1 / 23

CSC Electronics Evaluation

CSC Electronics Evaluation. Alexander Khodinov and Valeri Tcherniatine. Outline. Preamplifier Uniformity Study Cross Talks : Contributions from Analog and Electronic Components Does knowledge of XTalks improve electronic uniformity?. The characteristics of CSC preamplifier chips.

hisa
Télécharger la présentation

CSC Electronics Evaluation

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. CSC Electronics Evaluation Alexander Khodinov and Valeri Tcherniatine

  2. Outline • Preamplifier Uniformity Study • Cross Talks : Contributions from Analog and Electronic Components • Does knowledge of XTalks improve electronic uniformity?

  3. The characteristics of CSC preamplifier chips In order to check uniformity of CSC amplifiers the special test stand was built by Anand. The step function shaped pulse was injected to each of 25 channels of a chip through the system of capacitors. Totally 3720 CSC preamplifier chips were tested. The following chip characteristics were studied: • baseline ( in Volts, V); • noise (in electrons); • amplitude or the gain, which is pedestal extracted peak value (V); • width, which is FWHM of a positive part of a signal (nsec); • current (mA).

  4. The overall (over all chip and channel) distributions ofsignal baseline (a), amplitude (b), noise (c) and width (d)without any pre-selection. The most critical parameter is amplitude or gain. RMS of the amplitude distribution is about 3.1% It makes sense to assume, that non-uniformity is partially due to a relatively large spread in test stand capacitances.

  5. How the amplifier characteristics depend on the channel number in the chip • The abscissa axis indicates channel number in the chip and the ordinate axis is the overall averaged values of width (a), amplitude (b), noise (c) and baseline (d) along with their error bars • In the cases of noise and amplitude, errors are too small and lie inside dots • Baseline and the width plots shows clear correlation between their values and the channel number, while the effects of a layout in the chip do not have a characteristic tend in cases of amplitude and noise + + + + * - influence of a layout in the chip (not studied in frames of this work)

  6. Signal baseline (a), amplitude (b), noise (c) and width (d) distributions for the channel number 5 over all preamplifier chips • To exclude the effect of a spread in calibration capacitances, the same four distributions for a fixed channel number (number 5) are plotted. • Gaussian parameter sigma of the amplitude distribution dropped by the factor of 2 to 1.5%.

  7. The scatter plot of the amplitude of the channel 0 versus the channel 5 • Since measurements of all preamplifiers took around a month, various long term factors could contribute to the channel-by-channel fluctuations. • The scatter plot of the amplitude of the channel 0 versus the channel 5 has a shape of the ellipse (a), what makes the correlation between these two channels completely clear. • Following to the correlation analysis the projection of the Figure (a) to the axis along the small ellipse radius (Figure b) represents the actual amplitude distribution, and its Gaussian parameter sigma s= 0.97% may be taken as a conservative estimate for the preamplifier channel-to-channel gain uniformity.

  8. Amplitude versus Width anti-correlations

  9. Cross-Talks in ASMI-ASMII pack A unit of CSC Electronics is the pack: 1 ASMII + 2 ASMII ASMII (digital electronics) has 2Glinks, 96 channels each Custom made test-bench for electronics test ASMII Special tool is designed to inject the charge into a particular channel ASMI Charge injected into all channels simultaneously Analog part: preamplifier

  10. Calibration Example Large chamber #10. Precision strips X. No crosstalk. ROD data. Groups of 24 channels are emphasized. ADC/fC ADC

  11. COMMON / IDIVIDUAL Calibration Schema Common calibration, all channels are pulsed simultaneously, Cj-calibration capacitance; Individual calibration, when only particular channel under is pulsed through the special probe; Xtalk, the ratio of common to individual; All 96 x 2 test bed capacitances were measured prior to Xtalk study

  12. Cross Talk is Common to Individual Ratio production Revision E Glink B • How stable calibrations • and cross talks are? • So next steps are • Check for Xtalks in early electronic revisions • of ASMI and ASMII • 2. Comparison of two common and • individual calibrations taken in a few days • 3. Comparison between two Xtalks taken with • * different ASMIs, but same ASMIIs • * same ASMII and different ASMIs • * different ASMIs and different ASMIIs The periods of 24 channels are clearly seen Rev. E Rev. E

  13. Rev.A Left –Rev.B Right (test beam ASMI and ASMII) Glink C Rev. A Rev. B Note: Xtalks of Glinks C and B are significantly different for different revisions under study Glink B Rev. A Rev. B

  14. Comparison of two individual calibration rates (Ai/<A> -1) taken in a few days individual 1 Production Revision ASMII – 115 ASMI – 89L 88R individual 2

  15. … and two common … common 1 Production Revision ASMII – 115 ASMI – 89L 88R common 2

  16. Cross Talk Evaluation due to Analog and Digital Electronic Component com02/ind02-com04/ind04 ASMII – 115 ASMII – 009 ASMI – 88R 89L ASMI – 294R 295L com03/ind03-com04/ind04 ASMII – 115 ASMII – 009 ASMI – 294R 295L ASMI – 294R 295L com02/ind02-com03/ind03 ASMII – 115 ASMII – 115 ASMI – 88R 89L ASMI – 294R 295L

  17. Large chamber #10ROD data How XTalk Corrections improve uniformity of electronics No Crosstalk corrections Crosstalk corrections applied

  18. Example Large chamber #10. Precision strip side (X).Pedestal and Noise distributions. ROD data.

  19. Summary • Channel-by-Channel gain uniformity of preamplifier chips themselves is less than 1%; • CSC electronic (ASMI+ASMII) readout channel uniformity is a bit worse ~1.9%; • The individual-to-common calibration ratios, which we call XTalks, have 24-channel periodic structure; • Common calibration amplitude is distorted by XTalks up to ±4 %. • XTalks are stable in time (3-7 days) and are the same within 0.1-0.3% for all ASMIs and ASMIIs inside the production revisions; • Applying XTalks to calibration routine significantly improves the electronic uniformity

  20. Additional Slides

  21. Channel-by-Channel Difference in test-bench capacitors Glink B Glink C

  22. TB calibration study ci/<c24>-1 Dead channels and chamber parasitic capacitances are smashed the profiles, making ASMI type recovery more difficult Rev. C Rev. B Rev. B Rev.A? Dead channels

  23. Production summary resultson RATPAC stand-alone test bench not ROD

More Related