1 / 127

Middleware, Service-Oriented Architectures and Grid Computing

Learn about distributed computing, system interoperation, interoperability issues, and the fundamentals of service-oriented architecture. Explore the need for distributed computing in today's diverse environments.

hjustice
Télécharger la présentation

Middleware, Service-Oriented Architectures and Grid Computing

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Middleware, Service-Oriented Architectures and Grid Computing Prof. Steven A. Demurjian Computer Science & Engineering Department The University of Connecticut 371 Fairfield Road, Box U-2155 Storrs, CT 06269-2155 steve@engr.uconn.edu http://www.engr.uconn.edu/~steve (860) 486 - 4818 † Special Thanks to Prof. Alex Shvartsman, Keith Bessette, Scott Craig and Prior CSE333 students for providing portions of this material.

  2. What is a Distributed Application? • Distributed Computing/Applications are … • Systems of Systems • Interoperation of New & Existing Applications • Legacy, Databases, COTS, New Clients, etc. • Network Centric Environment • Distributed Computing Applications must … • Manage, Control, Access, and Modify Data • Allow Humans to Interact with Data • Provide High-Availability and Performance • Evolvable Over Time • Present & Future Health IT Systems and Health Information Exchange Exhibit All of These Characteristics and More!

  3. What is a Distributed Application? Java Client Database Database Legacy COTS COTS Java Client Server Server Legacy Client DB Client COTS Client Legacy System of Systems Network Centric Environment Heterogeneity Hardware OS, PLs High-Availability Performance Dynamic Environment Increase Productivity New/Innovative Information Use Transparent Interoperation

  4. Premise: Artifacts - set of DB, Legacy, COTS, GOTS, Each w/ API Premise: Users New and Existing Utilize Artifact APIs Distributed Application, DA Artifacts + Users What are the Issues? How Do they Interact? Heterogeneity Security Concerns Different Programmatic Models Etc. Etc. Etc. Another View – Today’s Reality Java Client Database COTS Legacy Legacy Client GOTS NETWORK GOTS Client Legacy Database Database Client COTS Client

  5. Why is Distributed Computing Needed? • Today’s Environments Contain Applications … • Created with Multiple Prog. Languages • Executing on Heterogeneous Platforms • Locally and Geographically Distributed • Distributed Computing Applications Must … • Allow Seamless and Transparent Interoperation • Provide Tools for Engineers and Users • Result: Inter-Operating Environment • Utilize Information in New/Innovative Ways • Leveraged to Increase Productivity • Support Diverse User Activities • Dynamically Respond to Changes

  6. Striving for New Techniques/Technologies • We Must Diverge from Business as Usual • C Programming with RPC • Customized Development without Reuse • Solutions that Aren’t Extensible and Evolvable • Cobbling Together Solutions w/o Method or Reason is Unacceptable and Doomed to Fail! • We Must Face Today’s Realities • Legacy Code is Fact of Life • New Technologies Offer New Challenges • Adopt to Leverage Their Benefits • We Must Draw Careful Balance to Opt for Mature Technologies While Targeting Emerging Technologies with Potential!

  7. Who are the Players? • Stakeholders • Software Architects (Requirements) • System Designers (Solutions) • Application Builders (Implementation) • Stakeholders Striving to Provide … • System Interaction and Information Exchange • Utilization of Existing Applications in New and Innovative Ways • End-Users at Various Skill Levels and with Specific and Limited Access Requirements • Novice vs. Adept vs. Expert • Who Uses What When and for How Long?

  8. Why a Distributed Application? • Reasons: • Data used is Distributed • Computation is Distributed • Application Users are Distributed • 2 Key Issues for Solution: • Platform-Independent Models and Abstraction Techniques • Hide Low-Level Details • Provide a Well-Performing Solution • Works Today and Tomorrow! Shared Objects • Easy to Re-use • Easy to distribute • Easy to maintain

  9. Distributed Systems Fundamental Realities of Distributed Systems

  10. Service Oriented Architecture & Grid Computing Marc Brooks, The MITRE Corporation The author's affiliation with The MITRE Corporation is provided for identification purposes only, and is not intended to convey or imply MITRE's concurrence with, or support for, the positions, opinions or viewpoints expressed by the author. http://colab.cim3.net/file/work/EmergingTechnology_Conference/2004-06-03_MITRE/Brooks_2004_03_24.ppt

  11. Service Registry Find Register Service Consumer Service Provider Bind, Execute What is Service Oriented Architecture (SOA)? • An SOA application is a composition of services • A “service” is the atomic unit of an SOA • Services encapsulate a business process • Service Providers Register themselves • Service use involves: Find, Bind, Execute

