1 / 27

Offshore Wind Energy Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA) Phase 1 “Progress and Lessons”

Offshore Wind Energy Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA) Phase 1 “Progress and Lessons” Mark Jennison and Trevor Baker BMT Cordah Ltd. Presentation Overview. Introduction to SEA Phase 1 SEA Approach Process and Work Programme Detailed Methodology Findings to date Lessons Learnt.

hestia
Télécharger la présentation

Offshore Wind Energy Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA) Phase 1 “Progress and Lessons”

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Offshore Wind Energy Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA) Phase 1 “Progress and Lessons” Mark Jennison and Trevor Baker BMT Cordah Ltd.

  2. Presentation Overview • Introduction to SEA • Phase 1 SEA • Approach • Process and Work Programme • Detailed Methodology • Findings to date • Lessons Learnt

  3. Introduction to SEA Basic Features: • Tool/instrument to influence PPP processes by provision of ‘environmental’ information; • Earlier consideration of environmental issues (opportunities and risks); • Better link to national and global issues (greenhouse gases); • Identify preferred option from alternatives; • Acquisition of key baseline data; • Less resources and effort needed for EIAs; and • Provides the context for decisions on individual projects.

  4. SEA Approach Goal: • Provision of useful input to decision-making process Basic Guiding Principles: • Following ‘SEA’ Directive and draft ODPM guidance • Consideration of DTI SEA work for oil &gas activities • ‘Good’ international practice (IAIA, UN)

  5. SEA Approach ‘SEA’ Directive Key Features: • Plan and Programme Focus (not policy) • Implemented during preparation process (alternatives) • Scoping required to determine focus and content of Environmental Report (Directive includes biodiversity, health and cultural heritage) • Draft and Final Environmental Reports • Consultations on draft plan/programme and Reports (decision input) • Statement on use of Report in the decision

  6. Strategic Areas

  7. Phase 1 SEA Approach Process: • Establish SEA Steering Group • Establish SEA website as focus for awareness and consultation • Provide overview of baseline situation, trends, problems and causes • Scope key issues and impacts • Develop scenarios for impact prediction (No wind farms, most likely, maximum credible)

  8. Phase 1 SEA Approach Process: • Impact prediction and evaluation • Cumulative impact analysis

  9. Phase 1 SEA Approach Process: • Identification of mitigation and enhancement measures • Preferred option/scenario identified • Preparation of environmental management plan (mitigation and monitoring)

  10. Phase 1 SEA Approach Environmental Report: Information and advice pertaining to: • Absolute constraints • Relative constraints • Lowest level of constraint • Significance of environmental and socio-economic impacts from scenarios • Recommendations for environmental management framework

  11. Phase 1 SEA Approach Timetable: • Preparation of draft Environmental Report (To be issued at the end of April) • Consultation • Summary of consultation responses • Final document expected end of May

  12. Phase 1 SEA Approach Methodology and findings • data collation and review • quantitative data to GIS • constraints mapping • risk based impact analysis • scenario building

  13. Risk-based impact analysis • Consequence: effect of an activity’s interaction with the natural and socio-economic environments • Likelihood: probability that an activity will occur • Risk = consequence x likelihood

  14. Example assessment - noise Impact Likelihood Consequence Risk Seismic 5 3 15 (moderate) Construction* 5 1 5 (low) Operational * 5 3 15 (moderate) Decommissioning 3 5 15 (moderate) *Depends on type of noise and species

  15. Socio-economic environment

  16. Natural environment

  17. Spatial analysis

  18. Socio-economic environment

  19. Natural environment

  20. Constraints map - all data

  21. Scenario’s and time horizons • No development • Likely development • Maximum development • 2010 and 2020

  22. Scenarios likely max 2010 within 12nm 2500 4000 beyond 12nm 1500 3500 Total 4000 7500 % UK supply 4 8 2020 within 12nm 3700 5000 beyond 12nm 6500 12000 Total 10200 17000 % UK supply 10 17

  23. Maximum credible development, 2020

  24. Preliminary conclusions • Data gaps: baseline information on birds, elasmobranchs, squid, fishing, recreational navigation • Data gaps: impacts on birds, cetaceans, elasmobranchs, seascape • Number of constraints decline offshore

  25. Lessons learnt • Understanding of SEA, (not a ramped up EIA or a substitute for EIA) • Effectiveness of GIS • Difficulties in accessing data and information and in appropriate format • Mix between issue focus and impact focus • Stakeholder interests very wide ranging • Effective and appropriate consultation

  26. “It’s a start”

  27. www.og.dti.gov.uk/offshore-wind-sea/

More Related