1 / 24

Will the Airline Industry Recover?

Will the Airline Industry Recover?. Group E: Daniel Grund Daniel Jiang You Ren David Rhodes Catherine Wohletz James Young. Econ 240C. Table of Contents. Motivation Data Collection Identifying the Model Intervention Variables Forecast Conclusions. Motivation.

Télécharger la présentation

Will the Airline Industry Recover?

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Will the Airline Industry Recover? Group E: Daniel Grund Daniel Jiang You Ren David Rhodes Catherine Wohletz James Young Econ 240C

  2. Table of Contents • Motivation • Data Collection • Identifying the Model • Intervention Variables • Forecast • Conclusions

  3. Motivation • Will the airline industry be able to recover after the September 11th terrorist attack? • What events significantly effect the airline industry post deregulation? • What are forecasted revenue passenger miles?

  4. Data Collection • Bureau of Transportation Statistics • Final Scheduled and Non-Scheduled Revenue Passenger Miles • Monthly Data, January 1981-December 2003. • http://www.bts.gov/oai/

  5. The Raw Data

  6. Difference of Logs

  7. Clearly there is a lot of structure to this data. Autocorrelation Partial Correlation AC PAC Q-Stat Prob **|. | **|. | 1 -0.293 -0.293 23.894 0.000 .|. | .|. | 2 0.036 -0.055 24.257 0.000 .|. | .|. | 3 -0.020 -0.027 24.367 0.000 *|. | *|. | 4 -0.108 -0.132 27.651 0.000 .|** | .|* | 5 0.229 0.176 42.458 0.000 *****|. | *****|. | 6 -0.687 -0.661 176.06 0.000 .|** | *|. | 7 0.254 -0.094 194.45 0.000 *|. | **|. | 8 -0.098 -0.222 197.16 0.000 .|. | **|. | 9 -0.025 -0.223 197.34 0.000 .|. | ***|. | 10 0.023 -0.405 197.49 0.000 **|. | ****|. | 11 -0.214 -0.492 210.72 0.000 .|****** | .|*** | 12 0.825 0.399 407.92 0.000 **|. | .|* | 13 -0.267 0.077 428.60 0.000 .|* | .|* | 14 0.082 0.092 430.54 0.000 .|. | *|. | 15 -0.040 -0.072 431.01 0.000 .|. | .|* | 16 -0.055 0.098 431.91 0.000 .|* | .|. | 17 0.169 -0.019 440.33 0.000 *****|. | .|. | 18 -0.635 0.048 559.66 0.000 .|** | .|. | 19 0.261 0.003 579.91 0.000 *|. | .|. | 20 -0.115 -0.004 583.87 0.000

  8. Basic Observations • Clearly the series is highly regular, following a more or less constant cycle in the difference of logs until September 2001. After that time there are distinctive disturbances to that pattern. • Obviously September 11th was a major factor, but we found two other significant disturbances.

  9. Pre-9/11 Regression Coefficient Std. Error z-Statistic Prob. JAN -0.028213 0.009585 -2.943498 0.0032 FEB -0.057530 0.008373 -6.871120 0.0000 MAR 0.210592 0.008715 24.16362 0.0000 APR -0.060710 0.012821 -4.735313 0.0000 MAY 0.017059 0.012830 1.329640 0.1836 JUN 0.085402 0.012386 6.895121 0.0000 JUL 0.059078 0.011623 5.082747 0.0000 AUG 0.034427 0.009840 3.498584 0.0005 SEP -0.208309 0.013356 -15.59622 0.0000 OCT 0.040941 0.015114 2.708797 0.0068 NOV -0.077783 0.011069 -7.026996 0.0000 DEC 0.037158 0.014168 2.622738 0.0087 AR(1) -0.477291 0.077416 -6.165296 0.0000 AR(2) 0.282609 0.086150 3.280437 0.0010 SAR(12) 0.720921 0.082302 8.759497 0.0000 MA(2) -0.717934 0.061278 -11.71602 0.0000 SMA(12) -0.488249 0.095803 -5.096384 0.0000 Variance Equation C 0.000231 8.18E-05 2.823865 0.0047 ARCH(1) 0.517236 0.161033 3.211984 0.0013 GARCH(1) 0.199424 0.155043 1.286253 0.1984

