280 likes | 294 Vues
‘Behind the scenes at the BBFC’. AS/A Level Film Studies Conference University of Hull 6 th February 2008 Ian Mashiah – Film, Video and Video Games Examiner. Today’s Presentation. Who we are What we do Why we do it How we do it How you can find out more It’s showtime… Any questions?.
E N D
‘Behind the scenes at the BBFC’ AS/A Level Film Studies Conference University of Hull 6th February 2008 Ian Mashiah – Film, Video and Video Games Examiner
Today’s Presentation • Who we are • What we do • Why we do it • How we do it • How you can find out more • It’s showtime… • Any questions?
Just a reminder… Suitable for 15 years+ Universal. Suitable for all Suitable for 12 years+. No one younger than 12 can see a 12A film unless accompanied by an adult Suitable for Adults only Parental Guidance. General Viewing but some scenes may be unsuitable for young children
What is the BBFC? • Designated body for the regulation of film and video • Established 1912 • Independent, non-governmental body funded through charged fees • Classifies Films on behalf of Local Authorities – the Cinemas Act, 1985 • Classifies Videos, DVDs and some Digital Games under the Video Recordings Act, 1984
Some Facts • In 2007, the BBFC classified: • 574 films • 222 of these were passed 15 • 11778 Videos & DVDs • 4938 of these were passed U or PG • 258 Digital Games • 151 of these were passed 15 or 18 • 2187 Trailers and Ads • 1103 of these were for cinema release • In 2007, the BBFC rejected only TWO works
This was then… 1916 1. Indecorous, ambiguous and irreverent titles and subtitles2. Cruelty to animals 3. The irreverent treatment of sacred subjects 4. Drunken scenes carried to T.P. O’Connor’s ‘Forty-Three Grounds for Deletion’ ‘Unnecessary exhibition of under-clothing’ ‘Men and women in bed together’ ‘Excessively passionate love scenes’ ‘Cruelty to animals’ ‘Materialization of the conventional figure of Christ’ ‘The modus operandi of criminals’ ‘The exhibition of profuse bleeding’ ‘The drug habit. e.g. opium, morphia, cocaine, etc’ ‘Scenes tending to disparage public characters and institutions’
Overriding Principles now Censorship through classification Works should be allowed to reach the widest audience that is appropriate for their theme and treatment The context in which something (eg sex and violence) is presented is central to the question of its acceptability Decisions are based on published and regularly updated guidelines – based on public consultation Adults should be free to pick their own entertainment within the law
Legislation The Licensing Act, 2003: • Cinemas require a licence • The BBFC classifies on behalf of Local Authoritiesbut they can: • ignore BBFC certificates • grant their own certificates • effectively ‘ban’ Films
The Video Recordings Act, 1984 • ‘Video Nasties’ – the moral panic • Criminal Justice & Public Order Act, 1994 • the ‘Harm’ test • Digital Media
Other Legislation… • The Obscene Publications Act, 1959 & 1964 • Cinematograph Films (Animals) Act, 1937 • Protection of Children Act, 1978 • Race Relations Act, 1976 • Human Rights Act, 1998 • Blasphemous Libel
Accountability • Guidelines: February 2005 • Public Consultation • Citizens Juries • Research • Questionnaires • Research Projects
31 Full-Time/Part-Time Examiners 8 Specialist Video Games Examiners Cantonese/South Asian Language Examiners Various backgrounds 4 Senior Examiners 4 Teams The Examiners THE CLASSIFICATION PROCESS
Examining Examiner Duties • Viewing • Examiners’ Meeting • Team Projects • Networking • Correspondence
The Examining Process • Viewing in pairs (with exceptions) • Over 5.5 Hours per day • Random • Examiner’s Log • Post viewing discussion linked to: • Guidelines • Policy • Legal Restrictions • Decision Agreed upon… • Consumer Advice written • Reports Filed • Reports Checked
Examining: Issues • Violence • Language • Sex • Sexual References • Sexual Violence • Drugs • Criminal Activity • Weapons • Imitable Techniques • Horror • Theme
Other Considerations • the work – its story, style, treatment • the audience – address and appeal • the moral framework • artistic or educational merit • potential level of offensiveness • precedent • possible harm • context
Other Outcomes • Split Decision • Confirmatory Viewing • Cuts- legal reasons- policy- ‘category cuts’ • Rejection
Cuts: Examples • Imitable Techniques: violent, criminal, harmful • Glamorisation of Offensive Weapons • Sexual Violence: eroticised rape or sexual assault • Illegal Material • Instruction in Drug Use
Most works fit into one category… Suitable for 15 years+ Universal. Suitable for all Suitable for 12 years+. No one younger than 12 can see a 12A film unless accompanied by an adult Suitable for Adults only Parental Guidance. General Viewing but some scenes may be unsuitable for young children
But some works are borderline • A borderline work is one for which there are strong arguments for two categories, or one category and cuts • BBFC Guidelines state: “Occasionally a work lies on the margin between two categories. In applying the criteria in these Guidelines in such a case, the BBFC takes into account the intentions of the film-maker, the expectations of the public in general and the work’s audience in particular, and any special merits of the work”
Education www.sbbfc.co.uk Launched May 2005 www.cbbfc.co.uk Launched June 2003
sbbfc: Who’s it for? • Media & Film Studies Students and Teachers (GCSE, AS/A and beyond) • ‘Informational’ • Further Expansion: Teacher/Student Consultation
sbbfc: the Student Guide • History, Legislation, Classification • Resources • Timelines • Case Studies • Research • Articles • Downloads • News • Reading List • Web Links
sbbfc: for Teachers • Seminars • External Presentations • Downloads • BBFC posters • Feedback
Education You Call the Shots. www.parentsbbfc.co.uk
Thank You… www.sbbfc.co.uk