaluation system • Implement a different evaluation model and demonstrate alignment to the state standards Office of Public Instruction Denise Juneau, Superintendent

  8. Important Points to Remember • Districts must meet the expectations of ARM 10.55.701(4)(a) • Districts are not required to use the state model - there is no intention to require districts to use the state model • State model for evaluation meets the expectations of the rule

  9. The Purpose of Montana State Model for Teacher Evaluation • Professional Development • Continuous Improvement • Quality Assurance

  10. The Structure of State Model • Domains • Components • Rubrics • Performance Indicators • Forms

  11. What is Being Evaluated? • Four Domains* in the State Model Framework for Teacher Evaluation: • Planning and Preparation • Learning Environment • Instructional Effectiveness for Student Learning • Professional Responsibilities *Based on The Charlotte Danielson Framework for Teaching, 2007 Office of Public Instruction Denise Juneau, Superintendent

  12. Process for Teacher Evaluation • Professional Responsibilities/Goal Setting • Observation Cycle/Formative Feedback • Summative Evaluation • Improvement Action Plan

  13. Technology • Forms are ready to use electronically • Teachscape Options • In District Options • Other Vendors

  14. What is Being Evaluated? Principal evaluation state model is based on the ISSLC Standards and modeled after Delaware’s Appraisal System Contains four main components: • Vision and Goals; • Culture of Learning; • Management; and • Professional Responsibilities

  15. Next Steps • Review and Revise state model based on pilot-year experience • Refine Rubrics for model Principal Evaluation • Develop model Superintendent Evaluation • Invitation to Join Cohort 2 for 2014-15 • Technical Assistance Available Office of Public Instruction, Denise Juneau, Superintendent

  16. District Alignment Process • Use 2013-14 to assure alignment to the state standards • Use the online form-filled document to demonstrate alignment of the local evaluation system to the state standards • Retain completed alignment form for local district records Office of Public Instruction Denise Juneau, Superintendent

  17. Contact Information Steve York, Assistant Superintendent syork@mt.gov Linda Vrooman Peterson, Division Administrator lvpeterson@mt.gov Montana-EPAS on OPI Web page http://opi.mt.gov/Programs/Accred/index.php?gpm=1_4 Regional Education Service Area Directors http://www.opi.mt.gov/Programs/Index.html?gpm=1_12 Office of Public Instruction Denise Juneau, Superintendent

More Related