1 / 31

Electroweak Physics and Higgs Searches with 1fb -1 at the Tevatron Collider

This talk presents the latest results from the Tevatron Collider regarding Electroweak Physics and the search for the Higgs boson. It covers precision physics with W and Z bosons, studies the structure of the theory, and explores new physics with anomalous couplings. The talk also discusses the measurement of W mass and the search for di-boson events. The results are compared with the Standard Model predictions and potential evidence for new physics is examined.

hicksthomas
Télécharger la présentation

Electroweak Physics and Higgs Searches with 1fb -1 at the Tevatron Collider

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Electroweak Physics and Higgs Searches with 1fb-1 at the Tevatron Collider Gerald C. Blazey NICADD/Northern Illinois University (for the CDF and DZero Collaborations) APS 2007 April Meeting April 16, 2007

  2. Talk Outline Context Electroweak Physics Z Production Di-Bosons W mass Standard Model Higgs Indirect Constraints Direct Searches Low Mass High Mass Conclusions Thanks to Gregorio Bernardi, Jan Stark, Oliver Stelzer-Chilton, Julien Donini, Wade Fisher, Krisztian Peters, Ashutosh Kotwal, & Martin Gruenwald for plots and figures

  3. (Select) Electroweak Physics at the Tevatron • Precision physics with Ws & Zs: • Tests of higher order calculations • Constrain PDFs • Properties of the boson: W mass • Completing the spectrum of di-boson cross sections • Study the structure of the theory • Backgrounds to Higgs, top, SUSY • Probe new physics w/ anomalous couplings

  4. EW Symmetry Breaking The Higgs • To explain quark, lepton, and gauge boson mass, the symmetry of the EW theory must be broken. • The simplest model for symmetry breaking involves the addition of a doublet of complex scalar fields. • These fundamental Higgs scalar fields acquire non-zero vacuum expectation values when symmetry breaks down • Three d.o.f “give their mass” to the W+, W-,Z • The remaining d.o.f corresponds to a fundamental scalar or the Higgs boson • Fermions gain mass by interacting with the Higgs fields • The observation of the single massive scalar would be the smoking gun! • There are indirect limits on the mass of the Higgs and a number of direct searches for the particle. • More complex models for symmetry breaking will be covered in the next talk by Ulrich Heintz, BU.

  5. Electrons ET > ~ 20 GeV Shower Shapes Isolation |h| coverage CDF: 0-2.5 DZero: 0-3.2 Photons ET > ~ 7 GeV Shower Shapes Lepton Isolation |h| coverage CDF: 0-1.1 DZero: 0-2.5 Muons pT > ~ 20 GeV Isolation |h| coverage CDF: 0-2 DZero: 0-2 Neutrinos Missing ET > ~ 20GeV Angular Isolation *Tight and loose selections are employed to improve efficiency or rejection as needed Basic* Event Characteristics

  6. Z rapidity related to parton momentum fractions by Acceptance at large rapidities opens full range of parton x σTot = 265.9±1.0±1.1 pb NNLO w/ NLO CTEQ6.1 most consistent with data Ze+e- Rapidity

  7. Ze+e- Transverse Momentum • Tests higher order descriptions of Z PT • Reduces uncertainty on W mass by improving modeling of ET. • Improves understanding of backgrounds for new phenomena searches Resbos +Photos 1fb-1

  8. Sensitive to Wg coupling Variation in Wg production would be sign of new physics Particularly changes in PT(g) spectrum at high MT(Wg) Wg Production • DØ preliminary MT(lgn) > 90 GeV m channel: s( mn g X) = 3.21 +/- 0.52 pb e channel: s( e n g X) = 3.12 +/- 0.42 pb theory: s( l n g X) = 3.21 +/- 0.08 pb • CDF preliminary 30 < MT(mn) < 120 GeV: • e+m channel: s( l n g X) = 18.03+/- 2.83 pb theory: s( m n g X)= 19.3 +/- 1.4 pb Measured Cross Sections and g spectra in good agreement with SM.

