Modeling augmentations
E N D
Presentation Transcript
Modeling augmentations Maja Žumer University of Ljubljana FRBR Workshop May 2, 2005
Examples of augmentations • Text with illustrations (or illustrations with text) • Text with foreword, notes • Music and words • Music and choreography Not the best term, because it implies that one content part is more important... FRBR Workshop May 2, 2005
Delsey (1998) • Document part: Examples: physically separate component of a multipart document, accompanying material, issue of a serial • Content part: “Individual component of the intellectual or artistic content of document or document part (article in a serial, chapter/section/part, illustration for a text, sound aspect of a film...)” FRBR Workshop May 2, 2005
Our augmentation • Content part • segmental (foreword and text) • systemic (words and music) • Dependent (choreography) • Independent (foreword) FRBR Workshop May 2, 2005
FRBR and parts Whole/part relationship • Work • Expression Complement, supplement (work-to-work, expression-to-expression of different works, expression-to-work) FRBR Workshop May 2, 2005
Categories of parts in FRBR • Dependent: Component parts of a work that are intended to be used in context of the larger work and depend on the context of the larger work for their meaning • segmental (prefaces, chapters, sections, parts) • systemic (illustrations) • Independent: They do not depend on the context provided by the the larger work for their meaning FRBR Workshop May 2, 2005
Examples in FRBR • Supplement (referential) • index, concordance, teacher’s guide • Complement (referential) • libretto, choreography • Whole/part • illustration for a text FRBR Workshop May 2, 2005
Page 70: “There will often be no reason for a dependent part of a work to be separately identified or described in a bibliographic record. In certain instances ... it may be considered useful to identify and describe the component in its own right.” • Added entry • Contents note FRBR Workshop May 2, 2005
Issues • Is there always the ‘main work’? • Should segmental and systemic parts be modeled differently? • Should dependent and independent parts be modeled differently? • Should the model take into account the context in which the “combination” occured? FRBR Workshop May 2, 2005
Most manifestations embody more than one expression (work) For example: • text • illustrations • editor’s contribution • layout design • cover design • ... FRBR Workshop May 2, 2005
Possibilities • Choose the ‘main work’ and treat as a new expression of this work • Treat as embodiment of several expressions FRBR Workshop May 2, 2005
work T I expression M T I manifestation M FRBR Workshop May 2, 2005
work T+I+M expression T manifestation FRBR Workshop May 2, 2005
work expression T I M manifestation FRBR Workshop May 2, 2005
work expression T I M manifestation FRBR Workshop May 2, 2005
Proposal • Embodiment of several expressions • Treat as composite work if necessary • Record all expressions (works) important for the intended user FRBR Workshop May 2, 2005