  10. Correllelogram of Residuals: further ARMA terms could be used, but unnecessary. Autocorrelation Partial Correlation AC PAC Q-Stat Prob .|* | .|* | 1 0.100 0.100 2.3829 .|* | .|* | 2 0.095 0.086 4.5398 .|. | .|. | 3 -0.002 -0.019 4.5404 .|. | .|. | 4 0.039 0.033 4.9030 .|. | .|. | 5 0.025 0.021 5.0553 *|. | *|. | 6 -0.070 -0.083 6.2435 0.012 .|* | .|* | 7 0.072 0.085 7.4850 0.024 .|. | .|. | 8 -0.014 -0.017 7.5347 0.057 *|. | *|. | 9 -0.064 -0.082 8.5388 0.074 .|. | .|. | 10 -0.048 -0.023 9.1086 0.105 .|* | .|* | 11 0.094 0.116 11.292 0.080 .|. | .|. | 12 0.060 0.035 12.171 0.095 .|. | .|. | 13 0.026 0.014 12.343 0.137 .|* | .|* | 14 0.098 0.092 14.753 0.098 .|. | .|. | 15 -0.005 -0.043 14.759 0.141 .|. | .|. | 16 0.014 -0.005 14.806 0.192 *|. | .|. | 17 -0.077 -0.054 16.294 0.178 .|. | *|. | 18 -0.048 -0.064 16.871 0.205 .|. | .|. | 19 -0.047 -0.040 17.428 0.234 .|. | .|. | 20 0.002 0.049 17.428 0.294 .|. | .|. | 21 0.052 0.061 18.126 0.317 .|. | .|. | 22 0.001 -0.006 18.126 0.381

  11. Correllelogram of Squared Residuals: Appears to be adequately clean, due to GARCH. Autocorrelation Partial Correlation AC PAC Q-Stat Prob .|. | .|. | 1 0.037 0.037 0.3203 .|. | .|. | 2 -0.054 -0.055 1.0010 .|. | .|. | 3 -0.003 0.002 1.0025 .|. | .|. | 4 -0.048 -0.051 1.5431 *|. | *|. | 5 -0.097 -0.094 3.7911 .|. | .|. | 6 0.008 0.009 3.8050 0.051 .|. | .|. | 7 -0.029 -0.041 4.0135 0.134 *|. | *|. | 8 -0.070 -0.071 5.2164 0.157 .|* | .|* | 9 0.104 0.098 7.8579 0.097 .|. | .|. | 10 0.008 -0.017 7.8745 0.163 .|. | .|. | 11 -0.049 -0.041 8.4718 0.206 .|. | .|. | 12 -0.005 -0.013 8.4770 0.292 .|. | .|. | 13 -0.028 -0.038 8.6767 0.370 .|. | .|. | 14 -0.032 -0.014 8.9370 0.443 .|. | .|. | 15 -0.021 -0.035 9.0528 0.527 .|* | .|* | 16 0.099 0.093 11.546 0.399 .|* | .|* | 17 0.144 0.150 16.789 0.158 .|. | *|. | 18 -0.054 -0.081 17.520 0.177 .|. | .|. | 19 -0.007 0.002 17.534 0.229 .|. | .|. | 20 -0.028 -0.024 17.735 0.277 .|. | .|. | 21 -0.052 -0.031 18.423 0.300 *|. | *|. | 22 -0.075 -0.058 19.883 0.280

  12. Residuals are fairly normal.

  13. Actual Growth versus Pre-9/11 forecasting.

  14. Difference in recolored forecast versus actual (in 1000s of RPMs) War begins 9/11 Troop deployment

  15. Disruptions to the forecast • By observing the data we found that there were three obvious events which significantly shocked the airline industry, each followed by a one or two month recovery with rates of growth far from predicted values. • These events were Sept 2001 (9/11), Dec 2002 (Deployment of troops) and March 2003 (Commencement of war with Iraq). • During the deployment of troops, US commercial airlines were used to move troops and equipment. The following two months were a return to equilibrium. • The commencement of war with Iraq brought additional concerns of terrorist attacks, but these concerns faded.