  12. Service Registry Find Register Service Consumer Service Provider Bind, Execute SOA Actors • Service Provider • Provides a stateless, location transparent business service • Service Registry • Allows service consumers to locate service providers that meet required criteria • Service Consumer • Uses service providers to complete business processes

  13. Service Registry Find Register Service Consumer Service Provider Bind, Execute SOA Benefits Business Benefits • Focus on Business Domain solutions • Leverage Existing Infrastructure • Agility Technical Benefits • Loose Coupling • Autonomous Service • Location Transparency • Late Binding

  14. What is a Service Oriented Architecture? • Solutions that Focus on Services that Need to be Available to Meet Need of Users (Entities) • Users are Assumed to be Interacting via Client Applications (Browser or Standalone) • Interactions with Services Transparent to Users (Integrated into Software) • Interactions Between Entities Occur via a Message Exchange - Conceptual • Resources are Software Artifact Accessible via API Consisting of Services • Services are Logical Grouping of Methods (Functions) that are Available for Use • Services are Utilized When Messages are Invoked Against Them by Outside Users • Both Web-Based and Middleware Settings

  15. Middleware-Based SOA • Distributed Object Computing Platforms are Well Established in the Field - Historically • DCE (Distributed Computing Environment) • COM/OLE (Component Object Model/Object Linking and Embedding) • Modern Middleware (JINI, CORBA, .NET): • CORBA –Standards Committee (OMG) Controls Technology – Many Programming Languages • JINI – Sun-Based Product – The Poor Mans CORBA – Java • .NET – Microsoft’s Forward into the Modern Market – C# (we will skip)

  16. What Must All SOA Provide? • Both Middleware & Web-Based SOAs Must Provide • Middle Layer Infrastructure that Provides Bridge Between Software Artifacts • Clients and Resources in Middlware Setting • Clients (Browsers) and Resources in Web Setting • Allow Software Artifacts (Resources) to Register/Publish their APIs (Services and Methods) for use by Clients/Other Resources • Lookup Service: Middleware for Artifacts (Resources and/or Clients and/or Other Resources) to Interact • Support Dynamic Discovery – Find Services Based on Attributes and Values • Location Transparency to Service Requestors • Found Service Sets up Binding Between Service Consumer and Service Provider

  17. SOA Akin to CBD

  18. Supplier /Consumer Model SUPPLY Build New Wrap Existing Buy CONSUME Assemble Applications MANAGE Publish Subscribe Catalog Browse

  19. Objectives of SOA • Can SOAs Support Highly-Available Distributed Applications? • Can Replicated Services be Registered and Available for Use by Clients? • Can SOAs Support a Network-Centric Environment with Dynamic Clients and Services? • Will Clients Continue to Operate Effectively if a Replicated Service Fails? • Can SOAs be Utilized to Maintain Data Consistency of Replicas? • Are SOAs Easy to Learn and Use? • What is Maturity Level of SOAs Technology? • How can SOA be Leverage for HIE/HIT?

  20. Overview of Presentation • Objective is to Explore CORBA, JINI, and .NET • Various Aspects of Three Technologies • Overall Architecture • Interoperability Capabilities • Access and Usage • Exploration of Web Service-Oriented Architectures • What are they? • How do they Work? • WSOAs + Middleware • Transition to Grid Computing • What is the Grid? • What is its Purpose and Role • Grid + SOA + Middleware • Where does Cloud Computing Fit?

  21. What is CORBA? • Common Object Request Broker Architecture • Architecture to Allow: • Existing COTS, GOTS, Legacy, DB, etc. to Interact with One Another • Integrate These with New Clients/Servers/Etc. • Consists of Following Major Components • Object Request Broker (ORB): • Arbitrate and Interact • Role of Lookup for Service Discovery • Interface Definition Language (IDL): • Common Definitional Format • Means for Different “Software” written in Different Languages to Interact with One Another

  22. What is CORBA? • CORBA is a Specification for Interoperability • OMG (Object Management Group) Supplies a Set of Flexible Abstraction and Concrete Services • Vendors Must Follow Standard CORBA Language Mappings Ada C and C++ COBOL Java to IDL Lisp CORBA Scripting Language Smalltalk Others Perl Haskell Python Eiffel PHP/ORBit

  23. What is CORBA? • Differs from Typical Programming Languages • Objects can be … • Located Throughout Network • Interoperate with Objects on other Platforms • Written in Ant PLs for which there is mapping from IDL to that Language

  24. What is CORBA? • CORBA Provides a Robust set of Services (COS) • Services to Support Integration and Interoperation of Distributed Objects • Services Defined on top of ORB as standard CORBA Objects with IDL interfaces • Vendors Must Implement CORBA Services (COS) Object Life Cycle Naming Events Relationships Externalization Transactions Trader Query Property