  9. Wg: Radiation Zero • SM couplings at LO produce amplitude zero in the center-of-mass production angle • Correlations lead to a dip in Q*(hg-hl)= Q*Dh • Discrimination against anomalous coupling evident! Background-subtracted data Q*Dh

  10. Sensitive to WWZ vertex SM NNL cross section: 3.7 +/- 0.3 pb WZ lnl+l- mode Main Backgrounds: Z*/g+jet, ZZ, DY Z Z Z s(WZ)Observation 16 observed 12.5 expected 2.7 background 6.0s 12 observed 7.5 expected 3.6 background 3.3s CDF: 5.0 +1.8-1.6 pb DZero: 4.0 +1.9 -1.5 pb

  11. No self coupling of Z bosons in the standard model. Produced in t channel SM s: 1.4 +/- 0.1pb Strategies ZZ  4 charged leptons Very clean signatures Low background from Z+j Small BF ZZ  2 charged leptons+ 2 neutrinos Six times production High Background WW, DY Event Likelihood using WW, ZZ Matrix elments s(ZZ) Evidence DZero eemm event • DZero 4 lepton (1.0 fb-1) • Observed: 1 Event • Signal: 1.71 +/- 0.10 • Background: 0.17 +/- 0.04 • CDF 4 lepton (1.4 fb-1) • Observed: 1 Event • Signal: 2.54 +/- 0.15 • Background: 0.03 +/- 0.02 • 2.2s significance

  12. s(ZZ) Adding the ll+nn Channel • Signal Extraction: • Calculate LO event probability or LRatio= P(ZZ)/(P(ZZ)+P(WW)) • Fit to extract signal • 1.9 s significance • Combination with 4l • Use binned-likelihood • 3.0 s combined significance

  13. EW Single Top 4.9+/-1.4 pb Evidence(3s) Observation(5s) ? Boson and Di-boson Status

  14. CDF for ~200pb-1 (Feb’02-Sep’03) Event Requirements One selected lepton Electron cluster ET > 30 GeV, track pT > 18 GeV Muon track pT > 30 GeV Hadronic Recoil < 15 GeV pT(n) > 30 GeV Derive mass directly from EW quantities Radiative corrections are dominated by t, H loops: W mass indirect measures of Higgs mass. Run II W Mass

  15. Results: Data, Fits, & Systematics Transverse Mass Fits Basic Technique: Fit e, m transverse mass, momentum, & missing energy to Monte Carlo templates to extract mass Combined fits 3 e: 80477+/- 62 MeV 3 m: 80352+/- 60 MeV All: 80413+/- 48 MeV Electron Transverse Mass mT(en)

  16. Best Single Measurement! New Tevatron Average: 80428+/- 39 MeV New World Average: 80398 +/- 25 MeV

  17. Constraints on Higgs Mass • Direct e+e-HZ LEP search mH>114.4 GeV @ 95% C.L. • New Winter 2007 EW fits including new mW and mtop measurements: mH=76+33-25 GeV mH<144 GeV @ 95% C.L. • Combination of the EW fit and LEP2 limit: mH<182 GeV @ 95% C.L. See previous talk by Kevin Lannon, OSU for new results on top mass Mt=170.9+/-1.8 GeV

  18. 68 % C.L. mW (GeV) mt (GeV) We’re looking for a light Higgs!

  19. Excluded Tevatron Searches: SM Higgs Production and Decay pb • Mass Dependent Strategy • MH<135 GeV • gg  H  bb overwhelmed by huge multi-jet (QCD) background. • Use leptons from associated W and Z production along with Hbb decay to “tag” event • Complement with HWW* • Backgrounds: Wbb, Zbb, W/Zjj, top, diboson, QCD… • MH>135 GeV • gg  H  WW production • Multi-lepton final states distinctive. • Background: WW, DY, WZ, ZZ, tt, tW, tt.. BF 80GeV 200GeV

  20. Combined Tevatron Higgs Limits(Summer 2006) • Sixteen mutually exclusive final states for WH, ZH, WW • Observed combined limits: • A factor of 10.4 above SM at mH=115 GeV • A factor of 3.8 above SM at mH=160 GeV • Recent progress • Both CDF & DZero completed low & high mass 1fb-1 analyses. • Improvements in analysis techniques & systematic uncertainties.

