1 / 17

Black hole accretion and host galaxies of obscured quasars

Black hole accretion and host galaxies of obscured quasars. Vincenzo Mainieri . with. Angela Bongiorno, Andrea Merloni & COSMOS. Introduction. AGN-galaxies co-evolution.

hidi
Télécharger la présentation

Black hole accretion and host galaxies of obscured quasars

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Black hole accretion and host galaxies of obscured quasars Vincenzo Mainieri with Angela Bongiorno, Andrea Merloni & COSMOS

  2. Introduction AGN-galaxies co-evolution M-  relation: AGN and galaxies co-evolve (Magorrian et al. 1998; Gebhardt et al. 2000; Ferrarese & Merrit 2000; Tremaine et al. 2002) Hopkins+08 Hickox+09 Vincenzo Mainieri (ESO) QSO-2 and their host galaxies The X-ray Universe 2011

  3. Introduction AGN-galaxies co-evolution Where the “food” is coming from? Secular processes Major mergers Vincenzo Mainieri (ESO) QSO-2 and their host galaxies The X-ray Universe 2011

  4. QSO-2 sample Sample selection Sample selection Selection criteria: LX>1044 erg s-1 NH>1022 cm-2 142 QSO-2 The galaxy to AGN contrast ratio is maximized: “easier” to study the morphology of the host as well as its stellar mass and SFR. Caveat: UV light can be contaminated from scattered AGN light, SFR diagnostics (e.g. H, [OII]) excited by accretion power rather than young stars, etc.. Vincenzo Mainieri (ESO) QSO-2 and their host galaxies The X-ray Universe 2011

  5. X-ray properties Stacking Stacked X-ray spectrum • For the 34 QSO-2 with spectroscopic redshifts, only the rest-frame 2-10 keV band was used for each spectrum. • Spectral binning was designed to match a fixed rest-frame 200eV intervals. • The total accumulated counts are 4763 NH=(5.68.33.3)1022 cm-2 EW(FeK)~104 eV See Poster G41 (Salvato+11) Vincenzo Mainieri (ESO) QSO-2 and their host galaxies The X-ray Universe 2011

  6. QSO-2 sample Redshifts Optical spectroscopy Dn(4000) = 1.19±0.02 (Balogh+99) HδA = 4.7±0.4 (Worthey&Ottaviani97) Vincenzo Mainieri (ESO) QSO-2 and their host galaxies The X-ray Universe 2011

  7. SED SED fitting : galaxy + AGN AGN template: • Richards et al. (2006): mean QSO SED from 259 IR-selected QSOs from the SDSS with Spitzer photometry • 1<E(B-V)<9: <NH>~5x1022cm-2 (assuming 1/3 of Galactic dust-to-gas) -> E(B-V)~3 Galaxy templates: - 14 phenomenological: Polletta (2007) - Libr. of synthetic sp. (B&C) a) 10 declining SFH SFR µe-t/t t=[0.1-30] Gyr tage=[50Myr-5 Gyr] tage<tuniv(z) 0 < E(B-V) <0.5 b) 1 constant SF 14 Bands Used 6 SUBARU bands (U-z) I + K band (CFHT) 4 Spitzer/IRAC 24μm Spitzer/MIPS Vincenzo Mainieri (ESO) QSO-2 and their host galaxies The X-ray Universe 2011

  8. SED SED fitting : MIR/X-ray correlation • Gandhi+09 • VISIR/VLT high resolution imaging of a sample of local Seyferts: the least contaminated core fluxes • ~70 pc at z=0.01 • <40% contaminating star-formation in the unresolved flux A strong MIR (12.3 m) / X-ray (2-10 keV) correlation : log L12.3m=(-4.37±3.08)+(1.106±0.071) log L2-10 keV Vincenzo Mainieri (ESO) QSO-2 and their host galaxies The X-ray Universe 2011

  9. SED SED fitting : galaxy + AGN • Chabrier IMF • 2 minimization comparing observed and template fluxes at the redshift of the QSO-2 • PRIORS • The maximum allowed age is the age of the Universe at the redshift of the source • The AGN SED should fit the 12.3 m flux predicted using the Gandhi+09 correlation Vincenzo Mainieri (ESO) QSO-2 and their host galaxies The X-ray Universe 2011

