1 / 1

R v Howe (1987) ------ R v Gotts (1992)

R v Howe (1987) ------ R v Gotts (1992). Howe was acting under duress, took part with others to 2 separate murders and on a 3 rd occasion the intended victim escaped. R v Howe set obiter dicta in 1987, which was that duress is not a defence for attempted or actual murder.

henry
Télécharger la présentation

R v Howe (1987) ------ R v Gotts (1992)

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. R v Howe (1987)------R v Gotts (1992) Howe was acting under duress, took part with others to 2 separate murders and on a 3rd occasion the intended victim escaped. R v Howe set obiter dicta in 1987, which was that duress is not a defence for attempted or actual murder. Gotts, aged 17, caused serious injury to his mother when he stabbed her, attempting to kill her. He claimed that his father was threatening to kill him if he didn’t follow his wishes. Therefore, he was claiming duress. However, the court followed the Howe obiter dicta statement and Gotts was found guilty. OBITER DICTA STATEMENT

More Related