1 / 74

Cytotoxic T Lymphocytes

Cytotoxic T Lymphocytes. CTLs can kill virus-infected cells. Here, a CTL (arrow) is attacking and killing a much larger influenza virus-infected target cell. http://www.cellsalive.com/. Models of CTL Response. dT/dt = l – dT – kVT dT*/dt = kVT – d V T* - d E ET* dV/dt = pT* - cV

hfennell
Télécharger la présentation

Cytotoxic T Lymphocytes

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Cytotoxic T Lymphocytes CTLs can kill virus-infected cells. Here, a CTL (arrow) is attacking and killing a much larger influenza virus-infected target cell. http://www.cellsalive.com/

  2. Models of CTL Response dT/dt = l – dT – kVT dT*/dt = kVT – dVT* - dEET* dV/dt = pT* - cV dE/dt = kEET* - mE CTL Effectors Nowak and Bangham, Science272, 74 1996

  3. LCMV Infection LCMV Armstrong into BALB/c mice, Ahmed 1998

  4. Simple Model of CD8 Response DeBoer … Perelson, J Virol. 75,10663 (2001), J Immunol. 171, 3928 (2003)

  5. On-Off Model Activation function Ton = recruitment time A(0) = cells recruited

  6. Model Predictions

  7. Continuous Model

  8. Parameter Estimates

  9. Simulating CTL Response Low affinity clones sometimes dominate 10 response V Total CTL V □, ∆,◊ are 3 highest affinity clones

  10. Modeling the Kinetics of Hepatitis B and C Infections Alan S. Perelson, PhD Theoretical Biology & BiophysicsLos Alamos National LaboratoryLos Alamos, NM

  11. Viral Hepatitis - Overview Type of Hepatitis A B C D E Source of feces blood/ blood/ blood/ feces virus blood-derived blood-derived blood-derived body fluids body fluids body fluids Route of fecal-oral percutaneous percutaneous percutaneous fecal-oral transmission permucosal permucosal permucosal Chronic no yes yes yes no infection Prevention pre/post- pre/post- blood donor pre/post- ensure safe exposure exposure screening; exposure drinking immunization immunization risk behavior immunization; water modification risk behavior modification

  12. Estimates of Acute and Chronic DiseaseBurden for Viral Hepatitis, United States HAV HBV HCV HDV Acute infections (x 1000)/year* 125-200 140-320 35-180 6-13 Fulminant deaths/year 100 150 ? 35 Chronic 0 1-1.25 3.5 infections million million 70,000 Chronic liver disease deaths/year 0 5,000 8-10,000 1,000 * Range based on estimated annual incidence, 1984-1994.

  13. Hepatitis B and C Virus • HBV is a DNA virus • Genome is very small, ~ 3.2kb, • Takes the form of a partially closed circle • Vaccine; therapy to control not cure • HCV is a positive strand RNA virus • Genome is about 9.3kb, approximately the same size as HIV • No vaccine; therapy successful in 50% of people treated

  14. 0 7 14 0.5 0 5MU 10MU -0.5 15MU -1 -1.5 -2 -2.5 -3 Mean Decrease in HCV RNA Levels Over First 14 Days of QD IFN- Treatment Days HCV Genotype 1 Mean Decrease HCV RNA(Log10 Copies/mL) Lam N. DDW. 1998 (abstract L0346).

  15. Model of HCV Infection b Infection Rate pVirions/d I T Infected Cell Target Cell c d Loss Clearance

  16. What if IFN blocks infection? IFN b p virions/d I T Infected Cell Target cell d c death clearance

  17. What if IFN Blocks Production? b IFN p Virions/d I T Infected Cell e Effectiveness Target Cell c d Death/Loss Clearance

  18. What if IFN blocks production? • If IFN treatment totally blocks virus production, then • dV/dt = - cV => V(t)=V0 e- c t • Viral load should fall exponentially with slope c. However, data shows an acute exponential fall followed by slower fall.

  19. IFN Effectiveness in Blocking Production • Let e = effectiveness of IFN in blocking production of virus • e= 1 is 100% effectiveness • e= 0 is 0% effectiveness • dV/dt = (1 – e)pI – cV

  20. Early Kinetic Analysis • Before therapy, assume steady state so that pI0 =cV0. Also, assume at short times, I=constant=I0, so that dV/dt= (1-e)cV0 - cV • Model predicts that after therapy is initiated, the viral load will initially change according to: V(t) = V0[1 – e + eexp(-ct)] • This equation can be fit to data and cand e estimated. • Thus drug effectiveness can be determined within the first few days!