  25. What is CORBA? • Allow Interactions from Client to Server CORBA • Installed on All Participating Machines

  26. CORBA: Architectural Goals • Simplicity • Consistency • Scalability • Usability for End Users • Usability for Administrators • Usability for Implementers • Flexibility of Security Policy • Independence of Security Technology • Application Portability • Interoperability • Performance • Object Orientation

  27. Role of an Object Request Broker (ORB) • ORB Provides the Underlying Infrastructure for Supporting Interoperating Software Systems (Applications) Composed of Distributed Objects • ORB Provides the Basic Request Delivery • ORB Provides Interface Definitions • Location is Transparent to the Caller and Object Implementation • Caller and the Object Implementation Can be in the Same Process thru Opposite Sides of the World • ORB Manages Local Location and Optimization

  28. Interface Definition Language, IDL • Key Component of CORBA Is the Interface Definition Language, IDL • Mapping is Available in C, C++, Java, Ada, Etc. • IDL Is Independent of Any Language/Compiler • Multiple Inheritance • Public Interface Oriented • Not for Implementation • Primary Support for Interoperability Between Static and Dynamic Request Mechanisms • Advantage: Modification of Client Code without Impacting of Server Code, and vice-versa • Disadvantage: • A complete new language with C++ like Syntax • Programmers Must Prepare IDL Modules

  29. ORB and High Level View of Requests • The Request Consists of • Target Object • Operation (Method) • Parameters • Request Context (Optional)

  30. CORBA Components and Interfaces Client Object Implementation Object Adapter Dynamic Invoke Client Stubs ORB Interface Implementation Skeletons ORB Core One interface ORB internal interface One interface per object adaptor One interface per object operation • Client Stub: Client Invokes a Particular Object Op. • Dynamic Invocation: Run-Time-Construction of Operation Invocations • Implementation Skeleton: Interface Through Which a Method Receives a Request • Object Adapter: Provides (De)activation, Object Creation/Reference Mgmt. for Implementations • ORB Interface: Common ORB Operations

  31. Interfaces IDL Interface Definitions Implementation Installation Interface Repository Implementation Repository Client Stubs Implementation Skeletons Access Includes Includes Describes Client Object Implementation • Objects are Defined in IDL via Interfaces • Object Definitions (Interfaces) are Manifested as Objects in the Interface Repository, as Client Stubs, and as Implementation Skeletons • Descriptions of Object Implementations are Maintained as Objects in the Impl. Repository

  32. CORBA: Repositories • Interface Repository • Client access to definitions • Type checking for signatures • Traversal of inheritance graphs • Implementation Repository • Location of implementation • Activation information • Administration control • Security • Resource allocation

  33. Client Side Client Object Repository Object Implementation Dynamic Invoke Client Stubs ORB Interface Implementation Object Adapter Skeletons ORB Core • Clients Perform Requests Using Object References • Clients Issue Requests through Object Interface Stubs (Static) or DII (Dynamic Invocation Inter.) • Clients May Access General ORB Services: • Interface Repository (IR) • Context Management • Request Management

  34. Object Implementation Side Object Implementation Implementation Repository Client Implem. ORB Interface Skeletons Dynamic Invoke Client Stubs Object Adapter ORB Core • Implementations Receive Requests Thru Skeletons • Object Adapter Adapts to Specifics of Object Implementation Schemes • Basic Object Adapter (BOA) Provides: • Management of References • Method Invocation • Authentication • Implementation Registration • Activation / Deactivation

  35. Repositories: Interface and Implementation • Interface Repository • Dynamic Client Access to Interface Definitions to Construct a Request • Dynamic Type Checking of Request Signatures • Traversal of Inheritance Graphs • Implementation Repository • Location of Implementations and Methods • Activation Information • Administration Control • Resource Allocation • Security

  36. Three Types of ORBs Client Object Request ORB Client Object Request ORB • Single Process Library Resident • Client and Implementation Resident ORB and implementations implemented as libraries (routines) resident in the client. ORB implemented as libraries (routines) resident in the clients and in the implementations.

  37. Three Types of ORBs Client Object Request ORB • Server or Operating System Based ORB is implemented as a server (separate process) which brokers requests between client and implementation processes. ORB is part of the operating system.

