1 / 13

Limited Proteolysis: Optimum Conditions for Trypsinization of Alkaline Phosphatase

Limited Proteolysis: Optimum Conditions for Trypsinization of Alkaline Phosphatase. Anthony Kenrick Diana De La Torre Andrew Weigel Erin McCarthy. Goals. To find the ideal conditions to perform limited proteolysis Most efficient trypsin:AP ratio

hisano
Télécharger la présentation

Limited Proteolysis: Optimum Conditions for Trypsinization of Alkaline Phosphatase

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Limited Proteolysis:Optimum Conditions for Trypsinization of Alkaline Phosphatase Anthony Kenrick Diana De La Torre Andrew Weigel Erin McCarthy

  2. Goals • To find the ideal conditions to perform limited proteolysis • Most efficient trypsin:AP ratio • Buffer solution that optimizes trypsin activity • To determine how the reducing agent DTT affects the structural stability of AP

  3. Materials and Methods:An Overview First, observe proteolysis of Alkaline Phosphatase by PromegaTrypsin Gold Second, trypsinize alkaline phosphatase with and without the reducing agent DTT Third, optimize AP gel electrophoresis conditions Fourth, determine the most efficient ratio of Sigma Trypsin to Alkaline Phosphatase for digestion

  4. Proteolysis with Trypsin Gold • Take AP, initially at concentration of 1.47 mg/mL, and dilute to 0.5 mg/mL in a 200 mMTris-HCl buffer, pH 7.4 • Bring up lyophilized Trypsin Gold in 200 µL 50 mM acetic acid to a concentration of 0.5 µg/µL 1 • Incubate equal parts Trypsin Gold and AP at 37 °C for digestion • This ensured a 1:1 weight ratio of Trypsin:AP • Extract 15 µL samples at 45 minutes and 90 minutes to monitor digestion • Quench digestion for each sample by boiling in water for 2 minutes and subsequently adding 8 µL of loading buffer, boiling again for 5 minutes 2 • Run each sample, as well as undigested AP, in a precast 12% acrylamide gel at 200V for ~30 minutes • Stain with Coommassie Blue overnight and destain with 10/10 methanol/acetic acid solution

  5. Digestion with DTT • Using the same procedure as previously, generate trypsin and AP solutions • Prepare DTT solution for reduction of AP • Mix 0.161g DTT into 500μL of H2O to make 50 mM DTT stock solution • Add 2 μL DTT stock to 50 μL 0.5 mg/mL AP, making 2 mM DTT in the reaction vessel 3 • Incubate the sample in the dark at 50°C for an hour to reduce AP • Add 25 μL of 0.5 μg/μLtrypsin to the reduced sample and an equal volume of the same concentration unreduced AP and incubate at 37 °C 2 • Also incubate a sample of trypsin for 120 minutes • Remove 10 μL samples from each reaction vessel at 5, 15, 30, 45, 60, 90, and 120 minutes • Use the same technique as before to quench the digestion • Pour two 15% acrylamide gel, one for each reaction condition • Load each sample, as well as a molecular ladder, undigested AP, and trypsin, running the gels at 160 V for ~45 minutes • Stain and destain as previously described

  6. Optimize Electrophoresis Conditions • Generate new stock solution of alkaline phosphatase from lyophilized Sigma AP • Bring up in 1mL 5 mMTris-HCl to a final protein concentration of 4.5 mg/mL • Dilute 6 µL of the stock into 100 µL of 5 mMTris-HCl, creating a 0.135 µg/µL AP solution • Prepare three samples of varying protein concentrations with Loading Buffer to run through SDS-PAGE • 24 µL AP solution with 8 µL Loading Buffer for 3.24 µg AP/Well • 18 µL AP solution with 6 µL Loading Buffer for 2.43 µg AP/Well • 12 µL AP solution with 4 µL Loading Buffer for 1.62 µg AP/Well • Loading Buffer contains 1 part 4X stacking gel buffer, 1.8 part 10% SDS, 0.2 part β-mercaptoethanol, 2 part glycerol, and a dash bromophenol blue • Run a precast, 12% resolving gel at 160 volts until AP bands become discernible (20 minutes) • Stain and destain as before

  7. Ratio Trials of Sigma Trypsin • Add 12 µL of 2.5 mg/mL AP to 200 µL 5 mMTris-HCl, pH 8.0 to create 0.135 µg/µL AP solution 4 • Reconstitute lyophilized Sigma Trypsin in 20 µL of 1 M HCl to generate 1 µg/µL Trypsin5 • Dilute Trypsin for 1:2, 1:10, and 1:50 Trypsin:AP ratios by weight for digestion • Incubate each sample at 37 °C, removing 10 µL aliquots from each at 5, 30, 60, 105, 150 minutes past initial incubation • Trypsin at each ratio should be incubated to monitor any self digestion, only being removed at 150 minutes for analysis • Quench digestion for each sample by boiling in water for 2 minutes and subsequently adding 3.3 µL of loading buffer, boiling again for 5 minutes 2 • Run one precast 12% (160 V for roughly 40 minutes) for each ratio, with wells for a ladder, each time interval, undigested AP, and Trypsin • Stain and destain

  8. Day 1 Gel Undigested AP T = 90 min T = 45 min 1:1

  9. Day 3 Gel 30 15 90 AP 5 60 10 120 45 T M 5 AP T 60 30 15 90 45 120 M DTT No DTT

  10. Day 4 Gel T 150 M 5 60 AP T 105 30 150 M 5 60 AP 105 30 T 1:2 150 M 5 60 AP 105 30 1:50 1:10

  11. Conclusions From the results acquired, a 1:50 trypsin:AP ratio, by weight, yielded the most efficient proteolysis in a 2.5 hour time window Literature research and practical application show a 5mM Tris-HCl at pH 8.0 buffer works for digestion Use low concentrations of AP and Trypsin so that the trypsin can be heavily diluted into Tris-HCl, maintaining a higher pH than the HCl it is brought up in

  12. Ideas for Future Research • Allow limited proteolysis to take place for a longer period of time, such as 12-24 hours • Extract bands with good resolution and analyze samples via mass spectrometry • Find which domains are intact after limited proteolysis and • Repeat trials with DTT and use other reducing agents known to affect AP • Use mass spectrometry to compare the intact domains both with and without reducing agents

  13. References Promega Corporation (2009) Technical Bulletin Trypsin Gold, Mass Spectrometry Grade, pp 1-3. Cleveland, D.W., Fischer, S.G., Kirschner, M.W., Laemmli, U.K. (1977) Peptide Mapping by Limited Proteolysis in Sodium Dodecyl Sulfate and Analysis by Gel Electrophoresis. The Journal of Biological Chemistry 242, No. 3, pp 1102-1006. Sigma Aldrich Corporation (2011) Product Information DL-Dithiothreitol, pp 1. Akitama, Y., Ogura, T., Ito K. (1994) Involvement of FtsH in Protein Assembly into and through the Membrane. I Mutations That Reduce Retention Efficiency of a Cytoplasmic Reporter. The Journal of Biological Chemsitry 269, No. 7, pp 5518-5224. Sigma Aldrich Corporation (2011) Enzyme Explorer Trypsin, pp 1-3.

More Related