1 / 22

The Problem: Obesity in America

The Problem: Obesity in America. Frank J. Domino, M.D. Barbara Olendzki, RD, MPH. World Wide Rates of overweight and obesity, 2000-2004. US 66.3% UK 63.0% Mexico 62.3% Canada 57.5% Greece 57.1% New Zealand 56.2% Germany 49.2% Italy 42.6%.

herbertdawson
Télécharger la présentation

The Problem: Obesity in America

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. The Problem: Obesity in America Frank J. Domino, M.D. Barbara Olendzki, RD, MPH

  2. World Wide Rates of overweight and obesity, 2000-2004 US 66.3% UK 63.0% Mexico 62.3% Canada 57.5% Greece 57.1% New Zealand 56.2% Germany 49.2% Italy 42.6%

  3. Consequences of Obesity 66% of Americans are overweight* 22% of Americans are obese Deaths from Obesity: 300,000 premature deaths associated with obesity annually (CDC) 25,000/month, 5,769/week, 821/day, 34/hour. 450,000 from tobacco-related disease 10.4 million people with type II diabetes 47 million with metabolic syndrome *CDC 2006

  4. Is treating obesity a way to save the economy? • 2003: 9.1 % of U.S. health expenditures* • Estimated annual medical spending due to overweight and obesity (BMI >25) to be as much as $92.6 billion in 2002 dollars* • 2006: 10% of U.S. expenditures** • $147 billion in 2006 dollars** • (Afghan war ~ 28 Billion per year over 8 Yrs) *Finkelstein EA; Health Affairs Web Exclusive. 2003; W3:219-226. **Finkelstein EA; Health Affairs 28, no. 5 (2009): w822-w831

  5. Obesity Trends* Among U.S. AdultsBRFSS, 1985 No Data <10% 10%–14% (*BMI ≥30, or ~ 30 lbs overweight for 5’ 4” person)

  6. Obesity Trends* Among U.S. AdultsBRFSS, 2007 (*BMI ≥30, or ~ 30 lbs. overweight for 5’ 4” person) No Data <10% 10%–14% 15%–19% 20%–24% 25%–29% ≥30%

  7. Obesity Trends* Among U.S. AdultsBRFSS, 2009 (*BMI ≥30, or ~ 30 lbs. overweight for 5’ 4” person) No Data <10% 10%–14% 15%–19% 20%–24% 25%–29% ≥30%

  8. Obesity Trends* Among U.S. AdultsBRFSS,1990, 1999, 2009 (*BMI 30, or about 30 lbs. overweight for 5’4” person) 1999 1990 2009 No Data <10% 10%–14% 15%–19% 20%–24% 25%–29% ≥30%

  9. State-specific Prevalence of Obesity* Among U.S. Adults, by Race/Ethnicity, 2006-2008 White non-Hispanic Black non-Hispanic Hispanic (*BMI 30)

  10. Summary • Non-Hispanic blacks, Hispanics, & non-Hispanic whites • For non-Hispanic blacks • Overall prevalence of obesity—35.7% • Midwest and South • Prevalence ranged from 23.0% (New Hampshire) to 45.1% (Maine) • 40 states had a prevalence of ≥ 30% • 5 states (Alabama, Maine, Mississippi, Ohio, and Oregon) had a prevalence of ≥ 40%

  11. Summary • For Hispanics • Overall prevalence of obesity—28.7% • Lower prevalence was observed in the Northeast • Prevalence ranged from 21.0% (Maryland) to 36.7% (Tennessee) • 11 states had a prevalence of ≥ 30% • For non-Hispanic whites • Overall prevalence of obesity—23.7% • Higher prevalence in the Midwest and South • Prevalence ranged from 9.0% (DC) to 30.2% (West Virginia) • Only one state (West Virginia) had a prevalence of ≥ 30% • 5 states (California, Colorado, Connecticut, Hawaii, and New Mexico) and DC had a prevalence of <20%

  12. What else has changed? Humans have a genotype that permits energy intake > expenditure Political decisions & industrialization of farms  growth of grain for livestock, rather than humans 1st in recorded history cost of meat < vegetables. ↑ portion sizes, ↑ fat intakes, sweetened beverages Lack of physical activity: ↓ Manual Labor, Computer/Screen time, increased automation allows for less activity @ home “What’s for Take Out?” 1.2 vs > 5.0 per week

  13. BAGEL 20 Years Ago Today 140 calories 3-inch diameter 350 calories 6-inch diameter If you rake the leaves for 50 minutes you will burn the extra 210 calories.* Calorie Difference: 210 calories 5 days/wk X 50 weeks=15.6 lb.

  14. CHEESEBURGER Today 20 Years Ago 333 calories 590 calories Calorie Difference: 257 calories If you lift weights for1 hour and 30 minutes,you will burn approximately 257 calories.*

  15. FRENCH FRIES You need to walk for1 hour and 10 minutes to burn approximately 400 extra calories 20 Years Ago Today 210 Calories 2.4 ounces 610 Calories 6.9 ounces Difference: 400 Calories

  16. The Solution:You and a little knowledge Frank J. Domino, M.D. Jill Grimes, M.D. Barbara Olendzki, RD, MPH

  17. Barriers to nutritional counseling Confusion over current guidelines Lack of time & compensation Effectiveness of interventions Confusion: nutrition as it relates to disease GOAL: 5 Brief Concepts to Recommend

  18. “Successful Losers” The National Weight Control Registry >5000 successful losers Members lost an average of 66 lbs (range=30-300 lbs) x 5.5 years (= 1 lb/month x 5 years) 78% eat breakfast every day. 75% weigh them self at least once a week. 62% watch < 10 hours of TV per week. 90% exercise, about 1 hour per day. http://www.nwcr.ws

  19. What about the average person?Daily Practices Survey 2004 US > 18 Yrs. “Successful Weight Loss Maintainers” Eat Fast Food < 2/Week > 5 Fruits & Vegetables/day ** AND 150 Minutes physical activity (25 Min/Day)

  20. What else can your Patients Do? 3200 Japanese, 30-69 Yrs Survey 2003-6 BMI, Eating “until full” & speed of eating Odds of Being Overweight Male Female Eating Till Full 2.00 1.84 Eating Quickly 1.84 2.09 Full & Quickly 3.13 3.21 Triple the odds !!! BMJ 2008: 337: a2002 Eat Slowly and question if still wants more

More Related