  21. 8 7 6 5 0 1 2 10MU Log10 HCV RNA/mL Days

  22. Viral Kinetics of HCV Genotype 1 5MU 10MU 15MU Drug Efficacy 81 ± 4% 95 ± 4% 96 ± 4% Viral Clearance Constant (1/d) 6.2 ± 0.8 6.3 ± 2.4 6.1 ± 1.9 Half-life ofVirions(Hours) 2.7 2.6 2.7 Production& Clearance Rates(1012 Virions/d) 0.4 ± 0.2 2.3 ± 4 0.6 ± 0.8

  23. Standard Model of HCV Dynamics Equations Parameters l Supply of target cells dNet loss rate of target cells β Infectivity rate constant d Infected cell death rate e Drug efficacy p Virion production rate c Virion clearance rate constant Variables Initial Conditions T Target Cell Density I Infected Cell Density V Virus Concentration T(0) = T0 I (0) = I0 V(0) = V0

  24. Solution: Change in Viral Load • Assuming T = constant, • When c>>δ, λ1≈ c andλ2≈ εδ where t0 = delay between treatment commencement and onset of effect

  25. 8 7 6 5 4 0 7 14 10MU Log10 HCV RNA/mL Days

  26. Current Therapy: Peg-IFN a2b + RBV Peg-IFN given once a week Major Point: Drug Pharmacokinetics Matters!

  27. Pegylated Interferon (Peg-IFN) • 21 HIV HCV Co-Infected Patients (A. Talal) • Dosing • 1.5 μg/kg Peg-IFN a-2b (12 kDa) weekly • 1000 or 1200 mg ribavirin daily Talal et al., Hepatology (2006)

  28. HCV RNA and PEG-IFN α-2bTalal et al., Hepatol. (2006) PEG HCV

  29. Pharmacodynamics Emax Model Drug concentration, C(t), affects efficacy n = Hill coefficient, EC50 = 50% effective conc. t = delay between receptor binding and effect

  30. PK Model for Absorption & Elimination of Peg-IFN ka ke • Amount of drug in blood (A), Concentration = A/Vd • X = amount of drug remaining at absorption site • F = bioavailability • D = dose • ka = absorption rate constant • ke = elimination rate constant Absorption Site Blood absorption elimination

  31. Following a single dose

  32. PK Model • Following multiple doses, • t= dosing interval and N = # of doses • Vd = volume of distribution

  33. PK ModelDrug Concentrations

  34. Drug Efficacy Profile

  35. Fit of Model to PEG-IFN α-2b Conc. and HCV RNA Data

  36. Difference between responders and nonrespondersTalal et al., Hepatol. (2006) • Average drug conc. - Not different • Median EC50 10-fold lower in SVR (0.04 mg/L) than NR (0.45 mg/L), P=0.014 • Median efficacy – higher in responders 0.92 vs 0.45 (P=0.02) • Median drug conc./EC50 – higher in responders 10.1 vs 1.0 (P=0.012)

  37. Conclusions • HCV kinetic models can be used to quantitatively estimate the effectiveness of different drug regimes, and help establish appropriating dosing. • They can give quantitative insights into biology of viral infection – rates of virion production, clearance, cell loss, etc. • When using peg-IFN a2b drug effectiveness can change during the dosing interval and models need to be modified to take this into consideration.

  38. Viral dynamics and immune responses in acute hepatitis B infection Stanca M. Ciupe, Ruy M. Ribeiro, Patrick W. Nelson, Alan S. Perelson

  39. Patient data(Webster, Lancet 2000; Whalley, Hepatol. 2000) • HBV outbreak was identified in the UK in 1998 due to autohemotherapy • Serological exposure to the same HBV variant in 57 patients. • 7 identified in the preclinical phase and studied here.

  40. Biphasic decay of viral load • First phase - span 56 days; • - half life 3.4 days; • Second phase - span 148 days; • - half life 23 days;

  41. Models A number of models of HBV infection exist: Nowak & Thomas, PNAS 1996; Tsiang et al Hepatol., 1999; Levin et al Hepatol. 2001; Murray & Chisari, PNAS 2005. With exception of Murray & Chisari (2005) they were developed to analyze drug therapy and are missing a number of key features of HBV infection that are important during acute infection.

  42. Viral Lifecycle

  43. Model continued • Here we will consider that almost 100% of hepatocytes are thought be infected at the peak of the infection. Due to this both cytolytic and non-cytolytic mechanisms may be needed to clear the infection. • Further, a large amount of hepatocyte proliferation accompanies viral and cccDNA clearance in animal models (woodchuck, duck and chimpanzee) and presumably in human infection. • Key Question: As virus is cleared and uninfected hepatocytes replace infected ones, what prevents infection of these newly generated hepatocytes?

  44. Model Cytolytic death E V k Virus production virus infection 1 cccDNA c cccDNA dilution T cure z cccDNA clearance Virus production E activation cure E s ≥2 cccDNA R E effectors E refractory Cytolytic death Cytolytic death

  45. Model equations

  46. Parameter fitting • Assumptions: some parameter values fixed based on literature (McDonald, Tsiang, Hep. 1999, Lau, Hep. 2000, Lewin, Hep. 2001, Ahmed, Science 1996) - initial conditions (Whalley JEM 2001); • incubation time:80-140 days (Bertoletti, Hep. 2003);

  47. Others we estimate by Monte Carlo search • Fitness function: • Search within a predefined range for parameters; • Once a good fit is found, search locally.

  48. Model gives biphasic decay of viral load Best fit of model to data Patient 7 is the only patient not to clear HBV

  49. ALT and Effector cells hepatocytes ALT E ALT ALT=alanine aminotransferase

More Related