  21. Associated Higgs Production Experimental Signature • Leptonic decay of W/Z bosons provides “handle” for event • Higgs decay to two bottom-quarks helps reduce SM backgrounds

  22. WHl nbb, l =e,m • CDF/DØ box cut analyses • isolated e or m • missing ET • jets>15 GeV (CDF)/20 GeV (DØ) • Backgrounds: Wbb, top, di-boson, QCD • Analyzed one “tight” b-tag and 2 “loose” b-tag channels, later combined • Cross section limits are derived from invariant mass distributions • 95% CL upper limits (pb) for mH=115 GeV (SM expected: 0.13 pb) • CDF: 3.4 (2.2) observed (expected) • DØ: 1.3 (1.1) observed (expected) Best Expected: sexcl/sSM=9

  23. New Technique: WHl nbb, l =e,m • Use LO ME to compute event probability densities for signal and background • Selection criteria based on single top search (will be optimized in the future) • Cross section limits are derived from the discriminant distributions • 95% CL upper limit for mH=115 GeV is 1.7(1.2) pb observed (expected) • Similar sensitivity to cut-based analysis, with optimization ~30% increase in sensitivity.

  24. Selection: ee or mm with dilepton mass ~ MZ opposite charge and isolated from jets Jets > 15 GeV (DØ), > 25(15) GeV (CDF) Dominant backgrounds: Z+jets (Zbb irreducible), top, WZ, ZZ, QCD multijet DØ: Require at least two b-tagged jets. Cross section limit derived from dijet invariant mass distribution within a search window CDF: Require 1 b-tagged jet. 2-D Neural Network to discriminate against the two largest backgrounds (tt vs. ZH and Z+jets vs. ZH) Limits derived from the neural network distribution 95% CL upper limits (pb) for mH=115 GeV (SM expected: 0.08 pb) DØ: 2.7 (2.8) observed (expected) CDF: 2.2 (1.9) observed (expected) ZHl l bb, l =e,m Mjj(GeV) Best Expected: sexcl/sSM=24

  25. New: ZHl l bb, l =e,m using NN2 • Loosen Event Selection • NN One: • Improves jet resolution • Assign missing Et to jets based on position and azimuthal separation • NN Two: • Train on single tags and double tags • Two dimensional • ZH+ Zjet • ZH+ Top-antitop Expected: sexcl/sSM= 16

  26. ZHnnbb, WHl nbb • Selection: • Separate analysis for 1 and 2 b-tag sample • Exactly Two Jets • Large missing ET , not aligned in f with jets • Backgrounds: • Physics: Z/W+jets, top • Instrumental: mis-measured ET together with QCD jets • At 115 GeV: Best Expected: sexcl/sSM=10 2tags

  27. HWW*l +l - nn • Search strategy: • 2 high pT isolated, opposite signed leptons • Require missing ET , veto near jets • Choose di-lepton opening angle Dfll to discriminate against dominant WW background • WW comes from spin-0 Higgs & leptons prefer to point in the same direction • Sensitivity at mH ~ 160 GeV: Best Expected: sexcl/sSM=4

  28. New: HWW*l +l –nn • Event Selection • Exactly 2 Leptons • Lepton Isolation • Missing Et • Less than 2 jets (>15 GeV) • Limit Extraction: • Using ME calculate P(H)/(P(H)+kiBi) • Perform binned maximum likelihood fit over discriminator • At 160 GeV s<1.3pb at 95% C.L. • An additional NN analysis just approved has similar sensitivity Expected: sexcl/sSM= 5

  29. and select observed CDF measurements Three analyses! HWW Updated DZero Combined Higgs Limits • Single Experiment Limit competitive or better than 2006 combination • Observed combined limits: • At mH=115 GeV a factor of 8.4 (5.9 expected) above SM • At mH=160 GeV afactor of 3.7 (4.2 expected) above SM

  30. Final Comments & Conclusions • EW • Precision studies continue • Nearly completed the di-boson spectrum • Improved techniques/backgrounds for Higgs Search • Higgs • EW fits + LEP: mH<182 GeV @ 95% C.L. • Closing in on exclusion near 160 GeV! • Prospects • Steady progress on improved techniques, sensitivity & limits • New combined Tevatron limit this summer.

  31. Accelerator Higgs top

More Related