  38. Three Types of Implementations Object Implementation Single Process Single method invocation Implementation is a single process that is activated upon the request delivery Object Implementation Single Process Method C Method B Method A • Single Process “one shot” Object • Multi-Threaded “resident” Object Implementation is a permanent or resident multi-threaded process

  39. Three Types of Implementations Object Implementation Process 1 Method A Process 2 Method B Process 3 Method C • Multi-Process Object Implementation is a set of processes dedicated to a particular (group of) method(s) Processes can be distributed

  40. Interface Definition Language, IDL • Language used to describe the interfaces that client objects call and object implementations provide. • Obeys the same lexical rules as C++, but introduces some new keywords. • Supports standard C++ preprocessing features. • Interfaces can have operations and attributes. • Operation declaration consists of a return type, an identifier, a parameter list, and an optional raises expression (exceptions). • Attribute declaration is logically equivalent to declaring a pair of accessor operations. May be declared as readonly. • Interface specifications are placed in a source file having the extension “.idl”

  41. IDL: Modules and Interfaces • Module: Used to scope IDL identifiers. • Mapped to C++ namespace with the same name. Mapped to a C++ class if the namespace construct is not supported. • Mapped to Java package with the same name. • IDL declarations not enclosed in any module have global scope when mapped. • Interface: Description of set of operations that a client may request of an object. • Multiple inheritance supported • Interface body may contain the following kinds of declarations: constant, type, attribute, and operation.

  42. IDL: Basic Types

  43. IDL: Complex Types • Structures: • struct FixedLengthStruct { long field1; // 32-bit short field2; // 16-bit}; • struct VariableLengthStruct { long field1; // 32-bit string field2;}; • Discriminated Unions: Cross between the C union and switch statements. • Enumerations: Ordered list of identifiers. • enum quality_t { Poor, Fair, Good, Excellent};

  44. IDL: Complex Types (cont.) • Sequences: One-dimensional array with maximum size (fixed at compile time) and length (set at run time). • Unbounded Sequence:typdef sequence<long> longSeq; • Bounded Sequence:sequence<long,10> fieldname; • Strings: Declared using keyword string. May be bounded or unbounded. • string name<32>; //bounded • Arrays: Multidimensional, fixed-size arrays of any IDL data type.

  45. IDL Example: GUI /* * File Name: GUI.idl */ #ifndef GUI_IDL #define GUI_IDL module GUI { struct timespec_t { long tv_sec; long tv_nsec; }; struct Dialog1Data_t { timespec_t DataTime; float val; }; struct Dialog2Data_t { timespec_t DataTime; long val; }; interface MainWindow { void logEvent(in timespec_t timestamp, in string val); }; interface Dialog1 { void update(in Dialog1Data_t val); }; interface Dialog2 { void update(in Dialog2Data_t val); }; }; #endif // GUI_IDL

  46. IDL Example: Server /* * File Name: Server.idl */ #ifndef SERVER_IDL #define SERVER_IDL #include "GUI.idl" interface Server { enum reason_t { NotInitialized, ErrorDetected }; exception NotAvailable { reason_t reason; }; exception OperationTimeout {}; void registerMainWindow( in GUI::MainWindow val, in boolean flag) raises (OperationTimeout); void setMainWindowEnabled( in boolean flag) raises (OperationTimeout); void registerDialog1( in GUI::Dialog1 val, in boolean flag) raises (OperationTimeout); void setDialog1Enabled( in boolean flag) raises (OperationTimeout); GUI::Dialog1Data_t getDialog1Data() raises (OperationTimeout, NotAvailable); void registerDialog2( in GUI::Dialog2 val, in boolean flag) raises (OperationTimeout); void setDialog2Enabled( in boolean flag) raises (OperationTimeout); GUI::Dialog2Data_t getDialog2Data() raises (OperationTimeout, NotAvailable); }; #endif // SERVER_IDL

  47. A Comparison of Jini and CORBA Andrew See Liyuan Yu Zhongying Wang Michael Collins

  48. What is CORBA? • Common Object Request Broker Architecture (CORBA) specification defines a framework for object-oriented distributed applications.. • It is an open standard for heterogeneous computing. • Allows distributed programs in different languages and different platforms to interact as though they were in a single programming language on one computer

  49. Object Request Broker (ORB) • A software component that mediates transfer of messages from a program to an object located on a remote host. • 0. Invocation ( with an object reference) • 1. Locate CORBA objects and marshal parameters • 2. Network Delay • 3. Unmarshal parameters • 4. Method Execution • 5. Result marshal • 6. Network Delay • 7. Result unmarshal Client ORB ORB Server Network invocation 0 CORBA Object 1 2 3 4 execution 5 6 7

  50. CORBA Objects and IDL • Each CORBA object has a clearly defined interface specified in CORBA interface definition language (IDL). • Distributed objects are identified by object references, which are typed by the IDL interfaces. • The interface definition specifies the member functions available to the client without any assumption about the implementation of the object.

More Related