Best Practices in Clinical Audit: Ensuring Effective Preparation, Measurement, and Change Implementation
This presentation outlines the essential criteria and indicators necessary for conducting high-quality clinical audits. It covers the four key stages of the clinical audit cycle: Preparation & Planning, Measuring Performance, Implementing Change, and Sustaining Improvement. Important criteria are introduced for each stage, emphasizing stakeholder engagement, evidence-based standards, robust data collection, and effective communication of results. Engaging both clinical and non-clinical stakeholders, including patients, is crucial for identifying priorities and implementing recommendations for improvement.
Best Practices in Clinical Audit: Ensuring Effective Preparation, Measurement, and Change Implementation
E N D
Presentation Transcript
Introduction for speaker only • Please see speaker notes below for details of format of this presentation and suggestions on how it might be used
Stages of clinical audit cycle • Stage 1 – Preparation & planning • Stage 2 – Measuring performance • Stage 3 - Implementing change • Stage 4 – Sustaining improvement (including re-audit)
Stage 1 Preparation and Planning • Criterion 1 • The topic for the clinical audit is a priority • Indicators • 1.1 Topic reflects a local service, specialty or national priority where care could be improved or refined through clinical audit • 1.2 Key stakeholders, clinical and non-clinical, agree that topic is a priority
Stage 1 Preparation and planning • Criterion 2 • The clinical audit measures against standards • Indicators • 2.1 Standards are based on best available evidence • 2.2 Standards are referenced to source and link provided • 2.3 Standards are agreed by clinical audit team, clinicians and patients • 2.4 Standards are expressed in a form that enables measurement
Stage 1 Preparation and planning • Criterion 3 • The organisation enables the conduct of clinical audit • Indicators • 3.1 Written plan describes structures and processes to support clinical audit • 3.2 Staff have time to participate • 3.3 Organisation provides administrative and practical support • 3.4 Necessary training is identified and provided • 3.5 Financial costs are identified and met
Stage 1 Preparation and planning • Criterion 4 • The clinical audit engages with clinical and non-clinical stakeholders • Indicators • 4.1 All clinical disciplines relevant to audit topic should be involved • 4.2 Senior clinicians show commitment and provide leadership • 4.3 Ownership of clinical audit findings at most senior level where there is power to implement change • 4.4 Stakeholder roles and accountabilities are clearly defined • 4.5 Stakeholders are involved from beginning to end • 4.6 Active communication is maintained throughout the process
Stage 1 Preparation and planning • Criterion 5 • Patients or their representatives are involved in the clinical audit if appropriate • Indicators • 5.1 Patient group to whom standards apply is clearly defined • 5.2 Standards include patient priorities and patient-defined outcomes • 5.3 Patients/carers are recognised as key stakeholders • 5.4 Patient members of clinical audit team are fully informed about what is expected of them.... • 5.5 .....and are given basic training as necessary • 5.6 Patients are kept informed about timescales, progress, results and actions
Stages of clinical audit cycle • Stage 1 – Preparation & planning • Stage 2 – Measuring performance • Stage 3 - Implementing change • Stage 4 – Sustaining improvement (including re-audit)
Stage 2 Measuring performance • Criterion 6 • Clinical audit method is described in written protocol • Indicators • 6.1 Timetable for clinical audit is described including completion and re-audit • 6.2 Protocol describes methodology & data collection process in detail • 6.3 Consideration given to ethics, confidentiality & consent and Caldicott principles applied • 6.4 Methods are recorded so that re-audit can be undertaken
Stage 2 Measuring performance • Criterion 7 • Target sample should be appropriate to generate meaningful results • Indicators • 7.1 method of sampling best suited to measuring performance against standards and scientifically reliable • 7.2 sample size sufficient to generate meaningful results • 7.3 sample allows for adjustment for case mix
Stage 2 Measuring performance • Criterion 8 • Data collection process is robust • Indicators • 8.1 clinical audit utilises pre-existing data sets where possible • 8.2 data collection tool and process have been validated • 8.3 data collection process aims to ensure complete data capture
Stage 2 Measuring performance • Criterion 9 • Data analysed & results reported in way that maximises impact of clinical audit • Indicators • 9.1 data analysed & feedback of results given within agreed timescale to maintain momentum • 9.2 results presented appropriately for each audience to ensure that they stimulate & support action planning • 9.3 results are communicated effectively to all key stakeholders including patients
Stages of clinical audit cycle • Stage 1 – Preparation & planning • Stage 2 – Measuring performance • Stage 3 - Implementing change • Stage 4 – Sustaining improvement (including re-audit)
Stage 3 Implementing change • Criterion 10 • Action plan is developed and implemented to take forward any recommendations made • Indicators • 10.1 plan to include both areas needing attention & those with good compliance • 10.2 plan to have agreement of stakeholders including patients • 10.3 plan highlights who is responsible for each action with timescales • 10.4 plan identifies financial/resource implications • 10.5 results & action plan is communicated widely • 10.6 implementation is closely monitored and progress regularly communicated
Stages of clinical audit cycle • Stage 1 – Preparation & planning • Stage 2 – Measuring performance • Stage 3 - Implementing change • Stage 4 – Sustaining improvement (including re-audit)
Stage 4 Sustaining improvement • Criterion 11 • Clinical audit is cyclical process that demonstrates that improvement has been achieved & sustained • Indicators • 11.1 topic is re-audited to complete clinical audit cycle • 11.2 where recommended action is not achieved topic is re-audited at agreed intervals • 11.3 results of re-audit are recorded and disseminated appropriately including to patients
Contact us Healthcare Quality Improvement Partnership Email - lqit@hqip.org.uk Website - www.hqip.org.uk Promoting quality improvement for better healthcare