  16. December 2002 (PREEVENT2) was not statistically significant but had some explanatory power. All other events were significant. Coefficient Std. Error z-Statistic Prob. EVENT -0.354932 0.023675 -14.99178 0.0000 AFTEREVENT 0.095437 0.013862 6.884513 0.0000 PREEVENT2 0.094406 0.086043 1.097192 0.2726 EVENT2 -0.258901 0.096246 -2.689993 0.0071 AFTEREVENT2 0.142701 0.050712 2.813980 0.0049 EVENT3 -0.238504 0.024301 -9.814738 0.0000 AFTEREVENT3 0.246463 0.021573 11.42453 0.0000 JAN -0.033452 0.009200 -3.636265 0.0003 FEB -0.058835 0.007390 -7.961657 0.0000 … … … … … NOV -0.081920 0.008804 -9.304688 0.0000 DEC 0.051670 0.009952 5.192004 0.0000 AR(1) -0.394049 0.068435 -5.758039 0.0000 AR(2) 0.360461 0.091758 3.928399 0.0001 SAR(12) 0.597508 0.106091 5.632041 0.0000 MA(2) -0.745415 0.075285 -9.901220 0.0000 SMA(12) -0.370395 0.115133 -3.217091 0.0013 Variance Equation C 0.000327 0.000128 2.548138 0.0108 ARCH(1) 0.372624 0.133946 2.781891 0.0054 GARCH(1) 0.151924 0.209176 0.726295 0.4677

  17. Event variables capture the effects of major events in recent years.

  18. Residuals appear to be adequately clean. Autocorrelation Partial Correlation AC PAC Q-Stat Prob .|* | .|* | 1 0.073 0.073 1.3918 .|* | .|* | 2 0.081 0.076 3.1464 .|. | .|. | 3 -0.029 -0.041 3.3714 .|. | .|. | 4 0.029 0.028 3.5937 .|. | .|. | 5 0.028 0.030 3.8083 *|. | *|. | 6 -0.074 -0.085 5.2728 0.022 .|. | .|. | 7 0.032 0.041 5.5443 0.063 .|. | .|. | 8 -0.008 0.001 5.5599 0.135 *|. | *|. | 9 -0.078 -0.094 7.2197 0.125 *|. | *|. | 10 -0.078 -0.059 8.8698 0.114 .|* | .|* | 11 0.084 0.115 10.800 0.095 .|. | .|. | 12 0.020 0.001 10.911 0.143 .|. | .|. | 13 0.009 -0.006 10.933 0.206 .|* | .|* | 14 0.075 0.096 12.508 0.186 .|. | *|. | 15 -0.031 -0.061 12.769 0.237 .|. | .|. | 16 0.027 0.005 12.980 0.295 *|. | .|. | 17 -0.072 -0.037 14.423 0.275 .|. | .|. | 18 -0.003 -0.021 14.426 0.345 .|. | .|. | 19 0.000 -0.005 14.426 0.418 .|. | .|. | 20 0.025 0.054 14.600 0.481

  19. Residuals Squared also clean. Autocorrelation Partial Correlation AC PAC Q-Stat Prob .|. | .|. | 1 0.024 0.024 0.1464 .|. | .|. | 2 -0.032 -0.033 0.4198 .|. | .|. | 3 -0.012 -0.011 0.4591 .|. | .|. | 4 -0.044 -0.045 0.9766 *|. | *|. | 5 -0.088 -0.087 3.0624 .|. | .|. | 6 0.021 0.022 3.1807 0.075 .|. | .|. | 7 -0.033 -0.041 3.4680 0.177 .|. | .|. | 8 -0.039 -0.040 3.8736 0.275 .|* | .|* | 9 0.075 0.068 5.4076 0.248 .|. | .|. | 10 -0.022 -0.035 5.5373 0.354 .|. | .|. | 11 -0.045 -0.040 6.0822 0.414 .|. | .|. | 12 0.019 0.011 6.1769 0.519 .|. | .|. | 13 -0.006 -0.010 6.1860 0.626 .|. | .|. | 14 -0.016 -0.005 6.2533 0.714 .|. | .|. | 15 -0.009 -0.023 6.2740 0.792 .|* | .|* | 16 0.088 0.088 8.4534 0.672 .|* | .|* | 17 0.108 0.113 11.707 0.469 .|. | .|. | 18 -0.033 -0.048 12.022 0.526 .|. | .|. | 19 -0.011 0.000 12.057 0.602 .|. | .|. | 20 -0.023 -0.010 12.213 0.663

  20. Residuals are normal.

  21. The Pre-9/11 forecast and event model forecast give almost identical results for 2004 growth rates. This suggests that no further recovery from 9/11 is expected.

  22. Conclusion • Airline industry not expected to recover to pre-September 11th, 2001, growth path by the end of 2004. • Airline growth rates appear to have returned to their original pattern except for additional shocks due to Middle-East current events, but the industry appears to have permanently lost at least 5 million RPMs per month.

  23. QUESTIONS?

More Related