1 / 8

Tension session I

Six Countries Programme on Innovation Kismarton-Ödenburg Conference „Crossing Borders – Venturing into the European Research Area“ Eisenstadt/Sopron, 30-31/10/03. Tension session I. Role of governance at European/national/regional level. Georg Panholzer

hewitt
Télécharger la présentation

Tension session I

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Six Countries Programme on Innovation Kismarton-Ödenburg Conference „Crossing Borders – Venturing into the European Research Area“ Eisenstadt/Sopron, 30-31/10/03 Tension session I Role of governance at European/national/regional level Georg Panholzer Austrian Federal Ministry for Economic Affairs and Labour Division for International Technology and Innovation Rapporteur:

  2. Tension session I - contributors • Stefan Kuhlmann, Fraunhofer Institute for Systems and Innovation Research (ISI), Karlsruhe, Germany • Patries Boekholt, Technopolis BV, Amsterdam, Netherlands • Chris Caswill, Economic and Social Research Council, UK

  3. Tension session I – Kuhlmann Potential futures • Scenario I:concentration and integration of European innovation policies in transnational arenas (major doubt: states not prepared to give away the lion´s share of public investment in innovation and research) • Scenario II:decentralisation and regionalisation of innovation policy arenas (most likely if existing centralized EU policy-making are overcharged, and lead to a system´s collapse!) • Scenario III: centrally „mediated“ mixture of competition and cooperation in integrated multilevel innovation policy arenas (=co-evolution of regional, national and European policy arenas towards an integration in multi-actor systems - co-ordination without giving away the lion´s share of power – probability depends on the „policy learning“ capabilities of major actors in the European innovation policy arena)

  4. Tension session I – Kuhlmann • There are positive signs that policy learning and co-operative evolution can take place, for example: • Vivid debate on „European Research Council“ as a sign, that scenario III is not too unrealisitc (evolutionary aspect: 2 years ago not even allowed to speak about; now: actor-driven approach (not primarily policy driven)

  5. Tension session I - Boekholt • Title: „The governance of ERA“ (functions of governance: agenda setting – prioization, referee, horizontal co-ordination – vertical steering, co-ordination of knowledge production) • ERA: so far successful as platform launching ideas and opening debate (including introduction of new governance mechanisms; ERA-Net, Benchmarking etc.) • Key role to play for member states (success?) • Co-ordination is key but how and by whom? • responsibility for research policy mainly at MS level • regions more „dissemination-oriented“ • linkages between ERA and Structural Funds hampered by many governance obstacles • Regions will have a bigger role to play if the „European Innovation Area“ to be targeted

  6. Tension session I – Caswill • „border crossings – knowing where the frontiers are“ • ERA in flux (national reorganizations, FP6, ERC-debate, enlargement, etc.) • what does it mean to cross the borders and what price has to be paid? • Borders have a purpose/can create problems • Where are the borders (between nations, cultures, sciences, institutions, science/society-democracy aspect) • Cónclusions for newcomers: get good maps&guides, learn from travellers/travel agents, look for opportunities for influence • Democratic govenance of borders is most important

  7. Tension session Idiscussion/results • Centralism vs. National independence • Particular value of ERA: idea of partnership (commission as a partner of MS) • Democracy aspect is very important ! • Evolution towards ERA not unlikely, but perhaps even response/necessity (growing pull of globalization – corporations are relativizing relationships with national research/innovation policies; innovation system/S&T-system has to respond - EUREKA as an important forerunne, but governed by national interests – partnership element too less developed • MS ready for ERA if national systems are not developed convincingly ?!

  8. Tension session I – discussion/results – II • Situations which foster the reshaping of governance (severe crisis or big carrot) • Policy co-ordination is a long term process (trust building needs time, strong political support necessary, WIN-WIN-Situations) • Evolution: no dictate possible – but softly-softly-waiting-approach might be not enough • Reward systems/incentives?? (maybe even „Maastricht+“?) • Many things that are now happening have been unthinkable a couple of ys. ago • Are we simply too impatient?

More Related