  10. Host galaxy properties Stellar Mass Stellar Mass • 80% of the hosts have M*>1010 Msun • the fraction increases with M* • Chabrier IMF • Ilbert+10: parent sample of ~70,000 galaxies selected in theredshift range 0.8-1.5, where there is a good completeness for M*> 5x109 Msun • We folded the parent sample with the X-ray sensitivity map Vincenzo Mainieri (ESO) QSO-2 and their host galaxies The X-ray Universe 2011

  11. Host galaxy properties Rest frame colors Host galaxies classification Photometric classification Separating red and blue galaxies (Wilmer+06): “Blue” QSO-2 : 42% “Red” QSO-2 : 58% Star formation activity classification Active: log(sSFR/Gyr-1) > -1 (62%) Quiescent: log(sSFR/Gyr-1) < -1 (38%) ~20% “red” hosts are dusty star-forming galaxies (see also Cardamone+10, Lusso+11) Vincenzo Mainieri (ESO) QSO-2 and their host galaxies The X-ray Universe 2011

  12. Host galaxy properties Star formation SFR-M* correlation • @ z~1 : 62% of the hosts are star-forming and their rates are comparable to the main-sequence “Noeske” relation • Similar evolution of the <SSFR> Goal: compare the star formation in the QSO2 hosts with the tight correlation between SFR and M* of blue star-forming galaxies (e.g. Noeske+07; Daddi+07; Elbaz+07; Pannella+09; Rodighiero+10). Vincenzo Mainieri (ESO) QSO-2 and their host galaxies The X-ray Universe 2011

  13. Host galaxy properties Star formation SFR-M* correlation • @ z~1 : 62% of the hosts are star-forming and their rates are comparable to the main-sequence “Noeske” relation • Similar evolution of the <SSFR> Lutz,VM+10 Daddi+10 Mullaney+11 Daddi+10 Vincenzo Mainieri (ESO) QSO-2 and their host galaxies The X-ray Universe 2011

  14. Host galaxy properties Morphology Merging? • Greene et al. 2009 (SDSS QSO-2): nearly one-quarter have highly disturbed morphologies • Liu et al. 2009 (SDSS QSO-2): high fraction of double cores and physically associated companions from long-slit spectroscopy. Cisternas+11: a) no difference in the distortion fractions between inactive and active galaxies; b) ~65% of the AGN hosts are disk dominated. Vincenzo Mainieri (ESO) QSO-2 and their host galaxies The X-ray Universe 2011

  15. Host galaxy properties Morphology Morphology 35 QSO-2 with z<1.2 & IAB<24 ZEST+ (Scarlata+07; Carollo+11): Five non-parametric diagnostics (asymmetry A, concentration C, Gini coefficient G, 2nd order moment of the brightest 20% of galaxy pixels M20, ellipticity e) + Sersic index n Bulge-dominated Disks Mergers 23% F160W (H) 57% 20% F775W (i) Credits to the CANDELS team Lack of evidence is not necessarily evidence of lack: e.g. quasar phase at the end of the merging process (Di Matteo +05; Conselice03)? Vincenzo Mainieri (ESO) QSO-2 and their host galaxies The X-ray Universe 2011

  16. QSO-2 sample Morphology and accretion rate • bulge dominated galaxies tend to host low Edd ratios BHs • disks and mergers host high Edd ratios BHs <MBH>~4x108 Msun • lowest mass BHs are the fastest accretors (e.g McLure & Dunlop 2002; Netzer & Trakhtenbrot 2007) <MBH>~1x108 Msun Vincenzo Mainieri (ESO) QSO-2 and their host galaxies The X-ray Universe 2011

  17. Conclusions • Type-2 QSOs reside almost exclusively in massive galaxies, 80% have M*>1010 MSUN and the fraction of galaxies hosting them monotonically increases with M* • The majority of the hosts (>60%) are actively forming stars • The SSFR of QSO-2 hosts is similar to what observed for star-forming (“Noeske”) galaxies at z~1. • The evolution of SSFR of QSO-2 hosts is similar to the one of SFGs. • Morphological analysis suggests that the majority of the hosts are bulge dominated. • We do not find clear signature of merger activity for the majority of the hosts but it could be a time issue: QSO phase at the end of a major merger event. • Difficult to test the quasar fueling models by studying the morphology. Vincenzo Mainieri (ESO) QSO-2 and their host galaxies The X-ray Universe 2011

More Related