1 / 11

Pest Risk Analysis (PRA) Training

CFIA-ACIA. CFIA-ACIA. Pest Risk Analysis (PRA) Training. International Plant Protection Convention (IPPC). Risk Communication. Pest Risk Analysis (PRA) Training. Risk Communication. Two-way communication Get information Give information Continuous throughout PRA process

hogand
Télécharger la présentation

Pest Risk Analysis (PRA) Training

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. CFIA-ACIA CFIA-ACIA Pest Risk Analysis (PRA) Training International Plant Protection Convention (IPPC)

  2. Risk Communication Pest Risk Analysis (PRA) Training

  3. Risk Communication • Two-way communication • Get information • Give information • Continuous throughout PRA process • Different purposes & audiences at different points in process • Why? Who? What? When? How?

  4. Why? • IPPC principle of transparency • Ensures completeness & validity of information used in PRA • Facilitates mutual understanding & compliance • Government and stakeholders will often reach the same conclusions • Experts better able to contribute • Facilitates international harmonization • Ensures a better conclusion -- ultimately a better policy

  5. Why? • Different parties bring different information, opinions, expertise and viewpoints; • Producers & industry representatives know about the affected industry, environment or commodity • Researchers know about the pest(s), their biology, control, identification, or survey methods etc. • Economists understand the bigger economic implications • Many others … • Impossible for NPPO to fully understand all facets and impacts of policy

  6. National and sub-national governments Other NPPOs or RPPOs National, provincial and local industry associations Growers, sellers, processors Scientific community Environmental groups Aboriginal groups Private citizens, landowners Who? • Take your time to be sure you’ve identified everyone

  7. What? When? • Different audiences at different points in process • Initiation • Potentially affected stakeholders • Other NPPOs • Risk assessment • Pest experts • Scientists, academia • Economists • Modellers • Risk management • Pest control specialists • Survey or inspection experts • Potentially affected stakeholders • Other government agencies • Each case is a little different • Communicate as issues or questions arise

  8. How? • Interactive • Telephone • Face-to-Face Meetings • In writing • Presentations • Polls • Passive • Websites • Posters • Handouts • Passive & Active Tools for communicating each have their benefits • Using multiple tools assures the furthest reach

  9. Expert Opinion • Person with special knowledge in a particular subject area • Seek expert opinion to: • Contribute to a PRA or part thereof • Validate a PRA or part thereof • Experts should: • Come from a variety of places • Understand the purpose of their contribution • Understand PRA

  10. Risk Communication • Continuous • Two-way • Seek out experts • Explain PRA • Give parties opportunity to contribute • Let them know their contribution is valued • Integrated input into PRA, where possible

  11. Challenges • NPPO must try to balance multiple points of view and deal with uncertainty • Which values are “worth” more? • Economic • Environmental • How can we be certain of doing the right thing? • How can we be sure we talked to the right person or people? • How can we be sure they understand?

More Related